Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Scholarly Electronic Communication amongst the Aerospace Engineering Community and the Impact of Electronic Journals: A Review Study


Affiliations
1 Knowledge and Technology Management Division, National Aerospace Laboratories (CSIR), India
2 DOS, LIS, University of Mysore, India
3 Computational and Theoretical Fluid Dynamics Division, National Aerospace Laboratories (CSIR), NWTC, Belur Campus, NAL, Bangalore, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This review paper highlights the very special „niche segment‟ to which the aerospace scientists and engineers belonging to different countries right across the globe occupy. Highlighting aviation as one of the most significant technological marvels of our times, the paper discusses in detail the various significant aspects related to what aerospace engineering is all about and how the electronic media has come in a big way to support scholarly communication within this „niche‟ aerospace engineering community. The paper also reviews the impact of Internet, the availability of high-speed networks which has enabled these scientists and engineers have access to electronic journals right at their desktops and also keep track of the global R&D happenings in their respective field of specialization. Various studies conducted (as indicated in this paper) illustrate how „electronic journals‟ are highly important to the aerospace scientists and engineers. Important studies in this connection have also proved that scientists are willing to pay a high price in their time to spend many hours reading electronic scientific literature. Many relevant studies also have revealed that the information that a scientist or engineer gets from refereed journals has greatly resulted in their improved performance. The review paper also touches upon key aspects like: (a) Distinguishing engineers from scientists, (b) Their differences in knowledge diffusion, (c) Their communication behaviours, (d) Their information seeking behaviour, (e) The aerospace engineering community in particular and the (g) the importance of scientific communication for advances in aerospace engineering and the need for electronic information resources.

Keywords

Information Processing in Science And Technology, Communication Behaviour of Scientists And Engineers, Engineers Information Seeking Behaviour, Scholarly Electronic Communication, the Aerospace Engineering Community, Impact of Electronic Journals.
User
About The Authors

R. Guruprasad
Knowledge and Technology Management Division, National Aerospace Laboratories (CSIR)
India

Khaiser Nikam
DOS, LIS, University of Mysore
India

Vidyadhar Y. Mudkavi
Computational and Theoretical Fluid Dynamics Division, National Aerospace Laboratories (CSIR), NWTC, Belur Campus, NAL, Bangalore
India


Notifications

  • Allen (T J) (1977). Managing the flow of Technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D Organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Allen (T J) (1984). Distinguishing Engineers from Scientists, In Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations, R. Katz, ed. Cambridge. M.A: Ballinger Publishing, 3-18.

  • Amabile (T M) (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity, New York, N.Y: Springer-Verlag.

  • Amabile (T M); Gryskiewicz (S S) (1987). Creativity in the R&D Laboratory, Greensboro, NC: Centre for Creative Leadership.

  • Anthony (L J); East (H); Slater (M J) (1969). The growth of the literature of Physics. Rep. Progress in Physics. Vol. (3); p709-767.

  • Blade (M F) (1963). Creativity in Engineering. In Essays on Creativity in the Sciences. M.A.Coler, ed. New York, NY: New York University Press, p110-122.

  • Brinberg (H R) (1980). The Contribution of Information to Economic Growth and Development, paper presented at the 40th congress of the International Federation for Documentation, Copenhagen, Denmark.

  • Brown (Cecelia M) (1999). Information-seeking behaviour of scientists in the electronic information age: Astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 50; p929-943.

  • Bush (V) (1945). Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

  • Cairns (R W); Compton (B E) (1970). The SATCOM Report and the Engineer?s Information Problem. Engineering Education Vol. 60; p375-376.

  • Citro (C F); Kalton (G) (1989). Surveying the Nation?s Scientists and Engineers: A Data System for the 1990s. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Constant (E W II) (1980). The origins of the Turbojet Revolution, Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Danielson (L E) (1960). Characteristics of Engineers and Scientists: Significant for Their Motivation and Utilization, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  • Dasgupta (P) (1987). The Economic Theory of Technology Policy. Chapter I in Economic Policy and Technological Performance. P. Dasgupta and P. Stoneman, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press, p7-23.

  • Florman (S C) (1987). The Civilized Engineer. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.

