Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Induction Age, Training Duration & Job Performance on Organizational Commitment & Job Satisfaction


Affiliations
1 Services Selection Board, Bhopal, India
2 Department of Psychology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study was carried out as part of a larger study in a public sector organization with an all India presence. The study explored the influence of induction age, training duration and job permanence of organizational commitment and job satisfaction among 220 participants from a large public sector organization who rated 18 items commitment scale developed by Meyer&Allen and 15 items self-developed job satisfaction scale. Results found that employees inducted at a younger age and trained by the organization for a longer duration are more committed to the organization normatively. Furthermore, permanent employees were found to be more committed normatively and also exhibited higher job satisfaction as compared to contract employees.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. (1996), “Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity”. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 49: 256-76

  • Bachman, J.G., Sigelman, L. & Diamond, G. (1987), “Self-Selection, Socialization, and Distinctive Military Values: Attitudes of High School Seniors”, Armed Forces & Society, 13(2): 169-88.

  • Becker, H.S. & Strauss, A.L. (1956), “Careers, Personality, and Adult Socialization”, American Journal of Sociology, 62(3): 253-63.

  • Caplow,T. (1964), Principles of Organization, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.

  • Faris, J.H. (1976), “Socialization into the All- Volunteer Force”. in Nancy L. Goldman and David R. Segal (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Military Service, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications

  • Fogarty, T.J. & Dirsmith, M. W. (2001), “Organizational Socialization as Instrument and Symbol: An Extended Institutional Theory Perspective”, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(3): 247-66.

  • Gecas, V. (1990), “Contexts of Socialization”, in Morris Rosenberg and Ralph H. Turner (Eds.), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers

  • Jones, G.R. (1983), “Psychological Orientation and the Process of Organizational Socialization: An Interactionist Perspective”, The Academy of Management Review, 8(3): 464-74.

  • Koch, J. & Steers, R. (1978), “Job Attachment, Satisfaction and Turnover among Public Sector Employees”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 12: 119-28

  • Kraimer, M.L. (1997), “Organizational Goals and Values: A Socialization Model”, Human Resources Management Review, 7(4): 425-47.

  • Lio, K. (1995), “Professional Orientation and Organizational Commitment among Public Employees: An Empirical Study of Detention Workers”, Journal of Public Administration, Research and Theory, 5: 231-46.

  • Locke, E. A. & Lathan, G. P. (1976), Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance, Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.

  • Luthans, F. (1998), Organisational Behaviour, Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill.

  • Meyer, J.P. & Allen, N.J. (1991), “A Three-component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment”, Human Resource Management Review, 1: 61-89.

  • Meyer, J.P& Allen, N.J. (1997), Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications

  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993), “Commitment to Organizations and Occupations: Extension and Test of a Three-component Conceptualization”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (4): 538-52.

  • Moser, K. (1997), “Commitment in Organizations”, Psychologies, 41 (4): 160-70.

  • Perry, J.L & Wise, L.R. (1990), “The Motivational Bases of Public Service”, Public Administration Review, 50 (3): 367-73.

  • Pfeffer, J. (1998), “Understanding Organizations: Concepts and Controversies”, in D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology, New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T. & Boulian, P. (1974), “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59:603-09.


Abstract Views: 277

PDF Views: 0




  • Induction Age, Training Duration & Job Performance on Organizational Commitment & Job Satisfaction

Abstract Views: 277  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

N. K. Natarajan
Services Selection Board, Bhopal, India
Dinesh Nagar
Department of Psychology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, India

Abstract


This study was carried out as part of a larger study in a public sector organization with an all India presence. The study explored the influence of induction age, training duration and job permanence of organizational commitment and job satisfaction among 220 participants from a large public sector organization who rated 18 items commitment scale developed by Meyer&Allen and 15 items self-developed job satisfaction scale. Results found that employees inducted at a younger age and trained by the organization for a longer duration are more committed to the organization normatively. Furthermore, permanent employees were found to be more committed normatively and also exhibited higher job satisfaction as compared to contract employees.

References