Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Innovation Promotion Competencies of Indian Managers: An Empirical Study


Affiliations
1 Business Management (Faculty of Management Studies), Vikram University, Ujjain (M.P.), India
2 Business Management, Shri Vaishnav Institute of Management, Indore (M.P.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study revealed that innovation promotion competencies (IPCs) exist among Indian managers at high or moderate levels. High or moderate degree of positive correlation was found to exist among the various creative abilities (CAs), among the various innovation promotion competencies (IPCs), and also among the various CAs and IPCs. Creative abilities have positive impacts on the IPCs. Social and work environment factors in the organizations have also been found favourable to innovation promotion competencies. Social and work environment factors have positive impacts on the innovation promotion competencies in the organizations. The effectiveness of innovation adoption and diffusion is not only a function of "perceived innovation promotion competencies" but also of effective application of such competencies in practice.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Augsdorfor, P. (1994), “The Manager as Pirate: An Inspection of the Gentle Art of Boot Legging”, Creativity and Innovation Management, 3 (2): 91-95.

  • Beath, C.M. (1991), “Supporting the Innovation Champion”, MIS Quarterly, I5 (3): 355-72.

  • Beatty, C.A. & Gordon, J. (1991), “Preaching the Gospel; The Evangelist of New Technology”, California Management Review, 33(3): 73-74.

  • Burgelman, R.A. (1983), “Managing the Internal Corporate Venturing Process”, Sloan Management Review, 25 (2): 33-48.

  • Chakrabarty, A.K. (1974), “The Division of Labour in Innovation Management”, R and D Management, 19 (2): 161-71.

  • Daft, R.L. (1986), “A Dual-core Model of Organizational Innovation”, Academy of Management Journal, 21 (2): 193-210.

  • Dean, J.W. (1987), “Building the Future: The Justification Process for New Technology”, in J. Pennings and A. Buitendam (eds.), New Technology as Organizational Innovation: The Development and Diffusion of Microelectronics, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publication.

  • Dwivedi, R.S. (2005a), “Innovation – Sponsoring Capability Among Executives”, Delhi Business Review, 6(1): 11-25.

  • Dwivedi, R.S. (2005b), “Evaluating Managers’ Innovation Sponsoring Capability for Sustained Growth and Profit: An Empirical Study in Two Contrasting Organizations”, The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3): 313-38.

  • Ekvall, G. (1988), Fornyelse och Fiktion, Om Organization, Kreativitet Og Innovation, Boras: Centraltryckeriet AB.

  • Ekvall, G. (1996), “Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1): 105-23.

  • Farr, James L.& Ford, Cameron M. (1990), “Individual Innovation”, in Michael A. West and James L. Farr, Innovation and Creativity at Work : Psychological and Organizational Strategies, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

  • Granovetter, M. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties”, American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6):1360-80.

  • Harvard Business School (2002), “Inspiring Innovation”, Harvard Business Review, 80(8), August, 39-49 (Reprint No. R0208B).

  • Holbek, J. (1990), “Lokale Innovasjonstiltak : Padrivors Plass Som Ildsjel Og Integrators”, in H. Boldersheim (ed), Ledelse, Og Innovation – I Kommunene, Oslo:Tano.

  • Howell, J.M. & Higgins, C.A. (1990a), “Champions of Technological Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2):317-41.

  • Howell, J.M. & Higgins, C.A. (1990b), “Champions of Change: Identifying, Understanding and Supporting Champions of Technological Innovations”, Organizational Dynamics, 19(1), Summer: 40-57.

  • Howell, J.M. & Shea, C.M. (2001), “Individual Differences, Environmental Scanning, Innovation Framing and Champion Behaviour: Key Predictors of Project Performance”, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18 (1):15-27.

  • Jain, Ravindra (2010), “Innovation in Organizations: A Comprehensive Conceptual Framework for Future Research”, South Asian Journal in Management, 17 (2): 81 – 111.