  • Garvey (W D) (1979). Communication: The Essence of Science. Oxford, Pergamon Press.

  • Gleeson (Amy C) (2001). Information seeking behaviour of scientists and their adaptation to electronic journals, Masters paper for the M.S. in Library Science degree, School of Information and Library Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

  • Grayson (L P) (1993). The Making of an Engineer: An Illustrated History of Engineering Education in the United States and Canada, New York, NY: John Wiley.

  • Hemant Sharma; Prem Prakash Pant (2004). Information seeking patterns of DRDE Scientists. ILA Bulletin. Vol. 40(3); p19-22.

  • Holmfeld (J D) (1970). Communication Behaviour of Scientists and Engineers, Ph.D. Dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, UMI, p70-25874.

  • Illinois Institute of Technology (1968). Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science, Washington, DC: National Science Foundation; AKA Project TRACES (Available NTIS; PB-234767.).

  • Kemper (J D) (1990). Engineers and Their Profession. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B.Saunders.

  • Kling (R); McKim (G. McKim) (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 51(14); p1306 1320.

  • Kwok (Borrée Po-Yee) (1992). The information seeking behaviour of scientists and the role played by the library in the electronic era. Diss. University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill.

  • Landau (R) Rosenberg (N) (eds.). (1986). The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • Langrish (J); Gibbons (M); Evans (W G); Jevons (F R) (1972). Wealth from Knowledge: A Study of Innovation in Industry. New York, NY: John Wiley.

  • Latour (B) (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Sociewty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Law (J); Callon (M) (1988). Engineering and Sociology in a Milirtary Aircraft Project: A Network of Analysis of Technological Change. Social Problems. Vol. 35: p115-142.

  • Layton (E T) (1974). Technology as Knowledge. Technology & Culture. Vol. 15(1); p31-33.

  • Meikins (P F); Smith (C) (1993). Organizing Engineering Work: A Comparative Analysis. Work and Occupations. Vol. 20(2); p123-146.

  • Odlyzko (Andrew) (2002). The Rapid Evolution of Scholarly Communication, AT&T Labs – Research”. Learned Publishing. Vol. 15(1); p7-19.

  • Orr (R H) (1970). The Scientist as an Information Processor: A conceptual model illustrated with data on variables related to library utilization”, In Communication among Scientists and Engineers. C.E. Nelson and D.K. Pollock, eds. Lexington, MA:D.C. Health, p143-189.

  • Peake (H J) (1969). Technical and Management Notes: Difference between Engineers and Scientists. IEEE Transactions, Eng. Mgt. EM. Vol. 15; p50-53.

  • Pinelli (T E) (1991). The Information-Seeking Habits and Practices of Engineers. Science and Technology Libraries. Vol. 11(3); p5-25.

  • Pinelli (T E) (2001). Distinguishing engineers from scientists: the case for an engineering knowledge community. Scienceand Technology Libraries. Vol. 21(3/4); p131-163.

  • Pinelli (T E); Bishop (A P) (1993). The Information Seeking Behaviour of Engineers, NASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project, Encylopedia of Library and Information Science. Vol. 52(15); p167-201; NASA-TM-109224, Paper 31.

  • Pinelli (T E); Bishop (A P); Barclay (R O); Kennedy (J M) (1993). The Information Seeking Behaviour of Engineers, NASA/DOD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project, Encylopedia of Library and Information Science. Vol. 52(15); 167-201; NASA-TM 109224 Paper; p31.

  • Pinelli (T E); Kennedy (J M); Barclay (R O) (1991). The NASA/DoD Aerospace Knowledge Diffusion Research Project, Gov. Inform. Q. Vol. 8(2); p219-233.

  • Price (de); Solla (D J) (1965). Is Technology Historically independent of AScience? Technology & Culture. Vol. 6(3); Summer; p553-578.

  • Ritti (R R) (1971). The Engineer in the Industrial Corporation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

  • Rogers (1982). Information exchange and technological innovation, Chapter 5 in the transfer and utilization of technical knowledge, D Sahal, ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Health, p105-123.

  • Salomen (J J) (1984). What is Technology? The Issue of its Origin and Definitions. History and Technology. Vol. 1(2); p113-156.

