Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Influence Strategies & Organizational Success: Moderating Effect of Organizational Culture


Affiliations
1 Department of Business Administration, North Eastern Regional Institute of Management, Joya Nagar, Guwahati 781022, India
2 Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781 039, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study investigates how organizational culture affects the relationship between downward influence strategies and organizational success. Organizations were classified into two categories (participative and manipulative) and two separate sets of stepwise multiple regressions were performed for each dependent variable, considering influence strategies as independent variable and organizational success variables as dependent variables. The results indicate that participative culture encourages the use of personalized relationship, exchange of benefits and assertiveness, and discourages the use of asserting expertise and negative sanctions to facilitate the success of the organization. Personalized relationship may increase commitment but it is also likely to make organization less effective.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amarchand, D. & Jayaraj, B.J. (1992), Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness, New Delhi: Global Business Press.
  • Ansari, M.A. (1990), Managing People at Work: Leadership Styles and Influence Strategies, New Delhi: Sage.
  • Case, T., Dosier, L., Murkinson, G. & Keys, B. (1988), “How Managers Influence Superiors: A Study of Upward Influence Tactics”, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 9 (4): 25-31.
  • Cheng, J.L.C. (1983), “Organizational Context and Upward Influence: An Experimental Study of the Use of Power Tactics”, Group and Organization Studies, 8: 337-55.
  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. (1980), “New Work Attitude Measures of Trust, Organizational Commitment and Personal Need Fulfillment”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53: 39-52.
  • Cooke, R.A. & Lafferty, J.C. (1983), Level V: Organizational Culture Inventory - Form I, Plymouth, MI: Human Synergistics.
  • Dayal, I. (1976). Cultural Factors in Designing Performance Appraisal System. New Delhi: SRC of Industrial Relations and Human Resources.
  • DeCotis, T.A. & Summers, T.P. (1987), “A Path Analysis of a Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment”, Human Relations, 40(7): 445-70.
  • Dosier, L., Case, T. & Keys, B. (1988), “How Managers Influence Subordinates: An Empirical Study of Downward Influence Tactics”, Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 9 (5): 22-28.
  • Falbo, T. (1977), “Multidimensional Scaling of Power Strategies”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (8): 537-47.
  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975), Belief, Attitude and Intention in Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Greene, C.N. & Podsakoff, P.M. (1978), “Effects of Removal of Pay Incentives: A Field Experiment”, in Susbauer, J. C. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1978 Meeting of National Academy of Management: 206-10.
  • Homans, G. (1950), The Human Group, New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  • Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S.M. & Wilkinson, I. (1980), “Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One’s Way”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 65: 440-52.
  • Koch, J. L. & Steers, R.M. (1978), “Job Attachment, Satisfaction, and Turnover among Public Sector Employees”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 12: 119-128.
  • Mills, T. M. (1967), The Sociology of Small Groups, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.
  • Mott, P.E. (1972), The Characteristics of Effective Organization, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W. & Dubin, R. (1974), “Unit Performance, Situational Factors and Employee Attitudes in Spatially Separated Work Units”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12: 231-48.
  • Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M. & Porter, L.W. (1979), “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14: 224-47.
  • Niehoff, B.P., Enz, C.A. & Grover, R.A. (1990), “The Impact of Top Management Actions on Employee Attitudes and Perceptions”, Group and Organization Studies, 15 (3): 337- 52.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., Todor, W.D. & Skov, R. (1982), “Effects of Leader Contingent and Noncontingent Reward and Punishment Behaviours on Subordinate Performance and Satisfaction”, Academy of Management Journal, 25 (4): 810-21.
  • Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T. & Boulian, P.V. (1974), “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59: 603- 09.
  • Schein, E. H. (1990), “Organizational Culture”, American Psychologist, 45(2): 109-19.
  • Schmidt, W. K. & Locke, E. (1982), “A Study of Upward Influence in Organizations”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 27: 304- 16.
  • Schnake, M. E. (1983), “An Empirical Assessment of the Effects of Affective Response in the Measurement of Organizational Climate”, Personnel Psychology, 36: 791-807.
  • Singh, C.B.P. (1990), “Power Play in Public Sector: In Search of Work Culture”, Management and Labour Studies, 15: 61-68.
  • Singh, C.B.P. & Singh, R.R. (1994), “Managing People at Work through Influence Tactics”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 29 (3): 339-52.
  • Sinha, J.B.P. (1990), Work Culture in the Indian Context, New Delhi: Sage Publication.
  • Tjosvold, D. (1990), “Power in Cooperative and Competitive Organizational Contexts”, Journal of Social Psychology, 130 (2): 249- 58.
  • Tripathi, S. & Tripathi, N. (2001), “Influence Strategies and Organizational Success”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(3): 283-300.
  • Tripathi, S., Kapoor, A. & Tripathi, N. (2000), “Organizational Culture and Organizational Commitment”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 36(1): 24-40.
  • Uttal, B. (1983), The Corporate Culture Vultures, Fortune.
  • Yukl, G. (1990), Skills for Managers and Leaders, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Yukl, G. & Tracey, J.B. (1992), “Consequences of Influence Tactics Used with Subordinates, Peers and the Boss”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (4): 525-35.
  • Yukl, G.A. (1989), Leadership in Organizations, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Abstract Views: 329

PDF Views: 0




  • Influence Strategies & Organizational Success: Moderating Effect of Organizational Culture

Abstract Views: 329  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sangeeta Tripathi
Department of Business Administration, North Eastern Regional Institute of Management, Joya Nagar, Guwahati 781022, India
Nachiketa Tripathi
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781 039, India

Abstract


The study investigates how organizational culture affects the relationship between downward influence strategies and organizational success. Organizations were classified into two categories (participative and manipulative) and two separate sets of stepwise multiple regressions were performed for each dependent variable, considering influence strategies as independent variable and organizational success variables as dependent variables. The results indicate that participative culture encourages the use of personalized relationship, exchange of benefits and assertiveness, and discourages the use of asserting expertise and negative sanctions to facilitate the success of the organization. Personalized relationship may increase commitment but it is also likely to make organization less effective.

References