Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

SCORE Model: A Hybrid Approach towards Performance Appraisal of Blue Collar Employees


Affiliations
1 XIMB, School of HR, Xavier University, Bhubaneswar, India
2 XLRI Jamshedpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Performance appraisal is one of the most crucial processes in human resource management. There are several methods for the appraisal of employees’ performance. There is always the scope for upgrading existing performance appraisals. With time, the cost of employees is likely to increase. So, the organizations need to justify that cost at some point of time in order to sustain their businesses. This paper proposes a hybrid approach for a new type of performance appraisal i.e., Specific, Continuous, Objective, Reliable and more Engaging (SCORE model). A performance appraisal problem is discussed and employees are graded as per the modified approach. This comparison concludes that this hybrid approach is more flexible and satisfactory compared to traditional methods.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Austin, Manila S. & Harkins, Debra A. (2008), “Assessing Change: Can Organizational Learning “Work” for Schools?” Journal of the Learning Organization, 15 (2): 105-25.

  • Beach S. Dale (1980), Personnel: The Management of People at Work, Macmillan Publishing Company.

  • Blackmore, Jacqueline A. (2005), “A Critical Evaluation of Peer Review via Teaching Observation within Higher Education”, International Journal of Educational Management. 19 (3): 218-32.

  • Decenzo, D. A. & Robbins, Stephen P. (2002), Human Resource Management, John Wiley and Sons, 7th edition, USA

  • Ford, D. K. (2004), “Development of a Performance Appraisal Training Program for the Rehabilitation”, Institute of Chicago. Journal of European Industrial Training, 28 (7): 550-63.

  • Freeman, J. (2002), How to Improve the Effectiveness of Performance Management and Appraisal by Overcoming the Root Cause of the Problem, The HRM Guide Network, Article available from: www.hrmguide.com/ performance

  • Fisher, C. D., Schoenfeldt, C. F. & Shaw, J. B. (1997), Performance Appraisal. Human Resource Management, 3rd edn, Houghton Mifflin Publishing, Boston.

  • Goffin, Richard D. (1996), “Criterion Validation of two Approaches to Performance Appraisal: The Behavioral Observation Scale and the Relative Percentile Method”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 11(1): 23– 33.

  • Golec A., Kahya E. (2007), “A Fuzzy Model for Competency-Based Employee Evaluation and Selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering”, 52 (1): 143–61.

  • Grifell-Tatje, E. & Marques-Gou, P. (2008), “Internal Performance Evaluation: the Case of Bank Branches”, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 19 (3): 30224.

  • Gungor Z., Serhadlioglu G., Kesen S.E. (2009), “A Fuzzy AHP Approach to Personnel Selection Problem”, Applied Soft Computing, 9 (2): 641–46.

  • Harris, M. M. (1994), “Rater Motivation in the Performance Appraisal Context: A Theoretical Framework”, Journal of Management, 20 (4): 737

  • Heath, T. J., Mills J. N. (2000), “Criteria Used by Employers to Select New Graduate Employees”, Veterinary Journal, Clinical Section, 78: 312-16.

  • Heneman, R. L. (1986), “The Relationship between Supervisory Ratings and Resultsoriented Measures of Performance: A Metaanalysis”, Personnel Psychology, 39 (4): 811–26

  • Heyel, Carl (1973), Encyclopedia of Management, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, USA

  • Jackson, Susan & Schuler, Randall (2005). A QuarterCentury Review of Human Resource Management in the US: The Growth in Importance of the International Perspective. Management Review, 16 (1): 1 -25.

  • Jelley, R. B. & Goffin, R. D (2001), “Can Performancefeedback Accuracy Be Improved? Effects of Rater Priming and Rating-scale Format on Rating Accuracy”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1): 134–44.

  • Jereb E., Rajkovic U., Rajkovic V (2005), “A Hierarchical Multi-Attribute System Approach to Personnel Selection”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3): 198 – 205.

  • Khoury, Grace C. & Analoui, Farhad (2004), “Innovative Management Model for Performance Appraisal: The Case of the Palestinian Public Universities”, Journal of Management Research News, 27 (1/2): 56 -73.

  • Long, P (1986), Performance Appraisal Revised. London: Institute of Personnel Management Martey, A.K (2002), “Appraising the Performance of Library Staff in a Ghanaian Academic Library”, Journal of Library Management, 23 (8): 403- 16.

