Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Predictors & Outcomes of Employee Engagement: Implications for the Resource-based View Perspective


Affiliations
1 Chairperson-PGHR, India
2 Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper extends the resource based view of the firm to employee engagement and explores linkages with firm performance. It argues that employee engagement interacts with other intangible variables such as the sense of justice and psychological contract which an individual feels and expects, respectively. The individuals psychological contract is shaped by organizations HR policies along with many social cues from the work environment. This may affect the employee engagement. Further, there may be a positive effect of Employee Engagement on Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The entire equation may lead to high firm performance which in turn may affect Employee Engagement. It proposes a conceptual model of these intangible variables and their linkage with the tangible variable of firm performance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Arbuckle, J.& Wothke, W. (1999), AMOS 4, Users Guide, Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation,

  • Aryee. S.. Budhwar. P. & Chen, Z. (2002), Trust as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23: 267-85.

  • Bakker, A. B. (2009), Building Engagement in the Workplace in C. L. Cooper and R. J. Burke (Eds.),The Peak Performing Organization , Routledge.

  • Bakker, A. B.& Demerouti, E. (2007), The Job DemandsResources Model: State of the Art, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22: 309-28.

  • Barney, J. (1991), Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage, Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.

  • Baumruk, Ray; Gorman Jr., Bob; Gorman, Robert E.& Ingham, J., (2006), Why Managers Are Crucial to Increasing Engagement , Strategic HR Review, 5 (2):24-27

  • Bennet, Mick & Bell, Andrew (2004), Leadership and Talent in Asia, Hewitt, John Wiley and Sons(Asia) Pte Ltd., Singapore.

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2006), Measuring Organizational Learning in Indian Managers and Establishing Firm Performance Linkages, The Learning Organization , 13(5) : 416-33

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2007a), Talent Management Strategy of Employee Engagement of Indian ITES Employees: Key to Retention, Employee Relations, 29(6): 640-63

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2009a), Talent Management in Budhwar, P.& J. Bhatnagar (Eds.), A Changing Face of HRM in India, London: Routledge

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2009b),Mediators in Strategic HRM and Reverse Causality of Firm Performance in Indian Context, Paper presented at Academy of Management, 2008, conference, Anaheim, USA.

  • Bhatnagar, J.(2007), Predictors of Organizational Commitment in India: Strategic HR Roles, Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Learning Capability, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(9)

  • Boxall, P. & Purcell, J. (2003), Strategy and Human Resource Management ,Basingstoke, Palgrave McMillan

  • Cappelli P. & Neumark, D. (2001), Do High- Performance Work Practices Improve Establishment- Level Outcomes? Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(4):737-75.

  • Cartwright ,S., Holmes,N, (2006), The Meaning of Work: The Challenge of Regaining Employee Engagement and Reducing Cynicism Human Resource Management Review16, (2): 199-208

  • Cohen-Charash, Y. & Spector, P. (2001), The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Misanalysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86: 278- 321

  • Colarelli, S.M. (1984), Methods of Communication and Mediating Processes in Realistic Job Previews, Journal of Applied Psychology, 69: 633-42.

  • Colbert, B. A. (2004), The Complex Resourcebased View: Implications for Theory and Practice in Strategic Human Resource Management , Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 341-58.

  • Coleman, Alison(2005) Less Vacant, More Engaged. November , www.employeebenefits.co.uk, retrieved 15th July 2006

  • Colquitt, J. (2001), On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: a Construct Validation of a Measure, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 386-400.

  • Deci, E. L.& Ryan, R. M. (1985), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behaviour, New York, Plenum Press.

  • Delery, J.E. & Doty, D.H. (1996), Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Perspectives , Academy of Management Journal, 39: 802-05.

  • Ehin, C. Charles (2005), Hidden Assets Harnessing the Power of Informal Networks USA: Springer ISBN: 978-0-387-25682-5

  • Foss, Nicolai J. (1996), Harold Malmgrens Analysis of the Firm: Lessons for Modern Theorists? Review of Political Economy 8: 349-66

  • Foss, Nicolai J. & Ishikawa ,Ibuki (2006),Towards a Dynamic Resource-Based View: Insights from Austrian capital and Entrepreneurship Theory ,SMG Working Paper No. 6/2006 April 2006 ISBN: 87-91815- 22-3

  • Gagne´, M.& Deci, E. L. (2005), Self-determination Theory and Work Motivation, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331- 62

  • Gallup Management Journal (2006), http:// gmj.gallup.com. Earl , J. Dunn Lamp, M., Youve Gotten Employee Feedback. Now What? Workplace Surveys Are Meaningless Even Demoralizing Unless Companies Act on the Results (6 pgs.)

