Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison of Classification Schemes for Libraries


Affiliations
1 Cambridge University, Downing Street, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares, LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely-order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features-simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specificity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes.
User
About The Author

Susan Bury
Cambridge University, Downing Street, Cambridge, England
United Kingdom


Notifications

Abstract Views: 316

PDF Views: 4




  • Comparison of Classification Schemes for Libraries

Abstract Views: 316  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Susan Bury
Cambridge University, Downing Street, Cambridge, England, United Kingdom

Abstract


Discusses the basic criteria for comparison of classification for libraries. Identifies a set of intellectual criteria, derived from the general theory of library classification as expounded by Dewey, Bliss, and Ranganathan. Compares, LC, DC, and BC in relation criteria namely-order, university, hospitality, adaptability, terminology, relationship, synthesis, notational features-simplicity, brevity, expressiveness, specificity, synonymity, flexibility, correlation, case of use, revision and practical use. Highlights the value of comparative studies among classification schemes.