Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Organizational Strategy on Universalistic or Contingent HR Practices in Indian Manufacturing


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study seeks to understand the impact that the firm level strategies have on the kind of human resource practices adopted. Several similar studies have been conducted in the Western countries; the paper covers this literature extensively. A set of fifteen HR best practices were studied across various industries such as automobiles, oil&gas, infrastructure, power, chemicals, metals and mining etc in the Indian context. Also, the paper attempts to gauge whether the practices adopted in various organizations are universal to the industry or contingent to their respective corporate strategy - categorized as cost reduction, quality focus and flexible systems.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Arthur, J. B. (1992), “The Link between Business Strategy and Industrial Relations Systems in American Steel Minimills”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45: 488- 506.
  • Cappelli, P. & Singh, H. (1992), “Integrating Strategic Human Resources and Strategic management”, in D. Lewin, O. S. Mitchell & P D. Sherer (Eds.), Research Frontiers in Industrial Relations and Human Resources: 165-192. Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association.
  • Davies, A.J. & Kochhar, A.K. (2002), “Manufacturing Best Practice and Performance Studies: a Critique”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(3):289-305.
  • Delery, J.E. & Doty, D.H. (1996), “Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions”, Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802-35.
  • Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G. & Flynn, E.J. (1999), “World Class Manufacturing: an Investigation of Hayes and Wheelwright’s Foundation”, Journal of Operations Management, 17: 249-69.
  • Greswell, T., Childe, S. & Mull, R. (1998), “Three Manufacturing Strategy Archetypes – a Framework for the Aerospace Industry”, in Bititci, U. & Carrie, A. (Eds), Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Value Chain, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 53-61.
  • Hayes, R.H. & Wheelwright, S.C. (1984), Restoring Our Competitive Edge: Competing through Manufacturing, John Wiley, New York, NY.
  • Kathuria, R. & Partovi, F.Y. (1999), “Workforce Management Practices for Manufacturing Flexibility”, Journal of Operations Management, 18: 21-39.
  • Katz, Harry, Thomas A. Kochan, & Kenneth Gobeille (1983), “Industrial Relations Performance, Economic Performance, & QWL Programs: An Interplant Analysis.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 37, (1) (October): 3-17.
  • Katz, Harry, Thomas A. Kochan &Jeffrey Keefe. (1988), “Industrial Relations and Productivity in the U.S. Automobile Industry”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 685-715.
  • Katz, Harry, Thomas A. Kochan & Mark Weber (1985), “Assessing the Effects of Industrial Relations and Quality of Working Life on Organizational Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 28 (3) (September): 509-27.
  • Kleiner, M. M., Block, R. N., Roomkin, M. & Salsburg, S. W. (1987), Human Resources and the Performance of the Firm. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
  • Kogut, Bruce & Udo Zander (1992), “Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabili ties, and the Repli- cation of Technology”, Organization Science, 3 (3) (August): 383- 97.
  • Laugen, B., Acur, N., Boer, H., Frick, J. (2005), “Best Manufacturing Practices: What do the Best-performing Companies Do?” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25 (2):131 – 50
  • MacDuffie, John Paul (1991), “Beyond Mass Production: Flexible Production Systems and Manufacturing Performance in the World Auto Industry” Diss., Sloan School of Management, M.I.T.
  • MacDuffie, J. P. (1995), “Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48: 197-221.
  • Miles, R., & Snow, C. C. (1984), “Designing Strategic Human Resource Systems”, Organizational Dynamics, 13(1): 36-52.
  • Osterman, P. (1994), “How Common Is Workplace Transformation and Who Adopts It?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47: 173-88.
  • Osterman, Paul. (1987), “Choices among Alternative Internal Labor Market Systems” Industrial Relations, 27 (1) (February): 46- 67.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1977), “The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Control”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22: 95-113
  • Pfeffer, J. (1994), Competitive Advantage through People. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Prahalad, C. K. (1983), “Developing Strategic Capability: An Agenda for Top Management”, Human Resource Management, 22: 237-54.
  • Snell, S. A. (1992), “Control Theory in Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect of Administrative Information”, Academy of Management Journal, 35: 292-327.
  • Snell, S. A. & Dean, J. W., Jr. (1992), “Integrated Manufacturing and Human Resource Management: A Human Capital Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, 35: 467- 504.
  • Snell, S. A., & Dean, J. W. Jr. (1994), “Strategic Compensation for Integrated Manufacturing: The Moderating Effects of Job and Organizational Inertia”, Academy of Management Journal, 37: 1109-40.
  • Snell, S. A. & Youndt, M. (1995), “Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: Testing a Contingency Model of Executive Controls”, Journal of Management, 21: 711-37.
  • Truss, C. & Gratton, L. (1994), “Strategic Human Resource Management: a Conceptual Approach”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(3), September Voss, C.A. (1995a), “Alternative Paradigms for Manufacturing Strategy”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15 (4): 5-16.
  • Voss, C.A. (1995b), Manufacturing Strategy: Process and Content, Chapman & Hall, London. Wright, P. M. & McMahan, G. C. (1992), “Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management”, Journal of Management, 18: 295-320.
  • Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C. & McWilliams, A. (1994), “Human Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource- based Perspective”, International Journal of Human Resources Management, 5: 301-26.
  • Youndt, Snell, Dean& Lepak Ouchi, W. G. (1978), “The Transmission of Control through Organizational Hierarchy”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21: 173-92.

Abstract Views: 274

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Organizational Strategy on Universalistic or Contingent HR Practices in Indian Manufacturing

Abstract Views: 274  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Avantika Tomar
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, India

Abstract


This study seeks to understand the impact that the firm level strategies have on the kind of human resource practices adopted. Several similar studies have been conducted in the Western countries; the paper covers this literature extensively. A set of fifteen HR best practices were studied across various industries such as automobiles, oil&gas, infrastructure, power, chemicals, metals and mining etc in the Indian context. Also, the paper attempts to gauge whether the practices adopted in various organizations are universal to the industry or contingent to their respective corporate strategy - categorized as cost reduction, quality focus and flexible systems.

References