![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextgreen.png)
![Open Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_open_medium.gif)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltextred.png)
![Restricted Access](https://i-scholar.in/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/fulltext_restricted_medium.gif)
Screw in CC and UDC
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Compares the UDC and CC numbers given as the examples in Sec 8 of Paper B. Shows that CC gives co-extensive class numbers in all the 20 cases but UDC gives co-extensive class numbers only in five cases. As a result of mixed notation, CC secures the same degree of co-extensiveness of UDC with about two fifths the number of digits. It secures fully co-extensive calss numbers in all the cases with only two-thirds of the number of digits of UDC.
User
About The Author
Information
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/abstractview.png)
Abstract Views: 218
![](https://i-scholar.in/public/site/images/pdfview.png)
PDF Views: 6