Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Towards Realist Constructivism: Implications for Teaching & Training


Affiliations
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna-800001, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Constructivism is a popular but often misconstrued worldview. This article strengthens the constructivist position by showing that it can withstand a knowable real world. Such a position helps to correct many widespread practices in the name of constructivist education such as equating hands-on experiences with active learning. Further, it spans constructivism over the entire training life cycle. It makes a strong case for constructivism as a way to have a world that knows to live with diversity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bagley, C. & Hunter, B. (1992), “Restructuring, Constructivism, and Technology: Forging a New Relationship”. Educational Technology, 32(7): 22-27.
  • Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  • Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993), In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms, Alexandria, CA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Bruner, J. (1966), Toward a Theory of Instruction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Campoy, R. (1992), “The Role of Technology in the School Reform Movement”, Educational Technology, 32(8): 17-22.
  • Clark, M. (2002), In Search of Human Nature, London: Routledge.
  • Collins, A. (1991), “The Role of Computer Technology in Restructuring Schools”. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1): 28-36.
  • Diettrich, O. (2001), “A Physical Approach to the Construction of Cognition and to Cognitive Evolution”. Foundation of Science, 6: 273–341.
  • Einstein, A. (2000), “Relativity: The Special and General Theory”. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.bartleby.com/173/.
  • Foerster, H. v. (1973), “On Constructing a Reality”. in F. E. Preiser (Ed.), Environmental Design Research, 2: 35-46. Stroudberg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.
  • Glasersfeld, E. V. (1995), Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning, London: The Falmer Press.
  • Hofstede, G (2001), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviours, Institutions, and Organisations across Nations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Gupta, V. & Associates (Eds.) (2004), Culture, Leadership, and Organisations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Kelly, G. (1963), A Theory of Personality, New York: Norton.
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2 ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • LeBaron, J. F., & Bragg, C. A. (1994), “Practicing What We Preach: Creating Distance Education Models to Prepare Teachers for the Twenty-first Century”, American Journal of Distance Education, 8: 5-19.
  • Llinás, R. R. (2001), I of the Vortex, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Mann, C. (1994), “New Technologies and Gifted Education”, Roeper Review, 16(3): 172-76.
  • Maturana, H. R, & Varela, F. J. (1979), Autopoiesis and Cognition, Boston: Reidel.
  • Mookerji, R. K. (1969), Ancient Indian Education, Delhi: Motilal Banarasi Das.
  • Piaget, J. (1954),The Construction of Reality in the Child, New York: Ballantine.
  • Plonsky, M. (1998), “Canine Vision” [Electronic Version]. Retrieved July 01, 2010 from http://www.uwsp.edu/psych/dog/LA/ DrP4.htm.
  • Popper, K. (1963), “Conjectures and Refutations”. London: Routledge.
  • Strommen, E. F. & Lincoln, B. (1992), “Constructivism, Technology, and the Future of Classroom Learning”. Education and Urban Society, 24(4): 466-76.

Abstract Views: 247

PDF Views: 0




  • Towards Realist Constructivism: Implications for Teaching & Training

Abstract Views: 247  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Alok Kumar
Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna-800001, India

Abstract


Constructivism is a popular but often misconstrued worldview. This article strengthens the constructivist position by showing that it can withstand a knowable real world. Such a position helps to correct many widespread practices in the name of constructivist education such as equating hands-on experiences with active learning. Further, it spans constructivism over the entire training life cycle. It makes a strong case for constructivism as a way to have a world that knows to live with diversity.

References