Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Internet Search Engines:A Comparative Study and Evaluation Methodology


Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shimoga, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Paper reports on the evaluation of six search engines viz., Yahoo, Google, Altavista, Lycos, Excite and Hotbot. The findings indicate that search results of each of the search engines vary significantly from one another. It is found that Altavista searched more number of sites (45,448) while Excite searched least number of sites (283). In case of relevancy of search engines majority of relevant sites were found in case of Google (28%) followed by Yahoo (26%) and Altavista (20%). Further analysis shows that more number of irrelevant sites found in case of Hotbot (61.6%), Lycos (59.6%) and Alatavista (54.8%).

Keywords

Internet, Search Engines:Yahoo, Google, Altavista, Lycos, Excite, Hotbot.
User
About The Authors

B. S. Biradar
Department of Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shimoga
India

B. T. Sampath Kumar
Department of Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shimoga
India


Notifications

  • Taubes (Gary). Indexing the Internet. Science. September 1995; p1354-356.

  • Wildstrom, (tephen H) Feeling your web around the Web. Business Week. September 1995; p22. (Notes. (Greg R). Searching the World Wide Web: Lycos, WebCrawler and More. Online. Vol. 19(4); July/August 1995a; p48-53.

  • Notess (Greg R). The Infoseek Databases. Database. August/September 1995b; p85-87.

  • Leighton (H V). Performance of four World Wide Web (WWW) index services: InfoSeek, Lycos, WebCrawler and WWWWorm. 1995. http://www.winona.msus.edu/ services-f/libraryf/ webind.htm.

  • Courtois (Martin P); Baer (William M) and Stark (Marcella). Cool tools for searching the Web: A performance evaluation. Online.Vol.19 (6); November/December 1995; p14-32.

  • Scoville (Richard). Special report: Find it on the net! PC World. January 1996, September 11, 1995; p22.

  • Kimmel (S). Robot generated databases on the World Wide Web. Database. Vol. 19 (1); 1996; p40-49.

  • Leonard (Andrew J). Where to find anything on the net. http://www.cnet.com/ Content/Reviews/Search/

  • Chu (H) and Rosenthal (M). Search engines for the World Wide Web: A comparative study and evaluation methodology. Paper covered in ASIS 1996 Annual Conference Proceedings, Baltimore, MD, October 19-24, 1996, p127-135. http://www.asis.org/annual-96/ ElectronicProceedings/chu.html

  • Ding (W) and Marchionini (G). A comparative study of Web search service performance. Paper covered in ASIS 1996 Annual conference proceedings. Baltimore, MD, October 19-24, 1996; p136-142.

  • Gauch (S) and Wang (G). Information fusion with perfusion. Webnet 96 Conference, San Francisco, CA, October 15-19, 1996. http://www.csbs.utsa.edu:80/info/webnet96/html/ 155.htm

  • Tomaiuolo; Packer (Tomaiuolo); Nicholas (G) and Joan (G Packer). An analysis of Internet search engines: assessment of over 200 search queries. Computers in Libraries. Vol. 16(6); June 1996; p58. The list of queries used is in Quantitative Analysis of Five WWW Search Engines. http://neal.ctstateu.edu:2001/htdocs/websearch.html

  • Meghaghab (D.B) and Meghaghab (G.V). Information retrieval in cyberspace. Paper covered in The digital revolution; Proceedings of the ASIS Mid-Year Meetings, San Diego, CA, May 18-22 1996. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc., 1998, p224-237.

  • Clarke (S J) and Willete (P). Estimating the recall performance of Web search engines. Aslib Proceedings. Vol.49 (7); 1997; p184-189.

  • Leighton (H V) and Srivastava (J). Precision among World Wide Web services (search engines): Altavaista, Excite, Hotbot, Infoseek, Lycos. 1997. http://www.winona.msus.edu/ library/webind2/webind2.htm

  • Meghaghab (D.B) and Meghaghab (G.V). Op.cit. p224-237.

  • Leonard (J Andrew). Op.cit

  • Chu (H) and Rosenthal (M). Op.cit

  • Clarke (S J) and Willete (P). Op.cit

  • Jenkins (C) and others. Searching the World Wide Web: An evaluation of available tools and methodologies. Information and Software Technology. Vol. 39; 1998.

  • Luther (Judy). Trumping Google?: Metasearching's promise. Library Journal. January 10; 2003.

  • Notess (Greag R). A decade on the net. Online. Vol. 27(2); 2003.

  • Dating the Web: The Confusion of Chronology. Online. Vol. 28(6); 2004.

  • Unusual power web searching commands. Online. Vol. 27(6); 2003.

  • Search Engine Prefixes and Shortcuts. Online. Vol. 28(3); 2004.

  • Oppenheim (C) and others. The evaluation of WWW search engines. Journal of Documentation. Vol. 56(2); March 2000.

  • Winship (I R). World Wide Web searching tools: An evaluation. VINE. Vol. 99; 1995.


Abstract Views: 417

PDF Views: 7




  • Internet Search Engines:A Comparative Study and Evaluation Methodology

Abstract Views: 417  |  PDF Views: 7

Authors

B. S. Biradar
Department of Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shimoga, India
B. T. Sampath Kumar
Department of Library and Information Science, Kuvempu University, Shimoga, India

Abstract


Paper reports on the evaluation of six search engines viz., Yahoo, Google, Altavista, Lycos, Excite and Hotbot. The findings indicate that search results of each of the search engines vary significantly from one another. It is found that Altavista searched more number of sites (45,448) while Excite searched least number of sites (283). In case of relevancy of search engines majority of relevant sites were found in case of Google (28%) followed by Yahoo (26%) and Altavista (20%). Further analysis shows that more number of irrelevant sites found in case of Hotbot (61.6%), Lycos (59.6%) and Alatavista (54.8%).

Keywords


Internet, Search Engines:Yahoo, Google, Altavista, Lycos, Excite, Hotbot.

References