Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Trade Unions in Malaysia:Perspectives of Employers & Employees of Unionized Companies


Affiliations
1 Faculty of Economics & Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
2 Sunway University College, Malaysia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper examines the views of employees and employers from unionised companies on trade unions in Peninsular Malaysia. A majority of nonunion members perceived that employers do not display a positive attitude towards the unions at workplace. The role of the individual rather than the collective aspirations of employees is clearly emphasised by employers. The high level of employers' opposition to unionisation is clearly an indicator of its role in the erosion of collective representation, leading to the diminution of union organising efforts. The highly competitive and dynamic globalized business environment has been the key driver in employers' attitudes towards trade unions. Trade unions need to review their organising strategies, as well as their internal procedures and processes. Trade unions should go beyond their traditional roles and engage in activities strategic to their communities and employers.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aminuddin , M. (2003), Malaysian Industrial Relations and Employment Law, 4th edn., McGraw-Hill, Malaysia.

  • Aminuddin, M. (2008), Human Resource Management: Principles and Practices, Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur.

  • Anantaraman, A. (1997), Malaysian Industrial Relations: Law & Practice, Universiti Putra Malaysia Press, Serdang, Malaysia.

  • Arudsothy, P. (1988), “Labor Law and Industrial Relations in Malaysia”, Labour and Industry, 1(3).

  • Benson, J. & Zhu, Y. (2008), ‘Trade Unions in Asia: Organization, Strategy and Issues’, in Benson, J.& Zhu, Y. (eds), Trade Unions in Asia: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, Oxon: Routledge.

  • Bhopal, M. (2001), “Malaysian Unions in Political Crisis: Assessing the Impact of the Asian

  • Contagion”, Asia Pacific Business Review, 8 (2):73-100.

  • Bramble, T. (2001), “A Potrait of Australia Trade Union Officials”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39 (4):529-37.

  • Bryson, A. (2003), “Working with Dinosaurs? Union Effectiveness in Delivering for Employees”, PSA Research Discussion Paper 11, London: Policy Studies Institute.

  • Department of Statistics (2006), Malaysia Economic Statistics-Time Series 2005, Malaysia.

  • Department of Trade Unions (2006), Statistical Summary of Labour and Human Resources, http://www.mohr.gov.my/mohr_key.php (accessed 30 June 2006).

  • Department of Trade Union Affairs (2003), Trade Unions by Sector, 2000 – Jan 2002 Ministry of Human Resources, Malaysia, http:/ /www.mtuc.org.my/statistics.html.

  • Gall, G. & McKay, S. (2001), “Facing ‘Fairness at Work’: Union Perception of Employer Opposition and Response to Union Recognition”, Industrial Relations Journal, 32 (2) :94-113.

  • Gilbert, R. (1993), “Workplace Industrial Relations 25 Years after Donovan: An Employer View”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31: 235-53.

  • Hyman, R. (1989), “Dualism and Division in labour Strategies”, in Hyman, R., The Political Economy of Industrial Relations, London: Macmillan.

  • Heery, E. (2002), “Partnership versus Organizing: Alternative Futures for British Trade Unionism”, Industrial Relations Journal, 33 (1): 20-35.

  • Jomo, K.S. & Todd, P. (1994), Trade Unions and the State in Peninsular Malaysia, Oxford University Press, Kuala Lumpur.

  • Jomo, K.S. (1995), “Capital, the State and Labour in Malaysia”, in Capital, the State and Labour, United Nations Press, Aldershot, UK:85-237.

  • Josey, A. (1958), Trade Unionism in Malaya, 2nd. Edn., Donald Moore, Singapore.

  • Kelly, J. (1996), “Union Militancy and Social Partnership”, in Ackers, P., Smith, C. & Smith, P. (eds), The New Workplace and Trade Unionism: Critical Perspectives on Work and Organization, Routledge, London.