  • McAdam, Rodney, Hazlett, Shirley-Ann & Casey, Ch (2005), “Performance Management in the UK Public Sector”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18 (3): 256- 73.

  • Olli, Laesvirta &Vincent M. Ribiere (2008), “KM in a Fast growing Global IT Company: A Case Study”, The Journal of Knowledge and Information Management Systems, 38 (2): 254-66.

  • Pettijohn, C. E., Pettijohn, L. S. & d’Amico, M (2001), Characteristics of performance appraisals and their impact on sales force satisfaction. Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol 12(2), pp. 127–146

  • Pettijohn, C., Pettijohn, L. S., Taylor, A. J. & Keillor, B. D (2001), “Are Performance Appraisals a Bureaucratic Exercise Or Can They Be Used To Enhance Sales-force Satisfaction and Commitment?” Journal of Psychology & Marketing, 18 (4): 337–64.

  • Propper, Carol & Wilson, Deborah. (2003), “The Use and Usefulness of Performance Measures in the Public Sector”, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, CMPO Working Paper Series No. 03/073. Centre for Market & Public Organizations, University of Bristol, Bristol.

  • Randell, G (1994), “Employee Appraisal, in Sisson, K. (Ed.), Personnel Management: A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice in Britain, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

  • Roberts, G. E (2003), “Employee Performance Appraisal System Participation: A Technique that Works”, Journal of Public Personnel Management, 32(1): 89

  • Roberts, G. E. & Reed, T. (1996), “Performance Appraisal Participation, Goal Setting and Feedback”, Review of Public Personnel Administration, 16(4): 29

  • Roch, S. G., Stemburgh, A. M. & Caputo, P. M (2007), “Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for Fairness and Organizational Justice”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15 (3): 302–16

  • Said, A. A., Hassab Elnaby, H. R. & Wier, B (2003), “An Empirical Investigation of The Performance Consequences of Nonfinancial Measures”, Journal of Management Accounting Research,15 (Issue No): 193-223.

  • Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A (2015), Research Methods for Business Students (5th edn). England: Pearson Education.

  • Saaty, T.L (2008), “Decision- making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Journal of Services Sciences, 1 (1): 83-98.

  • Seddon, J (2001), “Performance a Miracle: Praise the Workers”, The Observer, 11 March

  • Shah, J. B., & Murphy, J (1995), “Performance Appraisals for Improved Productivity”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 11(2): 26.

  • Shih, Hsi-An, Chiang, Yun-Hwa & Kim (2005), “Expatriate Performance Management from MNEs of Different National Origins”, International Journal of Manpower, 26 (2): 157-76.

  • Simmons, John & Lovegrove, Ian (2005), “Bridging the Conceptual Divide: Lessons from Stakeholder Analysis”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (5): 495-513.

  • Verbeeten, Frank H.M (2008), “Performance Management Practices in Public Sector Organizations”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3): 427-54.

  • Wilson, J.P. & Western, S (2000), “Performance Appraisal: An Obstacle to Training and Development”, Journal of European Industrial Training, 24 (7): 384-91.

  • Wagner, S. H. & Goffin, R. D. (1997), “Differences in Accuracy of Absolute and Comparative Performance Appraisal Methods”, Organizational Behavior and human Decision Processes, 70 (2): 95–103.

  • Yin, R. K. (2003), Case Study Research: Design & Method (3rd edn), London: Sage Publication.


Abstract Views: 168

PDF Views: 0




  • SCORE Model: A Hybrid Approach towards Performance Appraisal of Blue Collar Employees

Abstract Views: 168  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Arup Roy Chowdhury
XIMB, School of HR, Xavier University, Bhubaneswar, India
Sayed Obeidullah Abrar
XIMB, School of HR, Xavier University, Bhubaneswar, India
M G Jomon
XLRI Jamshedpur, India
Duttatreya Mishra
XIMB, School of HR, Xavier University, Bhubaneswar, India

Abstract


Performance appraisal is one of the most crucial processes in human resource management. There are several methods for the appraisal of employees’ performance. There is always the scope for upgrading existing performance appraisals. With time, the cost of employees is likely to increase. So, the organizations need to justify that cost at some point of time in order to sustain their businesses. This paper proposes a hybrid approach for a new type of performance appraisal i.e., Specific, Continuous, Objective, Reliable and more Engaging (SCORE model). A performance appraisal problem is discussed and employees are graded as per the modified approach. This comparison concludes that this hybrid approach is more flexible and satisfactory compared to traditional methods.

References