Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employee Attitudes Towards Employer-Sponsored Child Care: Evidence from France


Affiliations
1 University of Nantes, France, France
2 Audencia Nantes School of Management, France, France
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The increasing numbers of women in the labour market and the rise in dual-career couples have prompted many organizations to introduce programmes to help their employees balance their work and personal lives. Positive employee perceptions of such initiatives have tended to be assumed rather than demonstrated. This study examines how a proposal for a worklife balance programme is actually viewed by employees. Drawing on survey data from 300 employees in a shopping centre in France, the study finds evidence of a range of attitudes. These attitudes are influenced not only by existing and potential constraints, but also by the possibility of the employees benefiting from child care as well as their views concerning the role of the organization. Attitudes towards the provision of child care are particularly positive when they seek to attenuate difficulties of work organization and are consistent with a flexible approach that takes employees' personal constraints into account.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anderson, S., Coffey B. & Byerly, R. (2002), “Formal Organizational Initiatives and Informal Workplace Practices: Links to Work-Family Conflict and Job-Related Outcomes”, Journal of Management, 28(6): 787-810.

  • Baret, C., Gadrey, J. & Gallouj, C. (1999), “France, Germany, Great Britain: The Organization of Working Time in Large Retail Food Stores”, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 5(1): 27-48.

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. & Rodgers, W. (1976), The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations and Satisfaction. New York: Sage.

  • Crompton, R. & Lyonette, C. (2006), “Work-Life ‘Balance’ in Europe”, Acta Sociologica, 49(4): 379-93.

  • Davis, A. & Kalleberg, A. (2006), “Family- Friendly Organizations? Work and Family Programs in the 1990s”, Work and Occupations, 33(2): 191-223.

  • Den Dulk, L. & de Ruijter, J. (2008), “Managing Work-Life Policies: Disruption Versus Dependency Arguments. Explaining Managerial Attitudes Towards Employee Utilization of Work-Life Policies”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(7): 1222-36.

  • Duxbury, L. & Higgins, C. (2001), Work-Life Balance in the New Millennium: Where are We? Where Do we Need to Go? Survey financed by Health Canada.

  • Duxbury, L., Higgins, C. & Lee, C. (1994), “Work- Family Conflict: A Comparison by Gender, Family Type and Perceived Control”, Journal of Family Issues, 15: 449-66. Evans, P. & Bartolomé, F. (1980), “The Relationship Between Professional and Private Life”, in C. Derr (Ed.), Work, Family and Career (281-99), New York: Praeger.

  • Ezra, M. & Deckman, M. (1996), “Balancing Work and Family Responsibilities: Flextime and Child Care in the Federal Government”, Public Administration Review, 56(2): 174-79. Fagnani, J. & Letablier, M.-T. (2004), “Work and Family Life Balance: The Impact of the 35- Hour Laws in France”, Work, Employment and Society, 18(3): 551-72.

  • Frone, M., Russell, M. & Cooper, M. (1992), “Antecedents and Outcomes of Work-Family Conflict: Testing a Model of the Work- Family Interface”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1): 65-78.

  • Frone, M. & Yardley, J. (1996), “Workplace Family- Supportive Programmes: Predictors of Employed Parents’ Importance Ratings”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69(4): 351-66.

  • Goff, S., Mount, M. & Jamison, R. (1990), “Employer Supported Child Care, Work/Family Conflict, and Absenteeism: A Field Study”, Personnel Psychology, 43(4): 793-809.

  • Greenhaus, J., Bedeian, A. & Mossholder, K. (1987), “Work Experiences and Job Performance and Feelings of Personal and Family Well-Being”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31: 200-15.

  • Greenhaus, J. & Beutell, N. (1985), “Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles”, Academy of Management Review, 10(1): 76- 88.

  • Grover, S. (1991), “Predicting the Perceived Fairness of Parental Leave Policies”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2): 247-55.

  • Grover, S. & Crooker, K. (1995), “Who Appreciates Family-Responsive Human Resource Policies? The Impact of Family-Friendly Policies on the Organizational Attachment of Parents and Non-Parents”, Personnel Psychology, 48(2): 271-88.

  • Haar, J. & Spell, C. (2004), “Programme Knowledge and Value of Work-Family Practices and Organizational Commitment”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15(6): 1040-55.

