Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Theoretical Value of Studying Indian Multinationals


Affiliations
1 Centre for Emerging Markets, at Northeastern University, USA, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The rise of new multinationals in countries like India provides an opportunity to revisit and carefully construct theories of how firms internationalize-a topic on which extant theory is weak. Indian firms are "infant MNEs," unlike Western firms that are "mature MNEs." Indian firms are also internationalizing in a very different global context, and can do so on the basis of different competitive advantages, than MNEs that came before. Finally, research on Indian MNEs can help identify generic strategies for internationalization, examples of which are provided in the article. By pursuing the lines of inquiry proposed, research on Indian MNEs can contribute not just to better local practice but also to broader theory building about early-stage internationalization.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amsden, A. H. (2001), Rise of “the Rest”, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Athreye, Suma & Andrew Godley (2009), “Internationalization and Technological Leapfrogging in the Pharmaceutical Industry”, Industry and Corporate Change”, 18( 2): 295-323.

  • Bartlett, Christopher A & Sumantra Ghoshal (1989), Managing across Borders, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Caves, Richard E. (2007), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cheng, Joseph L. (2007), “Critical Issues in International Management Research: An Agenda for Future Advancement”. European Journal of Management, 1(1-2): 23-38.

  • Eden, Lorraine (2003), “A Critical Reflection and Some Conclusions on OLI”. in John Cantwell & Rajneesh Narula (eds.), International Business and the Eclectic Paradigm: Developing the OLI Framework, chapter 13: 277-97. London & New York: Routledge.

  • Evans, Philip & Thomas S. Wurster (2000), Blown to Bits: How the New Economy of Information Transforms Strategy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Farrell, Diana, Christian S. Folster, Susan Lund (2008), “Long-term Trends in the Global Capital Market”, McKinsey Quarterly, February.

  • Friedman, Thomas L (2005), The World is Flat, New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

  • Ghemawat, Pankaj (2007a), “Why the World isn’t Flat”, Foreign Policy, 159 (March/April): 54-60.

  • Ghemawat, Pankaj (2007b). Redefining Global Strategy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Guillen, Mauro ( 2009). The American Model of the Multinational Firm and the “New” Multinationals from Emerging Economies. Academy of Management Perspectives, (May): 23-35.

  • Hymer, Stephen (1976), The International Operation of National Firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Khanna, Tarun & Krishna Palepu (2006), “Emerging Giants: Building World-class Companies in Developing Countries,” Harvard Business Review, (October).

  • Khanna, T. & Krishna Palepu (2005), Spotting Institutional Voids in Emerging Markets. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, Note No. 9:106-014.

  • Knight, Gary A. & S. Tamer Cavusgil (1996), “The Born-global Firm: A Challenge to Tradi-tional Internationalization Theory,” in Tage Koed Madsen (ed.), Advances in Inter-national Marketing, Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press: 11-26.

  • Kogut, Bruce (1985), “Designing Global Strategies: Profiting from Operational Flexibility”, Sloan Management Review, 27 (1): 27-38.

  • Luo, Yadong & Rosalie L. Tung (2007), “International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises: A Springboard Perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 481-98.

  • Mathew, John (2002), Dragon Multinationals: A New Model for Global Growth, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Meyer, Klaus E. (2006), “Asian Management Research Needs More Self-confidence”, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23 (2): 119-37.

  • Michaels, Ed, Helen Handfield-Jones, & Beth Axelrod (2001), The War for Talent. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Porter, Michael E. (1986), Competition in Gobal Industries, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Ramamurti, Ravi (2009a), “Why Study Emerging-market Multinationals?”, in Ravi Ramamurti & Jitendra V. Singh (eds.) (2009a), op cit, chapter 1: 3-22.

  • Ramamurti, Ravi (2009b), “What Have We Learned about Emerging –market Multinationals?”, in Ravi Ramamurti & Jitendra V. Singh (eds.)(2009a), op cit, chapter 13: 399-426.

  • Ramamurti Ravi & Jitendra V. Singh (eds.) (2009a), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Ramamurti, Ravi & Jitendra V. Singh (2009b), “Indian Multinationals: Generic Internationalization Strategies”, in Ramamurti & Singh (eds.)(2009a), op cit, chapter 6:110-66.

  • Rivkin, Jan (2000), Imitation of complex strategies, Management Science, 46, 6: 824-44.

  • Rugman (1981), Inside the Multinationals. The Economics of Internal Markets, New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Tsui, Anne (2007), “From Homogenization to Pluralism: International Management Research in the Academy and Beyond”, Academy of Management Journal, 50(6): 1353-64.

  • Vernon, Raymond (1966), “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 80: 255-267.

  • Vernon, Raymond (1983), Two Hungry Giants: The US and Japan in the Quest for Oil and Ores, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Wells, Louis T. Jr. (1983), Third World Multinationals: The Rise of Foreign Investment from Developing Countries, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Wilkins, Mira (1986), “Japanese Multinational Enterprises before 1914”. Business History Review, 60 (2): 199-232.

  • Williamson, Peter Ming Zeng (2009), “Chinese Multinationals: Emerging Through New Global Gateways”, in Ramamurti & Singh (2009a), op cit, chapter 5: 81-109.

  • Zaheer, Sri (1995), “Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness”. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2)(April): 341-63.


Abstract Views: 424

PDF Views: 0




  • The Theoretical Value of Studying Indian Multinationals

Abstract Views: 424  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ravi Ramamurti
Centre for Emerging Markets, at Northeastern University, USA, United States

Abstract


The rise of new multinationals in countries like India provides an opportunity to revisit and carefully construct theories of how firms internationalize-a topic on which extant theory is weak. Indian firms are "infant MNEs," unlike Western firms that are "mature MNEs." Indian firms are also internationalizing in a very different global context, and can do so on the basis of different competitive advantages, than MNEs that came before. Finally, research on Indian MNEs can help identify generic strategies for internationalization, examples of which are provided in the article. By pursuing the lines of inquiry proposed, research on Indian MNEs can contribute not just to better local practice but also to broader theory building about early-stage internationalization.

References