Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Modeling International Trinity & Policy Choices for India


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh-160014, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study is an attempt to test the validity of trinity hypothesis and to measure the cost of capital account convertibility which Indian economy has paid in the form of one of the cornerns of trinity triangle. The monthly data obtained from various publications of RBI and IMF over the period 1980:M1 to 2016:M12 have been utilized to construct three trinity indices of Monetary Independence (MI), Exchange Rate Stability (ERS), and Capital Account Openness (CO).Using the graphical and cointegration tools, the existence of trinity hypothesis has been confirmed in Indian context. It has been noticed that India has clearly chosen capital openness (CO) over exchange rate stability (ERS).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aizenman, J. & Ito, H. (2011), “The ‘Impossible Trinity,’ the International Monetary Framework, and the Pacific Rim”, Forthcoming in Kaur and N. Singh (ed.,) Handbook of the Economics of the Pacific Rim.
  • Aizenman, J. & Lee, J. (2007), “International Reserves: Precautionary versus Mercantilist Views, Theory and Evidence”, Open Economies Review”, 18(2):191-214.
  • Aizenman, J. & Lee, J. (2008), “Financial versus Monetary Mercantilism: Long run View of Large International Reserves Hoarding”, The World Economy, 31 (5): 593-611.
  • Aizenman, J, (2010), “The Impossible Trinity (aka The Policy Trilemma)”, forthcoming in the Encyclopedia of Financial Globalization.
  • Aizenman, J. (2013), “The Impossible Trinity— from the Policy Trilemma to the Policy Quadrilemma”, Global Journal of Economics, 2(01): 1350001
  • Aizenman, J. Chinn, M.D. & Ito, H. (2013), “The ‘Impossible Trinity’ Hypothesis in an Era of Global Imbalances: Measurement and Testing”, Review of International Economics, 21 (3):447-58.
  • Amadou, N. R. S. (2007), “ The Capital Account Liberalization and Risk Management in India”, No. WP/07/251, International Monetary Fund
  • Asteriou, D. & Hall, G.S. (2007), “Applied Econometrics: a Modern Approach”, Palgrave Macmillan. New York.
  • Charemza, W.W.& Deadman, D.F. (1997), “New Directions in Econometric Practice”, Second Edn, Edward Elgar Publishing, Chelthenham, UK
  • Fleming, J.M. (1962), “Domestic Financial Policies under Fixed and under Floating Exchange Rates”, Staff Papers, 9(3): 369-80.
  • Gupta, A.S. & Manjhi, G. (2011), ”Capital Flows and the Impossible Trinity: The Indian Experience (No. 11-02)”, Centre for International Trade and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.
  • Hagen, J.V. & Zhou, J. (2005), “The Choice of Exchange Rate Regime: an Empirical Analysis for Transition Economies”, Economics of Transition”, 13 (4): 679-703.
  • Hosny, A.S., Kishor, N.K. & Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (2015), “Understanding the Dynamics of the Macroeconomic Trilemma”, International Review of Applied Economics, 29 (1): 32-64.
  • Hutchison, M., Sengupta, R., & Singh, N. (2012), “India’s Trilemma: Financial Liberalization, Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy 1", The World Economy, 35(1): 3-18.
  • Joshi, V. (2001), “Capital Controls and the National Advantage: India in the 1990s and Beyond”, Oxford Development Studies, 29(3): 305-20.
  • Joshi, V. (2003), “India and the Impossible Trinity”, The World Economy, 26(4): 555-83
  • Lütkepohl, H. (2005), “New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis”, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany
  • Moreno, R. & Spiegel, M.M. (1997), “Are Asian Economies Exempt from the ‘Impossible Trinity?: Evidence from Singapore”, (No. 97-01), Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
  • Mundell, R.A. (1963), “Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates”, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique, 29(4):475-85.
  • Obstfeld, M., Shambaugh, J.C. & Taylor, A.M.(2004), “Monetary Sovereignty, Exchange Rates, and Capital Controls: the Trilemma in the Interwar Period”, IMF Staff Papers, 51 (1): 75-108.
  • Obstfeld, M. Shambaugh, J.C. & Taylor, A.M. (2005), “The Trilemma in History: Tradeoffs among Exchange Rates, Monetary Policies, and Capital Mobility”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3):423-38.
  • Padmanabhan, G. (2015), “Is India Ready for Full Capital Account Convertibility?” Speech at the MSNM Besant Institute of PG Management Studies, 16 May 2015, Mangalore
  • Patil, R.H. (1999), “Risks of Capital Account Convertibility”, Economics and Political Weekly. 34 (1-2): 16-23.
  • Philippon, M.T., Zettelmeyer, M.J. & Borensztein, M.E. (2001), “Monetary Independence in Emerging Markets: Does the Exchange Rate Regime Make a Difference?” (No. 1). International Monetary Fund
  • Quadrini, V. (2005), “Policy Commitment and the Welfare Gains from Capital Market Liberalization”, European Economic Review, 49 (8):1927-51.
  • Ramakrishna, G. (2012), “The Capital Account Convertibility in India: The Impact of Capital Inflows on Economic Growth, Exports and Imports”, The International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 3 (2): 80-95.
  • Seth, A.K. & Varma, S. (2009), “Capital Account Convertibility and Growth: A Developing Country Perspective”, Decision (03040941), (36):.1.
  • Shambaugh, J.C. (2004), “The Effect of Fixed Exchange Rates on Monetary Policy”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119.(1):301-52.

Abstract Views: 189

PDF Views: 0




  • Modeling International Trinity & Policy Choices for India

Abstract Views: 189  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Nitin Arora
Department of Economics, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh-160014, India
Ramandeep Kaur
Department of Economics, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh-160014, India

Abstract


This study is an attempt to test the validity of trinity hypothesis and to measure the cost of capital account convertibility which Indian economy has paid in the form of one of the cornerns of trinity triangle. The monthly data obtained from various publications of RBI and IMF over the period 1980:M1 to 2016:M12 have been utilized to construct three trinity indices of Monetary Independence (MI), Exchange Rate Stability (ERS), and Capital Account Openness (CO).Using the graphical and cointegration tools, the existence of trinity hypothesis has been confirmed in Indian context. It has been noticed that India has clearly chosen capital openness (CO) over exchange rate stability (ERS).

References