  • Kuruvilla, S. (1995), “Industrialisation Strategy and Industrial Relations Policy in Malaysia” in Frenkel, S. & Harrod, J. (Eds.), Industrialisation and Labor Relations: Contemporary Research in Seven Countries, Ithaca: ILR Press: 36-66.

  • Kuruvilla, S. & Erickson, C.L. (2002), “Change and Transformation in Asian Industrial Relations”, Industrial Relations, 41(2).

  • Leap, T.L. (1995), Collective Bargaining and Labor Relations, 2nd. edn., Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

  • McGregor, A. & Sproull, A. (1992), “Employers and the Flexible Workforce’, Employment Gazette, May: 225-34.

  • Ministry of Human Resources (1991), Labour Indicators 1990, Kuala Lumpur. Office of Employment Advocate (2004), De facto Compulsory Unionisation – 1999 Report,

  • Report of the Australian Government. November. h t t p : / /www. o e a . g o v. a u printer.asp?showdoc=/home/researchunionism. asp &SubMenu=4

  • Parasuraman, B. (2004), Malaysian Industrial Relations: A Critical Analysis. Kuala Lumpur: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Poole, M., Mansfield, R., Gould-Williams, J. & Mendes, P. (2005), “British Managers’ Attitudes and Behaviour in Industrial Relations: A Twenty-year Study”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43 (1): 117-34.

  • Rajasekaran, G. (2002), “Impact of Globalization on Workers and Trade Unions”, MTUC/ LO Norway National Workshop on Globalization and its Impact on Workers in Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, 16-17 September.

  • Ramasamy, N. & Rowley, C. (2008), ‘Trade Unions in Malaysia: Complexity of a State- Employer System’, in Benson, J. & Zhu, Y. (eds), Trade Unions in Asia: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, London

  • Routledge. The Star, (2002) “Convince Firms on Need for Unions, MEF Told”, Nation, March 28.

  • Savant, P.B. (1990), Key-note Address by the Hon’ble Justice, Proceedings from LAWASIA Second International Seminar on Labour Law, New Delhi, 28-30 September, Vol. 1.

  • Tolich, P. & Harcourt, M. (1999), “Why Do People Join Unions? A Case Study of the New Zealand Engineering, Printing and Manufacturing Union”, Current Research in Industrial Relations, 2: 267-75.

  • Todd, P., Lansbury, R. & Davis, E. M. (2004), “Industrial Relations in Malaysia: Some Proposals for Reform”, Proceedings of the IIRA 5th Asian Regional Congress, Seoul, Korea Labour Institute

  • Todd, P. & Peetz, D. (2001), “Malaysian Industrial Relations at Century’s Turn: Vision 2020 or a Spectre of the Past?”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 12(8): 1365-82.

  • Waddington, J. &Whitston, C. (1993), “Research as Engagement: Trade Unions in the 1990s”, in Forrester, K. & Thorne, C. (eds.), Trade Unions and Social Research, Aveburt, England: 24-44.


Abstract Views: 539

PDF Views: 0




  • Trade Unions in Malaysia:Perspectives of Employers & Employees of Unionized Companies

Abstract Views: 539  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Raduan Che Rose
Faculty of Economics & Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Naresh Kumar
Faculty of Economics & Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
Nagiah Ramasamy
Sunway University College, Malaysia

Abstract


This paper examines the views of employees and employers from unionised companies on trade unions in Peninsular Malaysia. A majority of nonunion members perceived that employers do not display a positive attitude towards the unions at workplace. The role of the individual rather than the collective aspirations of employees is clearly emphasised by employers. The high level of employers' opposition to unionisation is clearly an indicator of its role in the erosion of collective representation, leading to the diminution of union organising efforts. The highly competitive and dynamic globalized business environment has been the key driver in employers' attitudes towards trade unions. Trade unions need to review their organising strategies, as well as their internal procedures and processes. Trade unions should go beyond their traditional roles and engage in activities strategic to their communities and employers.

References