  • Jain, Ravindra & Juneja, Vibhooti (2010), “Role Innovation Attitude and Role Efficacy of Managerial Personnel in Selected Public Enterprises”, The Indian Journal of Commerce, 63(4): 50-62.

  • Jain, Ravindra & Juneja, Vibhooti (2011), “Role Innovation Behaviour of Managerial Personnel of Banking and Insurance Enterprises”, South Asian Journal of Management. 18(3):69 - 99.

  • Jenssen, J.P. & Havnes, P.A. (2002), “Public Intervention in the Entrepreneurial Process: A Study Based on Three Norwegian Cases”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 8:173-88.

  • Jenssen, Jan Inge & Jorgensen, Geir (2005), “How Do Corporate Champions Promote Innovations?” International Journal of Innovation Management, 9 (1):63-86.

  • Kanter, R. M. (1983), The Change Masters Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work, London: Allen & Unwin.

  • Khandwalla, P. N. & Mehta K. (2004), ‘Designing of Corporate Creativity’, Vikalpa, 29(1):13-28.

  • Khandwalla, Pradeep N. (1985), “Pioneering Innovative Management: An Indian Excellence,” Organization Studies, 6 (2):161-83.

  • Khandwalla, Pradip N. (1995), Management Styles, New Delhi, Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd.

  • Khandwalla, Pradip N. (2003), Corporate Creativity: The Winning Edge, New Delhi: Tata McGraw Hill Education Pvt. Ltd.

  • Khandwalla. Pradip N. (1988), Fourth Eye: Excellence Through Creativity, Allahabad: A.H. Wheeler Publishing.

  • Kiernan, M.J. (1996), “Get Innovative or Get Dead”, Business Quarterly,6 (1):51-58.

  • Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M. & Wilkinson, I. (1980), “Intra-organizational Influence Tactics: Exploration in Getting One’s Way”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65 (4): 440-52.

  • Krackhardt, D. (1992), “The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations”, in Nohria, N.& R.G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations : Structure Form and Actions, 216-39, Massachusetts: Harward Business School.

  • Krackhardt, D. (1995), “Entrepreneurship Opportunities in an Entrepreneurial Firm: A Structural Approach”, Entrepreneurship : Theory and Practice, 19 (3): 53-69.

  • Lawson, Benn & Samson, Danny (2001), “Developing Innovation Capability in Organizations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach”, International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(3):377-400.

  • Martins, E. & Martins, N., (2002), “An Organizational Culture Model to Promote Creativity and Innovation”, SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28 (4): 58-65.

  • Meyerson, D.E. (2001), “Radical Change: The Quiet Way”, Harvard Business Review, 79(9): 92-100.

  • Pearson, A.E. (1988), “Tough-minded ways to get Innovative”, Harvard Business Review, 66(3): 99-106.

  • Rothwell, R.E.A. (1974), “SAPPHO (Updated) Project Phase II,” Research Policy, 3 (3):258-91.

  • Williams L.K.& Stephen M. J. (2010), “Economic Creativity and Innovation Implementation:the Entrepreneurial Drivers of Growth? Evidence from 63 Countries”, Small Business Economics, 34(4): 391–412.


Abstract Views: 220

PDF Views: 0




  • Innovation Promotion Competencies of Indian Managers: An Empirical Study

Abstract Views: 220  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ravindra Jain
Business Management (Faculty of Management Studies), Vikram University, Ujjain (M.P.), India
Pragya Sharma
Business Management, Shri Vaishnav Institute of Management, Indore (M.P.), India

Abstract


This study revealed that innovation promotion competencies (IPCs) exist among Indian managers at high or moderate levels. High or moderate degree of positive correlation was found to exist among the various creative abilities (CAs), among the various innovation promotion competencies (IPCs), and also among the various CAs and IPCs. Creative abilities have positive impacts on the IPCs. Social and work environment factors in the organizations have also been found favourable to innovation promotion competencies. Social and work environment factors have positive impacts on the innovation promotion competencies in the organizations. The effectiveness of innovation adoption and diffusion is not only a function of "perceived innovation promotion competencies" but also of effective application of such competencies in practice.

References