Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Process Framework for Development of Performance Management System


Affiliations
1 Human Resource Management XLRI Xavier School of Management, C H Area, Jamshedpur 831035, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper proposes a new process framework to develop a performance management system aligned to the context of knowledge based teams. Synthesis of literature and conceptual integration is the approach adopted to develop the framework. Firstly, the unique characteristics and the resulting work requirements of knowledge based teams are discussed. Secondly, based on these requirements the most suitable theoretical model for knowledge based teams is identified from literature. Finally, based on the fundamentals of the theoretical model, a new conceptual framework is proposed. The attributes of commitment based human resource management are argued to be the most suited theoretical model for knowledge based teams.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aguinis, Herman & Charles Pierce (2008), “Enhancing the Relevance of Organizational Behavior by Embracing Performance Management Research,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29 (1): 139-45.

  • Alavi, Maryam & Dorothy E. Leidner (2001), “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues,” MIS Quarterly, 25 (1): 107-36.

  • Amaratunga, Dilanthi & David Baldry, (2002), “Moving from Performance Measurement to Performance Management”, Facilities, 20 (5/6): 217-23.

  • Anand, N, Heidi K Gardner & Tim Morris (2007), “Knowledge-Based Innovation: Emergence and Embedding of New Practice Areas in Management Consulting Firms”, The Academy of Management Journal 50 (2): 406-28.

  • Arthur, Jeffrey B. (1994), “Effects of Human Resource Systems on Manufacturing Performance and Turnover”, The Academy of Management Journal 37 (3): 670-87.

  • Batt, Rosemary (2002), “Managing Customer Services: Human Resource Practices, Quit Rates, and Sales Growth”, The Academy of Management Journal, 45 (3): 587-97.

  • Bourne, Mike, Andy Neely, John Mills & Ken Platts (2003), “Implementing Performance Measurement Systems: a Literature Review”, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5 (1): 1-24.

  • Boxall, Peter & Keith Macky (2009), “Research and Theory on High-performance Work Systems: Progressing the High Involvement”, Human Resource Management Journal 19 (1): 3-23.

  • Broadbent, Jane & Richard Laughlin (2009), “Performance Management Systems: A Conceptual Model”, Management Accounting Research, 20 (4): 283-95.

  • Buckingham, Marcus & Ashley Goodall (2015), “Reinventing Performance Management.” Harvard Business Review, 93 (4): 40-50.

  • Cervenka, Michal (2012), “Organizational Influence on Effectivity of Knowledge Application by Knowledge Workers: An Attention Based Approach”, Economics and Management 17 (2): 719-25.

  • Ceylan, Canan (2013), “Commitment-based HR Practices, Different Types of Innovation Activities and Firm Innovation Performance”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24 (1): 208-26.

  • Chadwick, Clint, Janice F Super & Kiwook Kwon (2015), “Resource Orchestration in Practice: CEO Emphasis on SHRM, Commitment Based HR Systems and Firm Performance.” Strategic Management Journal, 36 (3): 360-76.

  • Collins, Christopher J & Ken G Smith (2006), “Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High Technology Firms”, Academy of Management Journal, 49 (3): 544-60.

  • Denisi, Angelo & Catlin E Smith (2014) “Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research”, The Academy of Management Annals, 8 (1): 127-79.

  • Deschamps, Carl & Jan Mattijs (2015), “Anatomy of Performance Management System: the Elusive Path from Targets to Productivity”, CEB Working Paper 15

  • Farndale, Elaine & Clarke Kelliher (2013), “Implementing Performance Appraisal: Exploring the Employee Experience”, Human Resource Management, 52 (6): 879– 897

  • Flapper, Simme Douwe, Leonard Fortuin & Paul P.M Stoop (1996), “Towards Consistent Performance Management Systems”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16 (7): 27-37

  • Grant, Robert M. 1996. “Toward a KnowledgeBased Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal, 17 (S2): 109-22.

  • Kim, Sunghoon & Patrick M Wright (2010), “Putting Strategic Human Resource Management in Context: A Contextualized Model of High Commitment Work Systems and Its Implications in China”, Management and Organization Review ,7 (1): 153–74

  • Kinnie, Nicholas, Sue Hutchinson, John Purcell & Bruce Rayton (2005), “Satisfaction with HR Practices and Commitment to the Organization: Why One Size Does Not Fit All”, Human Resource Management Journal, 15 (4): 9-29.

  • Kloot, Louise & John Martin (2000), “Strategic Performance Management: A Balanced Approach to Performance Management Issues in Local Government”, Management Accounting Research, 11 (2): 231–51.

  • Lepak, David & Scott A. Snell (2002), “Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations”, Journal of Management, 28 (4): 517–43

  • March, James G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning”, Organization Science, 2 (1): 71-87.

  • McClean, Elizabeth & Christopher J Collins (2011), “High Commitment HR Practices, Employee Effort and Firm Performance: Investigating the Effect of HR Practices Across Employee Groups within professional Services Firm.”, Human Resource Management, 50 (3): 341 – 63.

