Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Output & Productivity Growth Decomposition:A Panel Study of Manufacturing Industries in India


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Economics, Midnapore College (Autonomous), Midnapore-721101, W.B., India
2 Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
3 Dept. of Economics With Rural Development, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, Paschim Medinipur (W.B.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper decomposes output and productivity growth of thirteen 2-digit manufacturing industries as well as total manufacturing industry in India during 1981-82 to 2010-11. The four attributes of output growth are input growth, adjusted scale effect, technological progress and technical efficiency growth. A stochastic frontier model with a translog production function is used to estimate the growth attributes of the manufacturing industries. The results show that input growth is the major contributor to output growth whereas total factor productivity growth (TFPG) sometimes remains inadequate even though it has a positive and significant effect on output growth. Technological progress is found to be the major contributor to TFPG and the scale effect has become important during recent years.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aigner, D.J.,C.A.K. Lovell & P. Schmidt (1977), “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models”, Journal of Econometrics, 6 (1): 21-37.

  • Battese, G.E. & T.J. Coelli (1988), “Prediction of Farm Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data,” Journal of Econometrics, 38 (3): 387-399.

  • Battese, G.E. & T.J. Coelli (1992), “Frontier Production Functions, Technical Efficiency and Panel Data: With Application to Paddy Farmars in India”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 3(1/2): 153-69.

  • Battese, G.E. & T.J. Coelli (1995), “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in the Stochastic Frontier Production for Panel Data”, Empirical Economics, 20(2): 325-32.

  • Bauer, P. W.(1990), “Decomposing TFP Growth in the Presence of Cost Inefficiency, Non-constant Returns to Scale, and Technological Progress”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1(4): 287-99.

  • Coelli, T.J. (1996), “A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation”, CEPA Working Paper, 7/96, Dept. of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale.

  • Coelli, T. J., D. Rao, S. Prasada & G.E. Battese (1998), An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

  • CSO (2007), National Account Statistics, Government of India, New Delhi.

  • Denny, M., Fuss, M. & Waverman, L. (1981), “The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries with an Application to Canadian Telecommunications” in T. G. Cowing and R. E. Stevenson (eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, New York: Academic Press.

  • Greene, W. (2005), “Reconsidering Heterogeneity in Panel Data Estimators of the Stochastic Frontier Model”, Journal of Econometrics, 126 (2): 269-303.

  • Jorgenson, Dale & Z. Griliches (1967), “The Explanation of Productivity Change”, The Review of Economic Studies, 34 (3): 249-80.

  • Kim, Sangho & Gwanho Han (2001), “A Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in Korean Manufacturing Industries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach,” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 16(3): 269-81.

  • Kumbhakar, S.C (1990), “Production Frontiers, Panel Data and Time-varying Technical Inefficiency,” Journal of Econometrics, 46(1/2): 201-12.

  • Kumbhakar, S.C & C.A.Knox Lovell (2000), Stochastic Frontier Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Li Kui-Wai & Tung Liu (2011), “Economic and Productivity Growth Decomposition: An Application to Post-reform China,” Economic Modeling, 28: 366-73.

  • Minh, N. K., P.V. Khanh, N.T. Minh & N.T.P. Anh (2012), “Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Efficiency Change in Vietnamese Manufacturing Industries: A Stochastic Frontier Approach,” Open Journal of Statistics, 2(April): 224-235.

  • OECD (2001), “Productivity and Firm Dynamics: Evidence From Microdata,” Economic Outlook, 69: 209-33.

  • Roy, P.K., P.S. Das, and C. Neogi (2015), “Interstate Analysis of the Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in the Organized Manufacturing Industries in India: A Stochastic Frontier Approach,” Artha Vijnana, LVII (2):135-60.

  • Roy P. K., P. S. Das & Pal M.K. (2016), “Productivity Growth in Indian Manufacturing: Panel Estimation of Stochastic Production Frontier”, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(1):.71-86.

  • Sharma, S.C; K. Sylwester & H. Margono (2007), “Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth in U.S. States,” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 47(2): 215-41.

  • Solow, Robert M (1957), “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function”, The Review of Economics and Statistics,” 39(3): 312-20.


Abstract Views: 374

PDF Views: 1




  • Output & Productivity Growth Decomposition:A Panel Study of Manufacturing Industries in India

Abstract Views: 374  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Prasanta Kumar Roy
Dept. of Economics, Midnapore College (Autonomous), Midnapore-721101, W.B., India
Purnendu Sekhar Das
Vinod Gupta School of Management, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
Mihir Kumar Pal
Dept. of Economics With Rural Development, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore, Paschim Medinipur (W.B.), India

Abstract


This paper decomposes output and productivity growth of thirteen 2-digit manufacturing industries as well as total manufacturing industry in India during 1981-82 to 2010-11. The four attributes of output growth are input growth, adjusted scale effect, technological progress and technical efficiency growth. A stochastic frontier model with a translog production function is used to estimate the growth attributes of the manufacturing industries. The results show that input growth is the major contributor to output growth whereas total factor productivity growth (TFPG) sometimes remains inadequate even though it has a positive and significant effect on output growth. Technological progress is found to be the major contributor to TFPG and the scale effect has become important during recent years.

References