Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Legal Provisions of Collective Bargaining:Contrasting India With Canada, China & Finland


Affiliations
1 Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper examines the legal provisions of collective bargaining in India, Canada, China and Finland. The legal provisions and protocol related to collective bargaining in India are discussed with certain rulings of the court. The dearth of central level legislation on the subject has been highlighted along with the criteria of recognizing a trade union. An analysis of characteristics of Canadian, Chinese and Finnish collective bargaining is presented in comparison to India. The conclusion emphasizes on strengthening of collective bargaining mechanism in India in the light of collective bargaining systems of these nations.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Carter, D C. (1995), “Collective Bargaining Legislation in Union Management Relations in Canada”, in M Gunderson and A. Ponak (Eds), Union-management Relations in Canada, Third Edition, Addison-Wesley, Toronto.

  • Chan, C. K. C. & Hui, E. S. I. (2014), “The Development of Collective Bargaining in China: From “Collective Bargaining by Riot” to “Party State-led Wage Bargaining”, The China Quarterly, 217: 221-42.

  • Farrell, M. (2012), “Collective Bargaining in Canada”, Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy, (3): 47.

  • Foster, L. P. (2017), Learning Networks as a Tool for Good Governance: The Case of the Canada-China Forum on Industrial Relations and Employment Standards, Asia Pacific Dispute Resolution Project (APDR) Working Paper Series No 16-6, York University, 2017.

  • Gunderson, M. & Ponak, A. M. (1995), Unionmanagement Relations in Canada, Addison Wesley Publishing Company, Toronto.

  • Hayter, S. (2010), “International Comparative Trends in Collective Bargaining”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 45 (4): 596-608.

  • International Labor Office (1960), Collective Bargaining (A Worker’s Education Manual).

  • Liu, M. & Kuruvilla, S. (2016), “The State, the Unions, and Collective Bargaining in China: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”, Comparative Labor Law Journal & Policy Journal, 38: 187.

  • Mitchell, R., Petra, M. A. H. Y. & Gahan, P. (2014), “The Evolution of Labor Law in India: an Overview and Commentary on Regulatory Objectives and Development”, Asian Journal of Law and Society, 1(02): 413-53.

  • Prasad, S. N. (2012), Case Study: Labor Unrest at Manesar Plant of Maruti Suzuki in 2012, A Perspective, Cases in Management, SDMIMD, Mysore.

  • http://planningcommission.nic.in/plans/planrel/fiveyr/3rd/3planch15.html

  • http://www.the-laws.com/Encyclopedia/Browse/Case?CaseId=000691980000

  • https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1870278 www.expat-finland.com/pdf/finnish_labour_legislation.pdf


Abstract Views: 261

PDF Views: 0




  • Legal Provisions of Collective Bargaining:Contrasting India With Canada, China & Finland

Abstract Views: 261  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sunil Budhiraja
Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
Ujjwal Kumar Pathak
Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

Abstract


This paper examines the legal provisions of collective bargaining in India, Canada, China and Finland. The legal provisions and protocol related to collective bargaining in India are discussed with certain rulings of the court. The dearth of central level legislation on the subject has been highlighted along with the criteria of recognizing a trade union. An analysis of characteristics of Canadian, Chinese and Finnish collective bargaining is presented in comparison to India. The conclusion emphasizes on strengthening of collective bargaining mechanism in India in the light of collective bargaining systems of these nations.

References