  • Glen, C. (2006), Key Skills Retention and Motivation: the War for Talent Still Rages and Retention is the High Ground, Industrial and Commercial Training, 38 (1):37-45.

  • Godard, J. (2001a), Beyond the High-Performance Paradigm? An Analysis of Variation in Canadian Managerial Perceptions of Reform Programme Effectiveness, British Journal of Industrial Relations 39(1):25- 52

  • Green, F. (2004), Why Has Work Effort Become More Intense? Industrial Relations 43(4):709

  • Halliden, B. & Monks, K. (2005), Employment Strategies in Call Centres.The Rcent Interest by Researchers in the Concept and Operation of the Call Centre Once, Personnel Review, 34 (3): 370-83.

  • Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. (1994), Competing for the Future, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Harter, James K.,Schmidt, Frank L.& Hayes, Theodore L. (2002a), Business-unit-level Relationship between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology. 87(2): 268-79

  • Harter, James K., Schmidt, Frank L. & Hayes, T.L. (2002b), Well Being in the Workplace and Its Relationship to Business Outcomes; A Review of the Gallup Studies. In C.L.

  • Keyes and J. Haidt (Eds.), Flourishing: The Positive Person and the Good Life ,Washington D.C, American Psychological Association.

  • Hopkins ,S. M. & Washington, B. L .(2006), The Relationships Between Justice Perceptions, Trust, And Employee Attitudes In A Downsized Organization, The Journal of Psychology, 140(5): 477-98.

  • Iverson, R. D. & Zatzick, C. D. (2007), High- Commitment Work Practices and Downsizing Harshness in Australian Workplaces , Industrial Relations, 46(3):456-80

  • Joo, Baek-Kyoo (Brian) & Mclean, G. N. (2006), Best Employer Studies: A Conceptual Model From A Literature Review and a Case Study, Human Resource Development Review 5 (2):228-57

  • Kahn, W. A (1992), Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement And Disengagement At Work, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990), An Exercise of Authority , Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 14(2): 28-42.

  • Kim, Hyo-Sook (2007), A Multilevel Study of Antecedents and a Mediator of Employee Organization Relationships, Journal Of Public Relations Research, 19 (2): 167-97

  • Lee, K. &Allen, N.J. (2002), Organizational Citizenship Behaviour and Workplace Deviance: the Role of Affect and Cognitions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 131-42.

  • Lewis, R. E.& Hackman , R. J. (2006), Talent Management: A Critical Review. Human Resource Management Review, 16(2): 139-54

  • Lin, C-P., Hung, W-T., & Chiu, C-K. (2008), Being good citizens: Understanding a Mediating Mechanism of Organizational Commitment and Social Network Ties in OCBs, Journal of Business Ethics, 81: 561-78.

  • Lockwood, Nancy R. (2006), Talent Management: Driver for Organizational Success HR Content Program, SHRM Research Quarterly

  • Loi , R., Hang-yue, N. & Foley S. (2006), Linking Employees Justice Perceptions to Organizational Commitment and Intention to Leave: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79: 101-20

  • Luthans, F.& Peterson, S.J. (2002), Employee Engagement and Manager Self- efficacy: Implications for Managerial Effectiveness and Development, Journal of Management Development, 21 (5):376-87.

  • Macey, W.H. & Schneider, B. (2008), The Meaning of Employee Engagement, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 3-30.

  • MacLeod, D. & Clarke, N. (2009), Engaging for Success: Enhancing Performance through Employee Engagement, London, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. Available at:http://www.berr.gov.uk/ whatwedo/employment/employee-engagement/ index.html

  • Martel, L. (2003), Finding and Keeping High Performers: Best Practices from 25 Best Companies, Employee Relations Today Published online in Wiley Inter Science (www.interscience.wiley.com).DOI 10.1002/ert.10072

  • May, D.R., Gilson, R.L. & Harter, L.M. (2004), The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness , Safety and Availability and the Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77:11-37.

  • Meyer, Alan D., Tsui Anne S & Hinings, C. R. (1993), Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis, The Academy of Management Journal, 36, (6) (Dec.) : 1175- 95

  • Meyer, John P. & Gagne´, Marylene (2008), Employee Engagement From a Self-Determination Theory Perspective, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 60-62.

