Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Journal Ranking: The Issue of Allotting Rank Number when there is a Tie


Affiliations
1 Department of Library and Information Science, University of Burdwan, Burdwan, W.B. 713104, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Ranking studies are very popular. But different authors have followed different methods in allotting rank numbers when there is a tie. Whenever journal titles from two or more ranked lists are taken for comparison, all the lists need be ranked following same procedure. Otherwise, their rank numbers need be converted to uniform rank numbers before comparison to avoid any misleading results. When, a sample of 2891 journal references of physics having 309 journals were ranked in three different methods in vogue, and compared, it was found that the rank position of the same last journal title was 43, 176 and 309 in the three lists indicating a huge difference that could lead to quite misleading conclusion if compared unknowingly.

Whenever more than one title occupies the same number of citations, all of them should be given same rank number and the number of such titles baving same rank number should be added to decide the next rank number.


Keywords

Citation Analysis, Journal Ranking, Rank Number, Ranking, Tie.
User
About The Author

Amit Kumar Bandyopadhyay
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Burdwan, Burdwan, W.B. 713104
India


Notifications

  • Meadows (A J). Communication in science. London:Butterworths. 1974.
  • Mahapatra (Manoranjan). Growth of literature and citation pattern among the Indian journals in the field of botany: 1950-1980. Ph.D.Thesis, University of Burdwan 1983.
  • Kumbar (Mallinath) and Akhtary (Syeda). Bibliometric analysis of opthalmology literature. Library science with a saint to Documentation and Infonnationstudies Vol. 35(3); 1998; p201-207.
  • Ezhil Rani (R). A critical analysis of the bibliography of the Indian Journal of Fisheries. Library science with a saint to Documentation and Infonnation studies. Vo1.35 (2); 1998; p105-111.
  • John (Jessy). "Information needs, use pattern and use behaviour of social scientists: analytical approach through citation method", In Devarajan (G): Bibliometric studies. New Delhi:Ess Ess, 1997, p228-259.
  • Sangam (S L) and Nargund (I N)."Trend in research publications by Indian physicists: a Bibliometric analysis". In Devarajan (G): Bibliometric studies. New Delhi:EssEss Pub,1997, p.99-1l2.
  • Mete (M V) and Deshrnukh (P D). Citation analysis of Annals of Library science . and Documentation. Annals of Library science and Documentation. Vo1.43 (I); 1996; pll-25.
  • Mubeen (M A). Citation analysis of doctoral dissertations in chemistry. Annals of Library science and Documentation. Vo1.43(2); 1996; p48-58.
  • Deo (V N); Mohal (S M) and Survey (S S). Bibliometric study of doctoral dissertations on English language and literature. Annals of Library science and Documentation. Vol. 42 (3); 1995; p81-95.
  • Humayoon Kabir (S). Bibliometrics of bibliometrics. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Infonnation Studies. Vo1.32 (1); 1995; pI3-24.
  • Sarala (K R). A bibliometric analysis of the Journal of Tropical Agriculture. Library Science with a slant to Documentation and Information Studies. Vo1.32 (4); 1995; pI65.-171.
  • Aravinda (P) and Reddy (V PulIa). Physical anthropological literature: a citation analysis. lLA Bulletin. Vo1.25 (1); 1989; p19-25.
  • Singh (J P). Citation patterns of optical engineering. ILA Bulletin. Vo1.25(l); 1989; p2-36.
  • Khaiser (Jaban Begun) and Shailaja (T S). Characteristics of the literature used by the nutritionists: A citation study. Annals of Library science and Documtmtation.. VoI.32(3-4); 1985; p122-128.
  • Raju (R Elisha) and Kavitha. Core journals in synthetic organic chemistry. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. Vol.32(3-4); 1985; p1l5-121.
  • Oliveira (Silas Marques De). Citation pattern in veterinary medicine dissertations. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. Vol.31 (4); 1984; pI47-155.
  • Maheswarappa (B S) and Prakash (B P). Literature use pattern by the researchers in the field of botany: A citation study of doctoral theses. Journal of Library and lnformiltion Science. Vol.7 (1); 1982; pI5-32.
  • Arunachalam (S) and Manorama (K). Are citation based quantitative techniques adequate for measuring science on the periphery? Scientometrics. Vol.15 (5-6); 1989; p393-408.
  • Dutta Banik (B) and Bandyopadhyay (S K). Recent growth of periodicals on glass and ceramics - their rank.lASLlC Bulletin. Vo1.30 (1); 1985; p23-30.
  • Garfield (E). Highly cited works in mathematics. Part 1. "Pure mathematics". current contents; 1973. Reprinted in Garfield E: Essays of an information scientist. VI. Phila-delphia: lSI Press, 1977. p509-513.
  • Pichappan (P). Identification of mainstream journals of science speciality: A method using the discipline contribution score. Scientometrics. Vo1.27 (2); 1993; pI79-193.
  • Mccain (K W) and Bobbick (J E). Patterns of journal use in a departmental library. Journal of the American society of lnfonnation Science. Vo1.32; 1981; p258-267.
  • Dhawan (S M) and Yadav (R S). A study of most frequently c.ited journals by Indian scientists in physics. Annals of Library science and Documentation. Vol.19 (4); 1972; plB5-193.
  • Goon (A M); Gupta (M K) and Dasgupta (B). Basic statistics. Calcutta~ World Press, 1978, p227.
  • Sen (B K). Comments on two bibliographic papers (Letters to the editor). Annals of Library Science and Documentation. Vo1.44 (2); 1997; p7B-BO.

Abstract Views: 221

PDF Views: 3




  • Journal Ranking: The Issue of Allotting Rank Number when there is a Tie

Abstract Views: 221  |  PDF Views: 3

Authors

Amit Kumar Bandyopadhyay
Department of Library and Information Science, University of Burdwan, Burdwan, W.B. 713104, India

Abstract


Ranking studies are very popular. But different authors have followed different methods in allotting rank numbers when there is a tie. Whenever journal titles from two or more ranked lists are taken for comparison, all the lists need be ranked following same procedure. Otherwise, their rank numbers need be converted to uniform rank numbers before comparison to avoid any misleading results. When, a sample of 2891 journal references of physics having 309 journals were ranked in three different methods in vogue, and compared, it was found that the rank position of the same last journal title was 43, 176 and 309 in the three lists indicating a huge difference that could lead to quite misleading conclusion if compared unknowingly.

Whenever more than one title occupies the same number of citations, all of them should be given same rank number and the number of such titles baving same rank number should be added to decide the next rank number.


Keywords


Citation Analysis, Journal Ranking, Rank Number, Ranking, Tie.

References