Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Employee Engagement: Role of Self-efficacy, Organizational Support & Supervisor Support


Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Management-Lucknow, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the prevailing competitive environment, engaged employees are viewed as a strategic asset by both academicians and practicing managers alike. Although academicians have isolated various organizational conditions which they argue initiate engagement, there exists a lack of understanding on the observed variations in engagement levels between employees exposed to similar organizational conditions. Through theoretical arguments as well as empirical support, this study argues that differences between self-efficacy levels in employees are primarily responsible for differences in displayed engage-ment. Based on the findings the study argues and defines engage-ment as expressed empowerment pertaining to a role thus enriching the management literature conce-rning engagement. Suitable managerial implications are also discussed.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M. & Griffeth, R. W. (2003), “The Role of Perceived Organizational Support and Supportive Human Resource Practices in the Turnover Process”, Journal of Management, 29(1): 99 – 118.

  • Arvey, R. D., Bouchard, T. J. Jr., Segal, N. L. & Abraham, L. M. (1989), “Job Satisfaction: Environmental and Genetic Components”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74: 187-92.

  • Aziz, M. (2003), “Organisational Role Stress among Indian Information Technology Professionals”, Asian-Pacific Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety, 10(2): 31- 33.

  • Bandura, A. (1977), “Self – efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioural Change”, in Schyns, B. & von Collani, G. (2002), “A New Occupational Self- efficacy Scale and Its Relation to Personality Constructs and Organizational Variables,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11 (2): 219–41.

  • Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator – Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6): 1173–82.

  • Bernthal, P. (2004), “Measuring Employee Engagement”, in Macey, H. M. & Schnei-der, B. (2008), “The Meaning of Employee Engagement”, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 3–30.

  • Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983), Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd ed.). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

  • Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. N. (1988), “The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and practice”, Academy of Management Review, 13 (3): 471-82.

  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchinson, S. & Sowa, D. (1986), “Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71: 500 – 07.

  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I., & Rhoades, L. (2002), “Perceived Supervisor Support: Contributions to Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Retention”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (3): 565-73.

  • George, J. M. (1992), “The Role of Personality in Organizational Life: Issues and Evidence”, Journal of Management, 18: 185- 213.

  • Gibb, J. R. (1961), “Defensive Communication”, in Kahn, W. (1990), “Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4): 692-724.

  • Guzzo, R. A. & Noonan K. A. (1994), “Human Resource Practices as Communications and the Psychological Contract”, Human Resource Management, 33 (3): 447-62.

  • Hackman, J. R. & Oldham, G. R. (1980), Work Redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. House, R. J. (1971), “A Path Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 16 (3): 321–39.

  • Kahn, W. (1990), “Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4): 692-724.

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977), Men and Women of the Corporation, Basic Books, New York, NY Kowalski, B. (2003), “The Engagement Gap”, Training, 40 (4): 62.

  • Kraimer, M. L., Wayne, S. J. & Jaworski, R. A. (2001), “Sources of Support and Expatriate Performance: the Mediating Role of Expatriate Adjustment”, Personnel Psychology, 54 (1): 71–99.

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994), “Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 45 (1): 79–122.

  • Levinson, H. (1965), “Reciprocation: the Relationship between Man and Organi-zation”, Administrative Science Quarterly. 9: 370– 90.

  • Locke, E.A. (1976), “The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction”, in Dunnette, M.D. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL.

  • Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M. & Latham, G. P. (1981), “Goal Setting and Task Performance”, Psychological Bulletin, 90 (1): 125–52.

  • Macey, H. M. & Schneider, B. (2008), “The Meaning of Employee Engagement”, Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1: 3–30.

  • Martinko, M. & Gardner, W. L. (1982), “Learned Helplessness: an Alternative Explanation for Performance Deficits”, Academy of Management Review, 7(2): 195–220.

  • Maslach, C. & Leiter, M. P. (1997), “The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about It”, in Shirey, M. R. (2006), “Stress and Coping in Nurse Managers: Two Decades of Research”, Nursing Economics, 24 (4): 193–203.

  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L. & Harter, L. M. (2004), “The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness, Safety and Availability and the Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work”, Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 77: 11-37

  • Ozer, E. M. & Bandura, A. (1990), “Mechanisms Governing Empowerment Effects: A Self- Efficay Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58: 472-86.

  • Rafaeli, A. & Sutton, R. I. (1987), “The Expression of Emotion as Part of the Work Role”, in Kahn, W. (1990), “Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4): 692-724.

  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. & Armeli, S. (2001), “Affective Commitment to the Organization: the Contribution of Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5): 825-36.

  • Rigotti, T., Schyns, B. & Mohr, G. (2008), “A Short Version of the Occupational Selfefficacy Scale: Structural and Construct Validity Across Five Countries”, Journal of Career Assessment, 16 (2): 238–55.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006), “Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21 (7): 600- 19.

  • Schaufeli, W., Salanova, M., Gonza´lez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A.B. (2002), “The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: a Two- Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Ap proach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3: 71-92.

  • Schneider, B. (1987), “The People Make the Place”, Personnel Psychology, 40: 437–53.

  • Schwarzer, R. & Fuchs, R. (1995), “Changing Risk Behaviours and Adopting Health Behaviours: The Role of Self – efficacy Beliefs”, in Schyns, B. & von Collani, G. (2002), “A New Occupational Self -efficacy Scale and Its Relation to Personality Constructs and Organizational Variables”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11 (2): 219–41.

  • Schyns, B. & von Collani, G. (2002), “A New Occupational Self -efficacy Scale and Its Relation to Personality Constructs and Organizational Variables”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psy-chology, 11 (2): 219–41.

  • Seeman, M. (1972), “Alienation and Engagement”, in Campbell, A. & Converse, P. (Eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.

  • Sekaran, U. (1992), Research Methods for Business: A Skill-building Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

  • Shelton, S. H. (1990), “Developing the Construct of General Self-efficacy”, Psychological Reports, 66: 987–94.

  • Staw, B. M. & Ross, J. (1985), “Stability in the Midst of Change: A Dispositional Approach to Job Attitudes”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70: 469-80.

  • Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990), “Cognitive Elements of Empowerment”, Academy of Management Review, 15: 666–81.

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002), “Creative Self – efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance”, Academy of Management Journal, 45 (6): 1137–48.

  • Welbourne, T. (2007), “Engagement: Beyond the Fad and into the Executive Suite”, Leader to Leader, 44: 45-51.


Abstract Views: 554

PDF Views: 1




  • Employee Engagement: Role of Self-efficacy, Organizational Support & Supervisor Support

Abstract Views: 554  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Surya Prakash Pati
Indian Institute of Management-Lucknow, India
Pankaj Kumar
Indian Institute of Management-Lucknow, India

Abstract


In the prevailing competitive environment, engaged employees are viewed as a strategic asset by both academicians and practicing managers alike. Although academicians have isolated various organizational conditions which they argue initiate engagement, there exists a lack of understanding on the observed variations in engagement levels between employees exposed to similar organizational conditions. Through theoretical arguments as well as empirical support, this study argues that differences between self-efficacy levels in employees are primarily responsible for differences in displayed engage-ment. Based on the findings the study argues and defines engage-ment as expressed empowerment pertaining to a role thus enriching the management literature conce-rning engagement. Suitable managerial implications are also discussed.

References