International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

The Integrated Conceptual Framework for Understanding Perceived Brand Equity in Professional Sports Teams


Affiliations
1 Department of Sports Science, Bindura University of Science Education, Zimbabwe
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Although the subject of perceived brand equity in professional sport has been subjected to substantial academic research, there are notable inconsistencies on the dimensions, antecedents and market consequences of brand equity in existing sport brand equity conceptual frameworks. This paper proposes the “Integrated Con-ceptual Framework for Understanding Perceived Brand Equity in Professional Sports Teams” as a contribution towards developing a conceptual understanding that can bridge existing conceptual inconsistencies in the subject area. The Framework was developed from the research findings of an exploratory sequential mixed methods study which was conducted in Zimbabwe, following an extensive review of existing sports brand equity conceptual frameworks. The Framework classifies the antecedents of perceived brand equity in professional sports teams into “Experience-Induced Antecedents”, “Macro Marketing Environment-Induced Antecedents” and “Management-Induced Antecedents”. These antecedents do not apply uniformly across different sport settings. As a results, the different conceptualizations of the antecedents of sports team brand equity in existing conceptual frameworks can be partly attributed to the fact that the frameworks were derived from studies that were carried out in different sport settings. In some cases, there are no tangible content differences, the inconsistences are only in terms of the narrations used to describe the antecedents by different scholars. Dimensionally, the proposed Integrated Conceptual Framework for Understanding Perceived Brand Equity in Professional Sports Teams departs from this traditional conceptualizations of the dimensions of brand equity by noting that team sport brand equity is an aggregate of Brand Awareness, Brand Associations and Brand Relationship. Thus, the framework views Brand Relationship as an additional brand equity dimension, an insight that has not been explicitly captured in existing conceptual frameworks. The Conceptual Framework also illustrates how perceived professional sports team brand equity can generate negative and positive marketplace outcomes. The Proposed Framework supports the theoretical foundations on the dimensions, antecedents and market consequences of sports team brand equity captured in existing literature and goes further to provide new insights and an improved theoretical understanding of these elements.

Keywords

Experience-Induced Antecedents, Macro Marketing Environment-Induced Antecedents, Management-Induced Antecedents, Dimensions of Perceived Brand Equity and Market Consequences of Perceived Brand Equity.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand equity: Capitalising on the value of a brand name. New York, NY: The Free Press.

  • Arai, A., Ko, Y. J., & Kaplanidou, K. (2013). Athlete brand image: Scale development and model test. European Sport Management Quarterly, 13(4), 383–403.

  • Arai, A., Ko, Y. J., & Ross, R. (2014), Branding athletes: Exploration and conceptualization of athlete brand image. Sport Management Review, 17, 97–106.

  • Bauer, H. H., Sauer, N. E., & Schmit, T. P. (2005). Customer-based brand equity in the team sport industry: Operationalisation and impact on the economic success of sport teams. European Journal of Marketing, 39(5/6), 496–515.

  • Bauer, H. H., Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., & Exler, S. (2008). Brand image and fan loyalty in professional team sport: A refined model and empirical assessment. Journal of Sport, 22, 205–226.

  • Berry, L. (2000). Cultivating service brand equity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 128–137.

  • Biscaia, R., Correia, A., Rosado, A., Maroco, J., & Ross, S. (2013). Spectator-based brand equity in professional soccer. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 22(1), 20–32.

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.

  • Charumbira, L. T. (2013). The philosophical and methodological approaches used by sport and business management student researchers in Zimbabwe. Global Journal of Commerce and Management Perspective, 2(6), 51–56.

  • Charumbira, L. T. (2014). The effectiveness of the sports marketing strategies used by zimbabwean collegiate sports federations. International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, 3(3/4), 66–75.

  • Charumbira, L. T. (2015). Perceived brand equity in professional sports teams: A Zimbabwean Consumers’ Perspective. Asian Business Review, 5(3), 131–140.

  • Charumbira, L. T. (2016). Proposing the sports team brand hierarchy conceptual Framework. International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, 5(1), 12–20.

  • Charumbira, L. T., & Charumbira, J. (2015). The use of sports sponsorship as a brand equity building tool by Zimbabwean companies. Global Journal of Commerce and Management Perspective, 4(4), 19–25.

  • Charumbira, L. T., & Stotlar, D. K. (2015a). Introducing a conceptual framework for understanding sponsor-based brand equity in professional sports teams. Journal of Marketing, 3(6), 1–11.

