Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

E-resources and their Usage Patterns among the Lawyers of the Supreme Court of India: a Case Study


Affiliations
1 Library and Information Science Wing, Directorate of Distance Education, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar 608 002, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study is concentrated on the evaluation of the use of electronic resources and services in terms of use and user satisfaction in Supreme Court Library. Results of the present study show that senior advocates have specialized themselves in criminal law. The study reveals that 3-4 hours of access to internet is quite common among the respondents of government advocates and junior advocates. The analysis shows that senior advocate respondents rank first position with respect to their overall purpose of gathering e-resources, panel advocate respondents the second, government advocates, the third and junior advocates, the last. The study reveals that junior advocate respondents take the first position with respect to their overall problems in accessing e-resources , government advocate respondents, the second, panel advocates the third and senior advocates the last.

Keywords

E-resources, Internet, Supreme Court of India, Library Services, Cd-rom Databases, Legal Websites.
User
About The Author

S. Thanuskodi
Library and Information Science Wing, Directorate of Distance Education, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar 608 002
India


Notifications

  • Herring (Susan Davis). Use of Electronic Resources in Scholarly Electronic Journals: A Citation Analysis. College and Research Libraries. 2002 July. p334-340.

  • Heydet-kirsch (Patricia E). The Use of the Internet with in the College Search Places of High School Juniors and Seniors. Dissertation University of Miami, DAI-A 65-01 (2003): 96. 8 July 2004. http://wwwlub.uni.com/dissertatins/fulleit/3119901.

  • Kanwal (Ameen). Barriers in Collection Sharing among Libraries of Pakistan:University Library Managers’ Viewpoint. Library and Information Science Research Electronic Journal. Vol. 18(1); 2008 March. http://libres.curtin.edu.au/

  • Krueger (Janice); Ray Ron (L); Knight (Lorrie). Applying Web Usability Techniques to Assess Student Awareness of Library Web Resources. The Journal of Academic Librarian Ship. Vol. 30(4); 2004 July; p285-293.

  • Melchionda (M G). Librarians in the age of the internet: Their attitudes and roles. New Library World, Vol. 108(3/4); 2007; p123-140.

  • Miller (R H). Electronic Resources and Academic Libraries, 1980-2000: A Historical Perspective. Library Trends. Vol. 48(4); 2000; p645-670.

  • Razaand (M M); Upadhyaye (A K). Usage of E-journals by Researchers in Aligarh Muslim University: A Study. The International Information & Library Review. Vol. 38(3); September 2006; p170-179.

  • Schanffner (B L). Electronic resources: A Wolf in Sheep Clothing? College and Research libraries. Vol. 62(3); 2001; p239-249.

  • Shoham (Snunith.); Roitberg( Nurit). From Electronic Library to a Learning Centre in the Academic Library: Integrating Traditional and New Use in the Library Work Station. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 31(4); 2005 July.


Abstract Views: 329

PDF Views: 20




  • E-resources and their Usage Patterns among the Lawyers of the Supreme Court of India: a Case Study

Abstract Views: 329  |  PDF Views: 20

Authors

S. Thanuskodi
Library and Information Science Wing, Directorate of Distance Education, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar 608 002, India

Abstract


The present study is concentrated on the evaluation of the use of electronic resources and services in terms of use and user satisfaction in Supreme Court Library. Results of the present study show that senior advocates have specialized themselves in criminal law. The study reveals that 3-4 hours of access to internet is quite common among the respondents of government advocates and junior advocates. The analysis shows that senior advocate respondents rank first position with respect to their overall purpose of gathering e-resources, panel advocate respondents the second, government advocates, the third and junior advocates, the last. The study reveals that junior advocate respondents take the first position with respect to their overall problems in accessing e-resources , government advocate respondents, the second, panel advocates the third and senior advocates the last.

Keywords


E-resources, Internet, Supreme Court of India, Library Services, Cd-rom Databases, Legal Websites.

References