Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

FIRO-B & Nurturant-Task Leadership Model: Moderating Influence of Individual Differences


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Vihar Lake, Mumbai 400087, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Present study explored relationships between interpersonal needs and leadership styles in superiorsubordinate context. Interpersonal behaviour defined by inclusion and affection dimensions of FIRO-B related more strongly to participative and nurturant dimensions than task behaviour dimension of leaders, while control expressed behaviour failed to show any relationship with task-orientation. Extroversion based on total scores of expressed components of FIRO-B demonstrated significant influence on task orientation, participative and nurturant leadership dimensions. However, inclusion and affection continued to sustain similar trend of relationship with the participative and nurturant dimensions, whereas control expressed behaviour partly confirmed relationship with task orientation being a fragment of nurturancetask dimension.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ansari, M (1990), Managing People at Work: Leadership Styles and Influence Strategies, New Delhi, Sage Publications.

  • Campbell, J.P, Dunnette, M.D, Lawler, E.E. III & Weick, K.E. Jr.(1970), Managerial Behaviour, Performance and Effectiveness, New York: McGraw-Hill

  • Di-Marco,N., Kuehl, C. & Wims, E (1975), “Leadership Style and Interpersonal Need Orientation as Moderators of Changes in Leadership Dimension Scores”, Personnel Psychology, 28(2): 207-13.

  • Fleishman, E.A (1953), “Leadership Climate, Human Relations Training and Supervisory Behaviour”, Personnel Psychology, 6: 205-22.

  • Hassan, A (1986), Subordinate and Task Characteristics as Moderators of Leadership Effectiveness, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Patna University, Patna.

  • Horne, T & Carron, A V(1985), “Compatibility in Coach-Athlete Relationships”, Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(2) :137-49.

  • Hurley,J. R., Feintuch, B. & Mandell, M.J. (1991), “Novice Leaders’ First Three Groups: Change and Consistency in Acceptance of Self and Others”, Journal of Social Psychology, 131(2): 233-45.

  • Ilgen, D R.,& O’Brien, G (1974), “Leader-member Relations in Small Groups”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12(3): 335-350.

  • Kuehl, C.R., Di-Marco, N. & Wims, E.W. (1975), “Leadership Orientation as a Function of Interpersonal Need Structure”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60 (1): 143-45.

  • Lundgren, D. C. & Knight, D. J.(1997), “Trainer Style and Member Attitudes toward Trainer and Group in T-Groups”, Small Group Behaviour, 8(1):47-64.

  • O’Brien, G.E. & Kabanoff, B. (1981), “The Effects of Leadership Style and Group Structure upon Small Group Productivity: A Test of a Discrepancy Theory of Leader Effectiveness”, Australian Journal of Psychology, 33(2): 157-68.

  • Polley, R.B. & Eid,J. G. (1994), “First among Equals: Leaders, Peers, and Choice”, Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 47(2): 59-76

  • Schutz, W (1958), FIRO-B: A Three Dimensional Theory of Interpersonal Behaviour, New York, Rinehart.

  • Sinha, J.B. P (1980), The Nurturant-Task Leader, New Delhi, Concept Publishing House.

  • Sinha, J.B.P (1995), The Cultural Context of Leadership and Power, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

  • Tucker, J. H. (1983), “Leadership Orientation as a Function of Interpersonal Need Structure: A Replication with Negative Results”, Small Group Behaviour, 14(1): 107-14.


Abstract Views: 352

PDF Views: 0




  • FIRO-B & Nurturant-Task Leadership Model: Moderating Influence of Individual Differences

Abstract Views: 352  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Omer Bin Sayeed
National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Vihar Lake, Mumbai 400087, India

Abstract


Present study explored relationships between interpersonal needs and leadership styles in superiorsubordinate context. Interpersonal behaviour defined by inclusion and affection dimensions of FIRO-B related more strongly to participative and nurturant dimensions than task behaviour dimension of leaders, while control expressed behaviour failed to show any relationship with task-orientation. Extroversion based on total scores of expressed components of FIRO-B demonstrated significant influence on task orientation, participative and nurturant leadership dimensions. However, inclusion and affection continued to sustain similar trend of relationship with the participative and nurturant dimensions, whereas control expressed behaviour partly confirmed relationship with task orientation being a fragment of nurturancetask dimension.

References