Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employer Attractiveness:A Comparative Analysis of Professionals &MBA Students’ Perceptions


Affiliations
1 Institute of Management, Nirma University, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) 382481, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Today every company is competing for the acquisition and retention of best talent. The employer attractiveness plays an important role for the company to attract potential employees and retain the current employees. This study examines the difference between the potential and current employees’perceptions along with the difference between male and female perceptions.What are important attractiveness dimensions aimed by current and potential employees? The results show that there is a significant difference amongst the perceptions of two sets of potential and current employees and males and females also.The importance of the dimensions of attractiveness is also very different among current and potential employees. The current employees value recognition/appreciation from management; the potential employees give most importance to gaining career enhancing experience.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T. N. & Cable, D. M. (2001), “Are You Attracted? Do You Intend to Pursue? A Recruiting Policy-capturing Study”,Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2): 219-37.

  • Albinger, H. S. & Freeman, S. J. (2000), “Corporate Social Performance and Attractiveness as an Employer to Different Job Seeking Populations”,Journal of Business Ethics, 28(3): 243-53.

  • Alnýaçýk, E. &Alnýaçýk, Ü. (2012), “Identifying Dimensions of Attractiveness in Employer Branding: Effects of Age, Gender, and Current Employment Status”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58: 1336-43.

  • Ambler, T. & Barrow, S. (1996), “The Employer Brand”,Journal of Brand Management, 4(3): 185-206.

  • Arachchige, B. J., & Robertson, A. (2011). Business Student Perceptions of a Preferred Employer: A Study Identifying Determinants of Employer Branding. IUP Journal of Brand Management, 8(3): 25-46

  • Bergen, H. C. (2008), Employer Attractiveness: What Effect Does CSR Have, and How Can Organizations Become Attractive to Norwegian Business Students? (Master’s Thesis), The Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Retrieved from: http://www.bi.edu/PageFiles/139283/ .

  • Berthon, P., Ewing, M. & Hah, L. L. (2005), “Captivating Company: Dimensions of Attractiveness in Employer Branding”, International Journal of Advertising, 24(2): 15172.

  • Birdsall, N. & O’Connell, L. (1999), “Putting Education to Work in Egypt. Paper Presented at Growth Beyond Stabilization: Prospects for Egypt”, Retrieved from: http://www.cgdev.org/doc/expert pages/ Egypt Mar15.pdf

  • Boswell W.R, Moynihan M.V, Roehling M.V, & Cavanaugh M.A(2001), “Responsibilities in the ‘New Employment Relationship’: An Empirical Test of an Assumed Phenomenon”, Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(3):307–27.

  • Breaugh, J. A. (2017), “The Contribution of Job Analysis to Recruitment”, in Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Recruitment, Selection and Employee Retention, West Sussex, UK :12-17

  • Breaugh, J. A. & Starke, M. (2000), “Research on Employee Recruitment: So Many Studies, So Many Remaining Questions”, Journal of Management, 26(3): 405-34.

  • Bretz Jr, R. D., Ash, R. A. & Dreher, G. F. (1989), “Do People Make the Place? An Examination of the Attraction selection attrition Hypothesis”,Personnel Psychology, 42(3): 561-81.

  • Cable, D. M. & Judge, T. A. (1994), “Pay Preferences and Job Search Decisions: A Person Organization Fit Perspective”,Personnel Psychology, 47(2): 317-48.

  • Davey, J., Burtensha, W, E., FitZpatric K, M. &Haar, J. (2011), “Join the Navy or Not ? Employer Branding in the Navy and Student’s Attraction to a Navy Career”, International Journal of Business Research, 11(3): 10-25.

  • Franca, V. &Pahor, M. (2012), “The Strength of the Employer Brand: Influences and Implications for Recruiting”,Journal of Marketing & Management, 3(1): 78-122

  • Galal, A. (2002), The Paradox of Education and Unemployment in Egypt, Cairo: Egyptian Center for Economic Studies.