  • Charumbira, L. T., & Stotlar, D. K. (2015b). Unpacking the integrative conceptual framework for assessing perceived brand equity in professional sports teams. Journal of Sports Management, 1(2), 1–15.

  • Charumbira, L. T., & Stotlar, D. K. (2015c). Developing a conceptual framework for assessing media-based brand equity in professional sports teams. Journal of Sports Management, 1(2), 1–11.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Gladden, J. M., & Funk, D. C. (2002). Developing an understanding of brand associations in team Sport: Empirical evidence from consumers of professional sport. Journal of Sport Management, 16, 54–81.

  • Gladden, J. M., & Milne, G. R. (1999). Examining the importance of brand equity in professional sport. Sports Marketing Quarterly, 8(1), 54–81.

  • Gladden, J. M., Milne, G. R., & Sutton, W. (1998). A conceptual framework for assessing brand equity in division I athletics. Journal of Sports Management, 12(1), 1–19.

  • Kaynak, E., Salman, G. G., & Tatoglu, E. (2008), An integrative framework linking brand associations and brand loyalty in professional sports. Journal of Brand Management, 15, 336–357.

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualising, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1–22.

  • Kerr, A., & Gladden, J. M. (2008). Extending the understanding of professional team brand equity to the global marketplace. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 3(1/2), 58–77.

  • Kunkel, T., Funk, D., & King, C. (2014). Developing a conceptual understanding of consumer-based league brand associations. Journal of Sports Management, 28(1), 49–67.

  • Naik, A. Y., & Gupta, A. (2013). Illuminating viewerbased brand equity in sports. International Journal of Engineering and Management Sciences, 4(2), 160–172.

  • Ross, S. (2006). A conceptual framework for understanding spectator-based brand equity. Journal of Sport Management, 20(1), 22–38.

  • Ross, S., James, J., & Vargas, P. (2006), Development of a scale to measure team brand associations in professional sport. Journal of Sport Management, 20(2), 260–279.

  • Ross, S., Russell, K., & Bang, H. (2008). An empirical assessment of spectator-based brand equity. Journal of Sport Management, 22(3), 322–337.

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.


Abstract Views: 314

PDF Views: 0




  • The Integrated Conceptual Framework for Understanding Perceived Brand Equity in Professional Sports Teams

Abstract Views: 314  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Lysias Tapiwanashe Charumbira
Department of Sports Science, Bindura University of Science Education, Zimbabwe

Abstract


Although the subject of perceived brand equity in professional sport has been subjected to substantial academic research, there are notable inconsistencies on the dimensions, antecedents and market consequences of brand equity in existing sport brand equity conceptual frameworks. This paper proposes the “Integrated Con-ceptual Framework for Understanding Perceived Brand Equity in Professional Sports Teams” as a contribution towards developing a conceptual understanding that can bridge existing conceptual inconsistencies in the subject area. The Framework was developed from the research findings of an exploratory sequential mixed methods study which was conducted in Zimbabwe, following an extensive review of existing sports brand equity conceptual frameworks. The Framework classifies the antecedents of perceived brand equity in professional sports teams into “Experience-Induced Antecedents”, “Macro Marketing Environment-Induced Antecedents” and “Management-Induced Antecedents”. These antecedents do not apply uniformly across different sport settings. As a results, the different conceptualizations of the antecedents of sports team brand equity in existing conceptual frameworks can be partly attributed to the fact that the frameworks were derived from studies that were carried out in different sport settings. In some cases, there are no tangible content differences, the inconsistences are only in terms of the narrations used to describe the antecedents by different scholars. Dimensionally, the proposed Integrated Conceptual Framework for Understanding Perceived Brand Equity in Professional Sports Teams departs from this traditional conceptualizations of the dimensions of brand equity by noting that team sport brand equity is an aggregate of Brand Awareness, Brand Associations and Brand Relationship. Thus, the framework views Brand Relationship as an additional brand equity dimension, an insight that has not been explicitly captured in existing conceptual frameworks. The Conceptual Framework also illustrates how perceived professional sports team brand equity can generate negative and positive marketplace outcomes. The Proposed Framework supports the theoretical foundations on the dimensions, antecedents and market consequences of sports team brand equity captured in existing literature and goes further to provide new insights and an improved theoretical understanding of these elements.

Keywords


Experience-Induced Antecedents, Macro Marketing Environment-Induced Antecedents, Management-Induced Antecedents, Dimensions of Perceived Brand Equity and Market Consequences of Perceived Brand Equity.

References