  • Shapley (D); Roy (R) (1985). Lost at the Frontieer: U.S. Science and Technology Policy AAdrift. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press.

  • Stevan Harnad (1991). Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. Public Access Computer Systems Review. Vol. 2(1); p39-53.

  • Taylor (R S) (1986). Value-Added Processes in Information Systems, Ablex Press, Norwood, NJ.

  • Tenopir (C); Hitchcock (B); Pillow (A) (2003). Use and Users of Electronic Library. Resources – An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington D.C., August.

  • Tenopir (C); King (D W) (1998). Designing Electronic Journals with 30 Years of Lessons from Print. Journal of Electronic Publishing, University of Michigan Press.

  • Tenopir (C); King (D W) (2000). Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists. Librarians, and Publishers, Psycoloquy: 11 (084) electronic journals (1); Special Libraries Association 2000, xxii+488 pp.

  • Tenopir (C); King (D W) (2001). The use and value of scientific journals: past, present andfuture. Serials. Vol. 14(2); p113-120.

  • Tenopir (C); King (D W); Boyce (P) (2003). Patterns of Journal Use by Scientists through Three Evolutionary Phases, D-Lib Magazine. Vol. 9(5).

  • U.S. Department of Defence, Office of the Director of Defence Research and Engineering. (1969)

  • Project Hindsight. Washington, DC: U.S.Department of Defence. (Available NTIS; AD-495, 905.).

  • Vincenti (W G) (1990). What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Wells (A) (1998, 1999). Exploring the development of the independent, electronic, scholarly journal, Electronic Disserations Library, Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield.

  • Willis (J) (1995). Bridging the gap between traditional and electronic scholarly publishing, paper presented at the 1995 EDUCOM Conference, Portland, Oregon (www.coe.wh.edu/~brobin/Educom95/EducomJW/ index.html).

  • Young (J F); Harriott (L C) (1979). The Changing Technical Life of Engineers. Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 101(1); January; p20-24.

  • Ziman (J) (1984). An Introduction to Science Studies: The Philosophical and Social Aspects of Science and Technology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.


Abstract Views: 207

PDF Views: 12




  • Scholarly Electronic Communication amongst the Aerospace Engineering Community and the Impact of Electronic Journals: A Review Study

Abstract Views: 207  |  PDF Views: 12

Authors

R. Guruprasad
Knowledge and Technology Management Division, National Aerospace Laboratories (CSIR), India
Khaiser Nikam
DOS, LIS, University of Mysore, India
Vidyadhar Y. Mudkavi
Computational and Theoretical Fluid Dynamics Division, National Aerospace Laboratories (CSIR), NWTC, Belur Campus, NAL, Bangalore, India

Abstract


This review paper highlights the very special „niche segment‟ to which the aerospace scientists and engineers belonging to different countries right across the globe occupy. Highlighting aviation as one of the most significant technological marvels of our times, the paper discusses in detail the various significant aspects related to what aerospace engineering is all about and how the electronic media has come in a big way to support scholarly communication within this „niche‟ aerospace engineering community. The paper also reviews the impact of Internet, the availability of high-speed networks which has enabled these scientists and engineers have access to electronic journals right at their desktops and also keep track of the global R&D happenings in their respective field of specialization. Various studies conducted (as indicated in this paper) illustrate how „electronic journals‟ are highly important to the aerospace scientists and engineers. Important studies in this connection have also proved that scientists are willing to pay a high price in their time to spend many hours reading electronic scientific literature. Many relevant studies also have revealed that the information that a scientist or engineer gets from refereed journals has greatly resulted in their improved performance. The review paper also touches upon key aspects like: (a) Distinguishing engineers from scientists, (b) Their differences in knowledge diffusion, (c) Their communication behaviours, (d) Their information seeking behaviour, (e) The aerospace engineering community in particular and the (g) the importance of scientific communication for advances in aerospace engineering and the need for electronic information resources.

Keywords


Information Processing in Science And Technology, Communication Behaviour of Scientists And Engineers, Engineers Information Seeking Behaviour, Scholarly Electronic Communication, the Aerospace Engineering Community, Impact of Electronic Journals.

References