  • Gomes, D. R. & Neves, J. (2010), “Employer Branding Constrains Applicants? Job Seeking Behaviour?”Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 26(3): 223.

  • Hassan, M. &Sassanpour, C. (2008), “Labor Market Pressures in Egypt: Why Is the Unemployment Rate Stubbornly High?” Journal of Development and Economic Policies, 10(2): 79-115.

  • Heilmann, P., Saarenketo, S. &Liikkanen, K. (2013), “Employer Branding in Power Industry”,International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 7(2): 283-302.

  • Helm, S. (2013), “A Matter of Reputation and Pride: Associations between Perceived External Reputation, Pride in Membership, Job Satisfaction andTurnover Intentions”, British Journal of Management, 24 (4): 542–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00827.x

  • Kucherov, D. &Zavyalova, E. (2012), “HRD Practices and Talent Management in the Companies with the Employer Brand”, European Journal of Training and Development, 36(1): 86-104.

  • Lievens, F., Decaesteker, C., Coetsier, P. &Geirnaert, J. (2001), “Organizational Attractiveness for Prospective Applicants: A Person–organization-fit Perspective”, Applied Psychology, 50(1): 30-51.

  • Newburry, W., Gardberg, N. A. & Belkin, L. Y. (2006), “Organizational Attractiveness Is in the Eye of the Beholder: The Interaction of Demographic Characteristics with Foreignness”, Journal of International Business Studies, 37(5): 666-86.

  • Ng, E. S. & Burke, R. J. (2005), “Person–organizationfit and the War for Talent: Does Diversity Management Make a Difference?” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(7): 1195-1210.

  • Pingle, S. S.& Sharma, A. (2013), “External Employer Attractiveness: A Study of Management Students in India”,Journal of Contemporary Management Research, 7(1): 78-95

  • Ramaswamy, V. (2009), “Leading the Transformation to Co-creation of Values”, Strategy and Leadership, 37 (2):32-37

  • Roy, S. K. (2008), “Identifying the Dimensions of Attractiveness of an Employer Brand in the Indian Context”,South Asian Journal of Management, 15(4): 110-30

  • Shahzad, K., Gul, A. Khan, K. Zafar, R. (2011), “Relationship between Perceived Employer Branding and Intention to Apply: Evidence from Pakistan”,European Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3):462-67.

  • Sivertzen, A. M., Nilsen, E. R. &Olafsen, A. H. (2013), “Employer Branding: Employer Attractiveness and the Use of Social Media”,Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(7): 473-83.

  • Turban, D. B. & Keon, T. L. (1993), “Organizational Attractiveness: An Interactionist Perspective”,Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2): 184.

  • Vaijayanthi, P., Roy, R., Shreenivasan, K. A. &Srivathsan, J. (2011), “Employer Branding as an Antecedent to Organization Commitment: An Empirical Study”, International Journal of Global Business, 4(2): 91-106

  • Yaqub, B. & Khan, M. A. (2011), “The Role of Employer Branding and Talent Management for Organizational Attractiveness”,Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, 5(5): 57-65.


Abstract Views: 377

PDF Views: 0




  • Employer Attractiveness:A Comparative Analysis of Professionals &MBA Students’ Perceptions

Abstract Views: 377  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sameer Sudhakar Pingle
Institute of Management, Nirma University, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) 382481, India
Rajwinder Kaur
Institute of Management, Nirma University, Ahmedabad (Gujarat) 382481, India

Abstract


Today every company is competing for the acquisition and retention of best talent. The employer attractiveness plays an important role for the company to attract potential employees and retain the current employees. This study examines the difference between the potential and current employees’perceptions along with the difference between male and female perceptions.What are important attractiveness dimensions aimed by current and potential employees? The results show that there is a significant difference amongst the perceptions of two sets of potential and current employees and males and females also.The importance of the dimensions of attractiveness is also very different among current and potential employees. The current employees value recognition/appreciation from management; the potential employees give most importance to gaining career enhancing experience.

References