  • Hall, D. & Richter, J. (1998), “Balancing Work Life and Home Life: What can Organizations do to Help?”, Academy of Management Executive, 2(3): 213-23.

  • Kanter, R. (1977), Work and Family in the United States: A Critical Review and Agenda for Research and Policy, New York: Russell Sage.

  • Kirchmeyer, C. (1995), “Managing the Work- Nonwork Boundary: An Assessment of Organizational Responses”, Human Relations, 48(5): 515-36.

  • Konrad, A. & Mangel, R. (2000), “The Impact of Work-Life Programs on Firm Productivity”, Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 1225-37.

  • Kossek, E. (1990), “Diversity in Child Care Assistance Needs: Employee Problems, Preferences, and Work-Related Outcomes”, Personnel Psychology, 43(4): 769-91.

  • Kossek, E. & Nichol, V. (1992), “The Effects of On-Site Child Care on Employee Attitudes and Performance”, Personnel Psychology, 45(3): 485-509.

  • Lewis, S., Gambles, R. & Rapoport, R. (2007), “The Constraints of a ‘Work-Life Balance’ Approach: An International Perspective”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3): 360-73.

  • Major, B. (1993), “Gender, Entitlement and the Distribution of Family Labor”, Journal of Social Issues, 49: 141-59.

  • McManus, K., Korabik, K., Rosin, H. & Kelloway, K. (2002), “Employed Mothers and the Work-Family Interface: Does Family Structure Matter?”, Human Relations, 55(11): 1295-1311.

  • Milkovich, G. & Gomez, L. (1976), “Day Care and Selected Employee Work Behaviors”, Academy of Management Journal, 19(1): 111-15.

  • Miller, T. (1984), “The Effects of Employer-Supported Child Care on Employee Absenteeism, Turnover, Productivity, Recruitment, or Job Satisfaction: What is Claimed and What is Known”, Personnel Psychology, 37(2): 277-89.

  • Orthner, D. & Pittman, J. (1986), “Family Contributions to Work Commitment”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48: 573-81.

  • Rode, J. (2004), “Job Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction Revisited: A Longitudinal Test of an Integrated Model”, Human Relations, 57(9): 1205-30.

  • Saltzstein, A., Ting, Y. & Saltzstein, G. (2001), “Work-Family Balance and Job Satisfaction: The Impact of Family-Friendly Policies on Attitudes of Federal Government Employees”, Public Administration Review, 61(4): 452-67.

  • Thomas, L. & Ganster, D. (1995), “Impact of Family-Supportive Work Variables on Work-Family Conflict and Strain: A Control Perspective”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1): 6-15. Thompson, L. & Walker, A. (1989), “Gender in Families: Women and Men in Marriage, Work and Parenthood”, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51: 845-71.

  • Warren, J. & Johnson, P. (1995), “The Impact of Workplace Support on Work-Family Role Strain”, Family Relations, 44: 163-69.

  • Windebank. J. (2001), “Dual-Earner Couples in Britain and France: Gender Divisions of Domestic Labour and Parenting Work in Different Welfare States”, Work, Employment and Society, 15(2): 269-90.

  • Zeytinoglu, I., Cooke, G. & Mann, S. (2010), “Employer Offered Family Support Programs, Gender and Voluntary and Involuntary Part-Time Work”, Relations Industrielles, 65(2): 177-95.


Abstract Views: 326

PDF Views: 1




  • Employee Attitudes Towards Employer-Sponsored Child Care: Evidence from France

Abstract Views: 326  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Yvan Barel
University of Nantes, France, France
Sandrine Fremeaux
Audencia Nantes School of Management, France, France
Grant Michelson
Audencia Nantes School of Management, France, France

Abstract


The increasing numbers of women in the labour market and the rise in dual-career couples have prompted many organizations to introduce programmes to help their employees balance their work and personal lives. Positive employee perceptions of such initiatives have tended to be assumed rather than demonstrated. This study examines how a proposal for a worklife balance programme is actually viewed by employees. Drawing on survey data from 300 employees in a shopping centre in France, the study finds evidence of a range of attitudes. These attitudes are influenced not only by existing and potential constraints, but also by the possibility of the employees benefiting from child care as well as their views concerning the role of the organization. Attitudes towards the provision of child care are particularly positive when they seek to attenuate difficulties of work organization and are consistent with a flexible approach that takes employees' personal constraints into account.

References