Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Gandhian Trusteeship & CSR:Interrogating the Relationship


Affiliations
1 Department of Social Work, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often considered a contested concept. In India its contours have finally been marked through the Companies Act, 2013. The Act clarifies what may constitute the social responsibility of business. It goes further to explain which category of corporate shall undertake socially responsible initiatives. This paper takes a critical look at the Gandhian idea of trusteeship and CSR to understand the relationship between the two. The paper concludes that the two are different because the two concepts lie in two different world views. While the idea of trusteeship derives its strength from religion and the basic goodness of human beings CSR as proposed and practiced today has its ischolar_mains in the market economy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aras, G. & Crowther, D. (2008), Corporate Social Responsibility, Ventus Publishing ApS. Retrieved 2018, from https://kantakji.com/media/3473/z126.pdf

  • Carroll, A. (1994), “Social Issues in Management Research”, Business and Society , 33(1): 5-25.

  • Chakrabarty, B. (2015), “Universal Benefit: Gandhi’s Doctrine of Trusteeship : A Review Article”. Modern Asian Studies, 49(2): 572-608.

  • Das Gupta, A. (1968), “Gandhi on Soial Conflict”, Economic and Political Weekly , 3(49): 1876-78.

  • Das Gupta, A. (1996), Gandhi’s Economic Thought, London: Routledge.

  • Department of Public Enterprises, Government of India. (2010), Guidelines on Corporate Social Responsibility for Central Public Sector Enterprises. Government of India

  • Department of Public Enterprises, Government of India. (2013), Guidelines on Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability for Central Public Sector Enterprises Government of India.

  • Gallie, W.B. (1956), “Essentially Contested Concepts”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 167-98., Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4544562

  • Gandhi, M.K. (1935, June 01). Harijan: 121-22.

  • Gandhi, M.K. (1938), Harijan : 162.

  • Gandhi, M.K. (1939, June 03), “Theory of Trusteeship”, Harijan: 145.

  • Gandhi, M.K. (1940, August 25). Harijan: 28.

  • Gandhi, M.K. (1942), “Trusteeship”, Harijan: 20.

  • Gandhi, M.K. (n.d.), Labour and Capital, Retrieved from https://www.mkgandhi.org/momgandhi/chap41.htm

  • Gandhi, M.K. (n.d.), Trusteeship, Navajivan Mudranalaya, Ahemadabad

  • Ghosh, S. (1989), “Trusteeship in Industry: Gandhiji’s Dream and Contemporary Reality”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 25(1): 35-44.

  • Kassam, M., Handy, F. & Janson, E. (2016), Philanthropy in India: Promise to Practice, New Delhi: Sage.

  • Koshal, R. K. & Koshal, M. (1973), “Gandhian Economic Philosophy”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 32(2): 191– 210.

  • Merchant, V. (n d), Gandhiji on Trusteeship Management. Mumbai: Leaders Press Private Limited.

  • Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India. (2009), Corporate Social Responsibility Voluntary Guidelines, Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Retrieved from http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/CSR_Voluntary_Guidelines_24dec2009.pdf

  • Pandya, A. (1978, July 1), “Gandhi and Agrarian Classs”, Economic and Political Weekly: 1077-79.

  • Rolnick, P. (1962). Charity, Trusteeship, and Social Change in India: A Study of a Political Ideology. World Politics, 14(3), 439-460. doi:10.2307/2009362.

  • Sharma, S. (2011), “Corporate Social Responsibility in India”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(4): 637-49.

  • Sharma, S. (2013), “Corporate Social Responsibility in India- The Emerging Discourse & Concerns”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(4 ): 582-96.

  • Sharma, Seema & Mann, Deepa. (2016), “Communication for Socially Responsible Initiatives”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(1): 87-100.

  • Spector, B. (2008), “Business Responsibilities in a Divided World: The Cold War Roots of the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement”, Enterprise and Society, 9(2): 314-36.

  • Sundar, P. (2013), Business and Community: The Story of Corporate Social Responsibility in India. New Delhi: Sage.

  • Tendulkar, D. (1953), Mahatma [1934-1938] Volume 4, The Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.

  • Tendulkar, D. G. (1953), Mahatma [1940-1945] Volume 5, The Publications Division,Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.

  • World Bank Group. (2002), Public Sector Roles in Strengthening Corporate Social Responsibility; Taking Stock, Washington DC, USA: WBG.

  • World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2002), Corporate Social Responsbility: The WBCSD’s Journey, WBCSD. Retrieved from https://www.globalhand.org/en/browse/csr/resource/document/27942


Abstract Views: 244

PDF Views: 0




  • Gandhian Trusteeship & CSR:Interrogating the Relationship

Abstract Views: 244  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Seema Sharma
Department of Social Work, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India

Abstract


Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is often considered a contested concept. In India its contours have finally been marked through the Companies Act, 2013. The Act clarifies what may constitute the social responsibility of business. It goes further to explain which category of corporate shall undertake socially responsible initiatives. This paper takes a critical look at the Gandhian idea of trusteeship and CSR to understand the relationship between the two. The paper concludes that the two are different because the two concepts lie in two different world views. While the idea of trusteeship derives its strength from religion and the basic goodness of human beings CSR as proposed and practiced today has its ischolar_mains in the market economy.

References