Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Women Organization Commitment:Role of the Second Career & Their Leadership Styles


Affiliations
1 K J Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research, Mumbai, India
2 The Employee Connect, Mumbai, India
3 Great Place to Work® Institute, India
4 SBI Life Insurance, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Thepaper focuses on two issues of career women. First, the challenges of the second career which is often filled with uncertainty and stagnation. Second the perception that leadership style is based on gender. The paper is based on two short studies each addressing one of the problems mentioned above. In the first study, the perceived organization support is the independent variable and organization commitment is the dependent variable. Results show that women who opted for the second career and got the support of the organization also showed organization commitment. In the second study, leadership style was the independent variable and commitment was the dependent variable. The results showed that gender did not influence leadership style pointing at the androgynous leadership style of women.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990), “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1): 1-18.

  • Bass, B. M. (1990),Bass and Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications(3rd ed.), New York, FreePress.

  • Bem, B.M. (1974), “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny’’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2); 155-62

  • Bem, S. L. (1974), The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2): 155

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979),The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

  • Cook, E. P., Heppner, M. J.& O’Brian, M. (2002),”Career Development of Women of Color and White Women: Assumptions, Conceptualizations, and Interventions from an Ecological Perspective”,The Career Development Quarterly, 20: 291-305.

  • Crozier, S. (1999), “Women’s Career Development in a ‘Relational Context’”, Interna tional Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 21: 231-47

  • Cuadrado, I., Morales, J. F. &Recio, P. (2008),”Women’s Access to Managerial Positions: An Experimental Study of Leadership Styles and Gender”, The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(1): 55-65.

  • Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987), “Putting Gender into Context: An Interactive Model of Genderrelated Behavior”, Psychological Review, 94(3); 369.

  • Dumdum, U. R., Lowe, K. B., Avolio, B. J.&Yammarino, F. J. (2002), Transformational and Charismatic leadership: The Road Ahead, Oxford, UK: JAI/Elsevier

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987a),”Reporting Sex Differences”, American Psychologist, 42: 755-56 .

  • Eagly, A. H. & Carli, L. L. (2003a), “The Female Leadership Advantage: An Evaluation of the Evidence”, Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 807–34.

  • Eagly, A. H.& Carli, L. L. (2003b), “Finding Gender Advantage and Disadvantage: Systematic Research Integration Is the Solution”, Leadership Quarterly, 14(6): 851–59.

  • Eagly, A. H.&Johannese, Schmidt, M. C. (2001), “The leadership styles of women and men”, Journal of Social Issues, 57(4): 781797.

  • Eisenberger, R. &Stinglhamber, F. (2011), Perceived organizational Support: Fostering Enthusiastic and Productive Employees. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S.& Sowa, D. (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3): 500.

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960), “The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement”, American Sociological Review, 25(2):161-78.

  • Hewlett, S. A., Luce, C. B., Shiller, P. &Southwell, S. (2005), The Hidden Brain Drain: OffRamps and On-ramps in Women’s Careers, Harvard Business School Press

  • Judge, T. A.& Piccolo, R. F. (2004),”Transformational and Transactional Leadership: a Meta-analytic Test of Their Relative Validity”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5): 755.

  • Kent, R. L.& Moss, S. E. (1994), “Effects of Sex and Gender Role on Leader Emergence”, Academy of Management Journal, 37(5): 1335-46.

  • Kolb, J. (1997), “Are We Still Stereotyping Leadership? A Look at Gender and Other Predictors of Leader Emergence’’, Small Group Research, 28(3): 370-93.

  • Korabik, K., Baril, G. L.& Watson, C. (1993),”Managers’ Conflict Management Style and Leadership Effectiveness: The Moderating Effects of Gender”, Sex Roles, 29(5-6): 405–20.

  • Lovejoy, M.& Stone, P. (2012),”Opting Back In: The Influence of Time at Home on Professional Women’s Career Redirection after Opting Out”, Gender, Work & Organization, 19(6): 631-53

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G.& Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996), “Effectiveness Correlates of Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-analytic Review of the MLQ Literature”, The Leadership Quarterly, 7(3): 385-425.

  • McCracken, D. M. (2000), “Winning the Talent War for Women: Sometimes It Takes a Revolution”, Harvard Business Review, 78(6): 159-67

  • Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991), “A Threecomponent Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, Human Resource Management Review, 1(1): 61-89.

  • Molero, F., Cuadrado, I., Navas, M.& Morales, J. F. (2007), “Relations and Effects of Transformational Leadership: A Comparative Analysis with Traditional Leadership Styles”,The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2): 358–68.

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L. W. (1979), “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2): 224-47.

  • Rhoades, L.&Eisenberger, R. (2002),”Perceived Organizational Support: a Review of the Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4): 698.

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1992), Gender, Interaction, and Inequality,New York, Springer.

  • Shore, L. M. & Shore, T. H. (1995),”Perceived Organizational Support and Organizational Justice”, in R. S. Cropanzano & K. M. Kacmar (Eds.), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Work Place, Westport, CT, Quorum.

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R.& Stapp, J. (1975),”Ratings of Self and Peers on Sex Role Attributes and Their Relation to Selfesteem and Conceptions of Masculinity and Femininity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1): 29.

  • Unger, R. K. (1979),”Toward a Redefinition of Sex and Gender”, American Psychologist, 34(11): 1085.

  • Van Engen, M. L. &Willemsen, T. K. (2004),”Sex and Leadership Styles: A Meta-analysis of Research Published in the 1990s”, Psychological Reports,94: 3–18.

  • Wood, W.&Eagly, A. H. (2010),”Gender”, in S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology(5th ed., Vol. 10, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.


Abstract Views: 201

PDF Views: 0




  • Women Organization Commitment:Role of the Second Career & Their Leadership Styles

Abstract Views: 201  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Preeti S. Rawat
K J Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research, Mumbai, India
Sanjay Kumar Rawat
The Employee Connect, Mumbai, India
Arfa Sheikh
Great Place to Work® Institute, India
Ankita Kotwal
SBI Life Insurance, India

Abstract


Thepaper focuses on two issues of career women. First, the challenges of the second career which is often filled with uncertainty and stagnation. Second the perception that leadership style is based on gender. The paper is based on two short studies each addressing one of the problems mentioned above. In the first study, the perceived organization support is the independent variable and organization commitment is the dependent variable. Results show that women who opted for the second career and got the support of the organization also showed organization commitment. In the second study, leadership style was the independent variable and commitment was the dependent variable. The results showed that gender did not influence leadership style pointing at the androgynous leadership style of women.

References