Journal of Information and Knowledge (Formerly SRELS Journal of Information Management)

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Social Media and Libraries:A Scientometric Assessment of World Output, 2003-2014


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S.Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110 012, India
2 National Physical Lab, New Delhi, India
3 Indian Institute of Science, Education and Research, Mohali - 140 306, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The paper examines 1472 global publications on "social media and libraries" covering the period 2003-14 on a series of indicators. The publications output averaged 62% annual growth. These 1472 global publications received 5350 citations since their publication, averaging 1.68 citations per paper. Only 47.55% publications were cited one or more times. The contribution of top most productive countries (namely USA, U.K., Canada, Spain, Germany, China, Australia, India, Netherlands and Singapore) together accounted for 74.86% share. Netherlands registered the highest share (38.89%) of international collaborative papers among the top 10 countries during 2003-14. The top 15 organizations out of 293 accounted for 12.57% share. The top 10 authors out of 410 accounted for 4.96% share during 2003-14. Journals (57%) and conference proceedings (26.09%) contributed the largest share to global output during 2003-14. The top 15 journals contributed 290 publications(34.20%) during 2003-14. The top 10 most highly cited papers received 1094 citations, from 51 to 401 citations per paper. Blogs contributed the largest share (34.99%) of publications among social media sites, followed by Wikipedia (19.97%), Facebook (13.65%) and others.

Keywords

Assessment, Citation Analysis, Library, Social Media, Scintometrics.
User
About The Authors

B. M. Gupta
National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S.Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110 012
India

S. M. Dhawan
National Physical Lab, New Delhi
India

P. Visakhi
Indian Institute of Science, Education and Research, Mohali - 140 306, Punjab
India


Notifications

  • Social media (2015). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media on 6 April 2015.

  • Kaplan, A.M. andHaenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1): 61.doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.

  • Kietzmann, H.J. and Kristopher, H. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54: 241–251. doi:10.1016/J.BUSHOR.2011.01.005.

  • Davis, III C.H.; Deil-Amen, R.; Rios-Aguilar, C. and Gonzalez Canche, M.S. (2012). Social media in higher education: A literature review and research direction. Claremont Graduate University. Retrieved fromhttp//works.bepress.com/egi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1003&context=hfdavis(Accessed on 22 August 2014).

  • Constantinides, E. and Fountain, S.J. (2008). Web 2.0: Cenceptual foundation and marketing issues. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 9(3): 231–244.

  • White, M.G. (2006-15). What Types of Social Networks Exist?Retrieved from http://webcache.googleusercontent.co/search?q=cache:mzNacrIimegJ:socialnetworking.lovetoknow.com/What_Types_of_Social_Networks_Exist+& cd=13&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in

  • Rutherford, L.L. (2008). Building participative library services: The impact of social software use in public libraries.Library High Tech, 26(3): 411–423.

  • Tiffen, B. and England, A. (2011) Engaging with clients and personalizing services at UTS Library: Measuring the value of libraries and their clients. The Australian Library Journal, 60(3): 237–247.

  • Mack, D.;Behler, A.B.R. and Rimland, E. (2007). Reaching students with Facebook: Data and best practices.Electronic Journal of Academic & Special Librarianship, 8(2). Retrieved from. http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/ v08n02/mack_d01.htmlon 6 July 2015

  • Phillips, N.K. (2011). Academic library use of Facebook: Building relationship with students. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6): 512–522.

  • Xia, Z.D. (2009). Marketing library services through face book groups. Library Management, 30(6-7): 469–47.

  • London, L. and Hall, H. (2010). From triviality to business tool: The case of Twitter in library and information services delivery. Business Information Review, 27(4): 236–241.

  • Breeding, M. (2009).Social networking strategies for professionals. Computers in Libraries October, 29(9): 29–31.

  • Hall, H.(2011). Relationship and role transformations in social media environments. The Electronic Library, 29(4): 421–28.

  • Bradley, P. (2015). Social media for creative libraries: How to maximise Impact and Reach. London; Facet Publishing. July 2015.

  • American Library Association. (2012). State of America’s Libraries Report 2012.Section on social networking. Chicago. 2012, p. 34.

  • Jain, P. (2014). Application of social media in marketing library and information services: A global perspective. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 2(2): 25.

  • Khan, S.A. andBhatti, R. (2012). Application of social media in marketing of library and information services: A case study from Pakistan. Webology, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.webology.org/2012/v9n1/a93.html

  • Taylor and Francis Group. (2014). Use of social media by library: Current practices and future opportunities. October 2014.

  • Coursaris, C.K. and Van Osch, W. (2014). A scientometric analysis of social media research(2004-2011). Scientometrics, 101(1): 357–389.

  • Chunmei, G. and Weijun, W. (2014). A Bibliometric Analysis of Social Media Research from the Perspective of Library and Information Science. Digital Services and Information Intelligence. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 445:23–32.


Abstract Views: 374

PDF Views: 22




  • Social Media and Libraries:A Scientometric Assessment of World Output, 2003-2014

Abstract Views: 374  |  PDF Views: 22

Authors

B. M. Gupta
National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies, Dr K.S.Krishnan Marg, New Delhi - 110 012, India
S. M. Dhawan
National Physical Lab, New Delhi, India
P. Visakhi
Indian Institute of Science, Education and Research, Mohali - 140 306, Punjab, India

Abstract


The paper examines 1472 global publications on "social media and libraries" covering the period 2003-14 on a series of indicators. The publications output averaged 62% annual growth. These 1472 global publications received 5350 citations since their publication, averaging 1.68 citations per paper. Only 47.55% publications were cited one or more times. The contribution of top most productive countries (namely USA, U.K., Canada, Spain, Germany, China, Australia, India, Netherlands and Singapore) together accounted for 74.86% share. Netherlands registered the highest share (38.89%) of international collaborative papers among the top 10 countries during 2003-14. The top 15 organizations out of 293 accounted for 12.57% share. The top 10 authors out of 410 accounted for 4.96% share during 2003-14. Journals (57%) and conference proceedings (26.09%) contributed the largest share to global output during 2003-14. The top 15 journals contributed 290 publications(34.20%) during 2003-14. The top 10 most highly cited papers received 1094 citations, from 51 to 401 citations per paper. Blogs contributed the largest share (34.99%) of publications among social media sites, followed by Wikipedia (19.97%), Facebook (13.65%) and others.

Keywords


Assessment, Citation Analysis, Library, Social Media, Scintometrics.

References