International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analysis of Factors Influencing E-WOM Credibility


Affiliations
1 International Business & Management, Centre for Business, George Brown College Toronto, Ontario, Canada
2 School of Business, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, Bangladesh
3 University of Texas – Rio Grande Valley, Texas, United States
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


As the use of Internet is getting more widespread and people are putting more trust on the Internet-based information, a new form of word of mouth termed as electronic word of mouth (E-WOM) has been developed. People receive E-WOM messages from social media, consumer review sites, discussion forums etc. Researches say that people tend to rely on E-WOM messages as much as they do on personal word of mouth. But what variables influence E-WOM credibility? After conducting an intensive background research on this topic this study has been able to identify certain variables such as E-WOM's quantity, polarity, logic and articulation, source and user's prior knowledge/expertise that affect E-WOM credibility. Based on the identified variables a survey was conducted on the students of 10 private and public universities of Bangladesh with a view to measure the effect of those variables on the E-WOM credibility. The regression analysis result indicates the quantity of E-WOM and the source of E-WOM has significant impact on E-WOM credibility. While, the designed model overall with all the included variables came strongly significant in explaining E-WOM credibility. In addition, to measure the internal consistency and correlation of the variables Cronbach's Alpha technique and correlation analysis are also conducted which have brought satisfactory outcome. From a strategic point of view, this study is useful for the modern marketers who want to use E-WOM to promote their products or services. By focusing on the predictor variables which have impact on E-WOM credibility, they can be able to enhance the effectiveness of their marketing strategy with a very cost efficient and a time savvy manner.

Keywords

E-WOM, Logic and Articulation, Marketing Communication, Polarity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abalaesei, M., & Sandu, R. M. (2015). Factors influencing the adoption of electronic word of mouth. SEA: Practical Application of Science, 3(3).

  • Al Karim, R. (2013). Customer satisfaction in online shopping: A study into the reasons for motivations and inhibitions. Journal of Business and Management, 11(6), 13-20.

  • Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5-17.

  • Arndt, J. (1967). Word-of-mouth advertising and informal communication D.F. Cox (Ed.), Risk-Taking and Information-Handling in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, Boston (1967), 188-239.

  • Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumer-opinion platforms. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 218-225.

  • Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477-491.

  • Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470.

  • Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229-247.

  • Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: Informational and normative determinants of online consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9-38.

  • Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.

  • Doh, S. J., & Hwang, J. S. (2009). How consumers evaluate e-WOM (electronic word-of-mouth) messages. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(2), 193-197.

  • Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales - An empirical investigation of the movie industry. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 233-242.

  • Engel, J. E., Blackwell, R. D., & Kegerreis, R. J. (1969). How information is used to adopt an Innovation Journal of Marketing Research, 9(1969), 3-8.

  • Goldsmith, R. E. (2006). Electronic word-of-mouth. Encyclopedia of E-Commerce, E-Government and Mobile Commerce, 408-412.

  • Gupta, P., & Harris, J. (2010). How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research, 63(9), 1041-1049.

  • Havaldar, K. K., & Dash, M. (2009). A Study on the Importance of Word-Of-Mouth Communication to Business Buyers. Available at SSRN 1934170.

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumeropinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.

  • Huang, J. H., & Chen, Y. F. (2006). Herding in online product choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23(5), 413-428.

  • Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. (1955). Personal influence free press. New York.

  • Lee, J., Park, D.-H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341.

  • Lerrthaitrakul, W., & Panjakajornsak, V. (2014). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth factors on consumers’ buying decision-making processes in the low cost carriers: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 5(2), 142.

  • Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458-468.

  • Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2005). Viral marketing: The use of surprise. In I.C. Clarke and T.B. Flaherty (eds.), Advances in Electronic Marketing, (122-138), Idea Group, Hershey, PA.

  • O’Reilly, K., & Marx, S. (2011). How young, technical consumers assess online WOM credibility. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(4), 330-359.

  • Park, C., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., & Kang, Y. R. (2011). Factors influencing e-WOM effects: Using experience, credibility, and susceptibility. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(1), 74.

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. NAAdvances in Consumer Research, 11.

  • Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: A pilot study. Journal of Marketing, 47(Winter), 68-78.

  • Richins, L., & Root-Shaffer, T. (1987). The role of involvement and opinion leadership in consumer wordofmouth: an implicit model made explicit M.J. Houston (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 32-36.

  • Smith, T., Coyle, J. R., Lightfoot, E., & Scott, A. (2007). Reconsidering models of influence: the relationship between consumer social networks and word-of-mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 387-397. DOI: 10.2501/S0021849907070407.


Abstract Views: 353

PDF Views: 0




  • Analysis of Factors Influencing E-WOM Credibility

Abstract Views: 353  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Fatema Tuz Zohora
International Business & Management, Centre for Business, George Brown College Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nazia Choudhury
School of Business, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh, Bangladesh
Md. Nazmus Sakib
University of Texas – Rio Grande Valley, Texas, United States

Abstract


As the use of Internet is getting more widespread and people are putting more trust on the Internet-based information, a new form of word of mouth termed as electronic word of mouth (E-WOM) has been developed. People receive E-WOM messages from social media, consumer review sites, discussion forums etc. Researches say that people tend to rely on E-WOM messages as much as they do on personal word of mouth. But what variables influence E-WOM credibility? After conducting an intensive background research on this topic this study has been able to identify certain variables such as E-WOM's quantity, polarity, logic and articulation, source and user's prior knowledge/expertise that affect E-WOM credibility. Based on the identified variables a survey was conducted on the students of 10 private and public universities of Bangladesh with a view to measure the effect of those variables on the E-WOM credibility. The regression analysis result indicates the quantity of E-WOM and the source of E-WOM has significant impact on E-WOM credibility. While, the designed model overall with all the included variables came strongly significant in explaining E-WOM credibility. In addition, to measure the internal consistency and correlation of the variables Cronbach's Alpha technique and correlation analysis are also conducted which have brought satisfactory outcome. From a strategic point of view, this study is useful for the modern marketers who want to use E-WOM to promote their products or services. By focusing on the predictor variables which have impact on E-WOM credibility, they can be able to enhance the effectiveness of their marketing strategy with a very cost efficient and a time savvy manner.

Keywords


E-WOM, Logic and Articulation, Marketing Communication, Polarity.

References