  • Nishii, Lisa H, David P Lepak & Benjamin Schneider (2008), “Employee Attributions of the “Why” of HR Practices: Their Effects on Employee Attitudes and Behaviors, and Customer Satisfaction”, Personnel Psychology, 61 (3): 503-45.

  • Poocharoen, Ora-Orn & Norma Hoi-lam Wong (2016), “Performance Management of Collaborative Projects: The Stronger the Collaboration, the Less Is Measured”, Public Performance & Management Review, 39 (3): 607–29

  • Posthuma, Richard A, Michael C Campion, Malika Masimova & Micheal A Campion (2013), “A High Performance Work Practices Taxonomy: Integrating the Literature and Directing Future”, Journal of Management, 39 (5): 1184-1220

  • Premlatha, P. (2016), “Role of Manager-Employee Relationships in Retaining Knowledge Workers in IT Industry”, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 51 (3): 418-31.

  • Qiu, Min, Bei Hu, Xu Zhang, & Yucai Li (2015), “Emplyees Psychological Ownership and Self Efficacy as Mediators between Performance Appraisal Purpose and Pro-active Behavior” Social Behavior and Personality, 43 (7): 1101–10.

  • Reyt, Jean-Nicholas, and Batia M Wiesenfeld. (2015), “Seeing the Forest for the Trees: Exploratory Learning, Mobile Technology, and Knowledge Workers Role Integration Behaviours.” Academy of Management Journal, 58 (3): 739-762.

  • Ruggles, Rudy (1998), “The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management in Practice.” California Management Review, 40 (3): 80-89.

  • Sharma, Neha Paliwal, Tanuja Sharma & Madhushree Nanda Agarwal (2016), “Measuring Employee Perception of Performance Management System Effectiveness: Conceptualization and Scale Development”, Employee Relations, 38 (2): 224-47.

  • Stivers, Bonnie &Teresa Joyce (2000), “Building a Balanced Performance Management System”, S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 65 (2): 22-29.

  • Sumelius, Jennie, Ingmar Bjorkman, Mats Ehrnischolar_mainh, Kristiina Makela & Adam Smale (2014), “What Determines Employee Perceptions of HRM Process Features? The Case of Performance Appraisal in MNC Subsidiaries”, Human Resource Management, 53 (4): 569–92.

  • Sutherland, M, G Naidu, S Seabela, S Crosson & E Nyembe (2015), “The Components of Career Capital and How They Are Acquired by Knowledge Workers across Different Industries” South African Journal of Business Management, 46 (4): 1-10

  • Sveiby, Karl-Erik (2001), “Reproduced with Permission of the Copyright Owner. Further Reproduction Prohibited without Permission”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 2 (4): 344-58.

  • Taticchi, Paolo, Flavio Tonelli & Luca Cagnazzo (2010), “Performance Measurement and Management: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda”, Measuring Business Excellence, 14 (1): 4-18.

  • Taylor, W A & G H Wright (2004), “Organizational Readiness for Successful Knowledge Sharing: Challenges for Public Sector Mangers”, Information Resources Management Journal, 17 (2): 22-37.

  • Vieira, Rui, Brendan O’Dwyer & Roman Schneider (2016), “Aligning Strategy and Performance Management Systems: The Case of the Wind-Farm Industry”, Organization & Environment, 30 (1): 3-26

  • West, Damian & Deborah Blackman (2015), “Performance Management in the Public Sector”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74 (1): 73–81

  • Wiig, karl M. (1997), “Knowledge Management Where Did It Come From and Where Will It Go?” Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 13 (1): 1-14.

  • Willem, Annick, & Mark Buelens (2007), “Knowledge Sharing in Public Sector Organizations: The Effect of Organizational Characteristics on Interdepartmental Knowledge Sharing.”, Journal of Public Administration Research, 17 (4): 581-606

  • Zaim, Halil, Omer Faruk Gurcan, Merve Tarim, Selim Zaim & Lutfihak Alpkan (2015), “Determining the Critical Factors of Tacit Knowledge in Service Industry in Turkey.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207: 759 – 67


Abstract Views: 218

PDF Views: 0




  • Process Framework for Development of Performance Management System

Abstract Views: 218  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Varun Elembilassery
Human Resource Management XLRI Xavier School of Management, C H Area, Jamshedpur 831035, India

Abstract


This paper proposes a new process framework to develop a performance management system aligned to the context of knowledge based teams. Synthesis of literature and conceptual integration is the approach adopted to develop the framework. Firstly, the unique characteristics and the resulting work requirements of knowledge based teams are discussed. Secondly, based on these requirements the most suitable theoretical model for knowledge based teams is identified from literature. Finally, based on the fundamentals of the theoretical model, a new conceptual framework is proposed. The attributes of commitment based human resource management are argued to be the most suited theoretical model for knowledge based teams.

References