  • Mishra, A. & Spreitzer, G. (1998), Explaining How Survivors Respond to Downsizing: The Roles of Trust, Empowerment, Justice and Work Redesign, Academy of Management Review, 23: 567-89.

  • Parsley, A. (2006), Road Map for Employee Enga-gement, Management Services, 50 (1):10-11.

  • Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntalianis, F. (2004), The Impact of Personality on Psychological Contracts, Academy of Management Journal, 47(3):350-67.

  • Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D., Harley, B. (2000), Employees and High-Performance Work Systems: Testing Inside the Black Box, British Journal of Industrial Relations 38(4):501-31

  • Robinson, D., Perryman, S. & Hayday, S. (2004), The Drivers of Employee Engagement, Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton.

  • Rothbard, N.P. (2001), Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 655-84.

  • Rousseau , D. M. (2004), Psychological Contracts in the Workplace: Understanding the Ties That Motivate, Academy of Management Executive,18(1).

  • Rousseau, D. & Fried, Y. (2001), Location, Location, Location: Contextualizing Organizational Research, Journal of Organizational Behaviour. 22: 1-13.

  • Ryan, RM Connell, JP (1989), Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5): 749-61.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006), Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement , Journal of Managerial Psychology. 21(7): 600- 19

  • Schaufeli, W. B. & Bakker, A. B. (2004), Job Demands, Job Resources, and Their Relationship with Burnout and Engagement: A Multi-sample Study, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25: 293-315.

  • Schneider, B., Hanges, P. J., Smith, D. B.& Salvaggio, A. N.(2003), Which Comes First: Employee Attitudes or Organizational Financial and Market Performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5):836- 51. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA

  • Schneider, S. (1993), National vs. Corporate Culture: Implications for HRM in V. Puick, N. M.Tichy and C.K.Barnett (eds.), Globalizing Management, New York: Wiley.

  • Seijts, G. H. & Crim, D. (2006), What Engages Employees the Most or the Ten Cs of Employee March/April 2006Reprint # 9B06TB09 Ivey Business Journal Online is published by Ivey Management Services, a Division of the Richard Ivey School of Business. ibjonline@ivey.ca. www.iveybusinessjournal.com SHRM Conference (2006), (http://www.isrinsight. com/pdf/media/2006engagement.pdf, retrieved 15th July 2006).

  • Sonnentag, S. (2003), Recovery, Work Engagement, and Proactive Behaviour: A New Look at the Interface between Non-work and Work, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 518-28.

  • Soupata, L. (2005), Engaging Employees in Company Success: The UPS Approach To A Winning Team, Human Resource Management, Spring, 44(1):95-98

  • Sturges, J., Conway, N., Guest, D., & Liefooghe, A. (2005). Managing the career deal: The psychological contract as a framework for understanding career management, organizational commitment and work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 821-38.

  • Teece, David J., Pisano, Gary & Shuen, Amy (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-53

  • Towers Perrin (2003), Talent Report: New Realities in Todays Workforce. http:// www.towersperrin.com/tp/showhtml. jsp?url=global/service-areas/research-andsurveys/ employee-research/ee-engagement. htmandcountry=global

  • Willem, A., Devos, A., Buelens, M. (2007), Differences Between Private And Public Sector Employees Psychological Contracts Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series 2007/02

  • Woodruffe, C. (2005), Employee Engagement, British Journal of Administrative Management, Dec2005/Jan 2006, (50):28-29.

  • Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti , E & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009), Work Engagement and Financial Returns: A Diary Study on the Role of Job and Personal Resources, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82:183-200.


Abstract Views: 602

PDF Views: 0




  • Predictors & Outcomes of Employee Engagement: Implications for the Resource-based View Perspective

Abstract Views: 602  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Jyotsna Bhatnagar
Chairperson-PGHR, India
Soumendu Biswas
Management Development Institute, Gurgaon, India

Abstract


This paper extends the resource based view of the firm to employee engagement and explores linkages with firm performance. It argues that employee engagement interacts with other intangible variables such as the sense of justice and psychological contract which an individual feels and expects, respectively. The individuals psychological contract is shaped by organizations HR policies along with many social cues from the work environment. This may affect the employee engagement. Further, there may be a positive effect of Employee Engagement on Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The entire equation may lead to high firm performance which in turn may affect Employee Engagement. It proposes a conceptual model of these intangible variables and their linkage with the tangible variable of firm performance.

References