Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Leader-Member Exchange & Perceived Organizational Justice - An Empirical Investigation
Subscribe/Renew Journal
This study explored the relationship between the dimensions of two social exchange mechanisms of quality of leader-member exchange (LMX) and perceived organizational justice. Comprehensive multi-dimensional measures of organizational justice perception and quality of leader-member exchange relationship were used for the study. In line with recent and more elaborate measures of organizational justice, the LMX was also operationalized as dyadic and general environment of quality of leader-member exchange. The study was a web based survey of 266 Indian working executives from diverse set of industries. The generalizability of comprehensive measures of multi-dimensional LMX and organizational justice was supported in the Indian context.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Adams, J. S. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange”, in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2: 267-99. New York: Academic Press.
- Aggarwal-Gupta, M. & Kumar, R. (2010), “Look Who’s Talking! Impact of Communication Relationship Satisfaction on Justice Perceptions, Vikalpa, 35(3): 55-65.
- Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S. & Chen, Z. X. (2002), “Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model”, Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23: 267-85.
- Bentler, P. M. (1990), “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models”, Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238-46
- Bhal, K. T. (2005), LMX-Citizenship Behaviour Relationship: Justice as a Mediator”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 27(2): 106-17.
- Bhal, K. T. & Ansari, M. A. (1996), “Measuring Quality of Interaction between Leaders and Members”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26: 945-72
- Bhal, K. T. & Gulati, N. (2006), “Predicting Turnover Intentions: Incorporating the Role of Organization and Work-Group Level Variables”, Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 7(3&4): 41-50.
- Bhal, K. T. & Gulati, N. (2007), “Pay Satisfaction of Software Professionals in India”, Vikalpa, 32(3): 9-21.
- Bhal, K. T., Gulati, N. & Ansari, M. A. (2008), “Leader-Member Exchange and Subordinate Outcomes: Test of a Mediation Model”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(2): 106-25.
- Bies, R. J. & Moag, J. S. (1986), “Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness”, in R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on Negotiation in Organizations, (Volume 1: 43- 55), Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Bies, R. J., Shapiro, D. L. & Cummings, L. L. (1988), “Causal Accounts and Managing Organizational Conflict: Is It Enough to Say it’s Not My Fault?” Communication Research, 15(4): 381-99.
- Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993), “Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit”, in K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models: 136-62, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Colquitt, J. A. (2001), “On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 386-400.
- Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C. A. & Chen, P. Y. (2002), “Using Social Exchange Theory to Distinguish Procedural from Interactional Justice”, Group & Organizational Management, 27: 324-51.
- Deutsch, M. (1975), “Equity, Equality, and Need: What determines which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?” Journal of Social Issues, 31: 137-50.
- Dienesch, R. M. & Liden, R. C. (1986), “Leader- Member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development”, Academy of Management Review, 11: 618-34.
- Erdogan, B. (2002), “Antecedents and Consequences of Justice Perceptions in Performance Appraisals”, Human Resource Management Review, 12: 555-78
- Fairhurst, G. T. & Chandler, T. A. (1989), “Social Structure in Leader-Member Interaction”, Communication Monographs, 56: 215-39
- Gerstner, C.R. & Day, D.V. (1997), “Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6): 827-44.
- Graen, G. B. & Scandura, T. A. (1987), “Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing”, in L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour, (Vol. 9: 175–208), The Netherlands: JAI Press.
- Greenberg, J. (1990), “Employee Theft as a Reaction to Underpayment Inequity: The Hidden Cost of Pay Cuts”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 561-68.
- Greenberg, J. (1993), “The Social Side of Fairness: Interpersonal and Informational Classes of Organizational Justice”, in R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management: 79-103, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Greenberg, J. (1994), “Using Socially Fair Treatment to Promote Acceptance of a Work Site Smoking Ban”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 288-97
- Homans, G. C. (1961), Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms, New York: Harcourt Brace.
- Konovsky, M. A. & Cropanzano, R. (1991), “Perceived Fairness of Employee Drug Testing as a Predictor of Employee Attitudes and Job Performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76: 698-707.
- Leventhal, G. C. (1976), “The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations”, in L. Berkowitz & W. Walster (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academic Press.
- Leventhal, G. S. (1980), “What Should be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships”, in K. Gergen, M. Greenberg & R. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research: 27-55. New York: Plenu.
- Leventhal, G. S. Karuza, J. & Fry, W. R. (1980), “Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences”, in G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and Social Interaction : 167-218. New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Liden, R. C. & Maslyn, J. M. (1998), “Multidimensionality of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development”, Journal of Management, 24: 43-72.
- Mansour-Cole, D. M. & Scott, S. G. (1998), “Hearing it through the Grapevine: The Influence of Source, Leader Relations and Legitimacy on Survivors’ Fairness Perceptions”, Personnel Psychology, 51: 25-54.
- Moye, N. A., Masterson, S. S. & Bartol, K. M. (1997), “Differentiating Antecedents and Consequences of Procedural and Interactional Justice: Empirical Evidence in Support of Separate Constructs”, Paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Management, Boston, MA
- Robbins, T. L., Summers, T. P. & Miller, J. L. (2000), Using the Group-Value Model to Explain the Role of Non-instrumental Justice in Distinguishing the Effects of Distributive and Procedural Justice”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73: 511-18.
- Scandura, T. A., Graen, G. B. & Novak, M. A. (1986), “When Managers Decide Not to Decide Autocratically: An Investigation of Leader-Member Exchange and Decision Influence”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 579-84.
- Shapiro, D. L., Buttner, E. H. & Barry, B. (1994), “Explanations: What Factors Enhance Their Perceived Adequacy?” Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 58: 346-68.
- Sweeney, P. D. & McFarlin, D. B. (1993), “Workers’ Evaluations of the ‘‘Ends’’ and the ‘‘Means’’: An Examination of Four Models of Distributive and Procedural Justice”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55: 23-40.
- Thibaut, J. & Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
- Tucker, L. R. & Lewis, C. A. (1973), “A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis”, Psychometrika, 38: 1-10
- van Dyne, L., Kamdar, D. & Joireman, J. (2008), “In-Role Perceptions Buffer the Negative Impact of Low LMX on Helping and Enhance the Positive Impact of High LMX on Voice”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6): 1195-1207.
- Varma, A., Srinivas, E. S. & Stroh, L. K. (2005), “A Comparative Study of the Impact of Leader-Member Exchange in US and Indian Samples”, Cross Cultural Management, 12(1): 84-95.
Abstract Views: 274
PDF Views: 0