Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Sustainable Coffee Marketing:Challenges and the Way Forward


Affiliations
1 Ph.D. Student, Agriculture Department and Rural Transformation Centre (ADRTC), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Nagarabhavi, Bangalore-560 072, India
2 Professor and Head, Agriculture Department and Rural Transformation Centre (ADRTC), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Nagarabhavi, Bangalore-560 072, India
3 Assistant Professor, Agricultural Economics, College of Horticulture, Shivaji Nagar, Pune- 411 005, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper analyzed markets for sustainable coffee by taking into account five individual sustainable coffee initiatives, that is, 4C (Common Codes for Coffee Community), Utz, Rainforest Alliance (RFA), Fair-trade Labeling Organization (FLO), and Organic coffee. The sustainable coffee production experienced a phenomenal growth over the past decade. However, the volumes of sales represent only a minor portion of production. Less than 25% of sustainable coffee produced was 'actually sold' as sustainable, while the remaining was just sold as 'ordinary' conventional coffee, without receiving any extra market benefits. Among the individual coffee certification initiatives, 4C (Common Codes for Coffee Community) signaled a more serious over-supply in the global market, wherein only 6% of its overall sustainable production was actually sold as sustainable over 2008-12. During the same period, Utz coffee certification could sell 25%, Rainforest Alliance (RFA) could trade 50%, and organic certified coffee could sell 55% of its standard-compliant production as sustainable. The study revealed that global sustainable coffee market is characterized by massive 'over-supply'; demand being a major constraint. Underpinning this issue is the need for sustainable coffee market. The current market challenge is to stabilize mismatch between demand and supply for sustainable coffee. From a sustainable development perspective, this remains a serious matter of concern for policy makers, public institutions, and multi-stakeholders to engage in market-based control mechanism in constructing effective 'supply- management base' as a strategy for price-stabilization and to enhance further sustainable growth. At a micro level in India, coffee certification is still at an infancy stage, contributing to just 2% of total global sustainable production. The Indian Coffee Board and apex coffee organizations need to work in this direction to encourage both sustainable production and marketing, so as to assist growers in assessing preferential market benefits, besides supporting high quality 'Indian coffee' being traded at both the global and domestic levels.

Keywords

Sustainable Coffee, Certification, Standards, Markets, Price Premiums

Paper Submission Date : August 7, 2015 ; Paper sent back for Revision : December 8, 2015 ; Paper Acceptance Date : December 12, 2015.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 285

PDF Views: 0




  • Sustainable Coffee Marketing:Challenges and the Way Forward

Abstract Views: 285  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Gana Shruthy M. K.
Ph.D. Student, Agriculture Department and Rural Transformation Centre (ADRTC), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Nagarabhavi, Bangalore-560 072, India
Parmod Kumar
Professor and Head, Agriculture Department and Rural Transformation Centre (ADRTC), Institute for Social and Economic Change (ISEC), Nagarabhavi, Bangalore-560 072, India
Jyothi Pravin Yadav
Assistant Professor, Agricultural Economics, College of Horticulture, Shivaji Nagar, Pune- 411 005, India

Abstract


This paper analyzed markets for sustainable coffee by taking into account five individual sustainable coffee initiatives, that is, 4C (Common Codes for Coffee Community), Utz, Rainforest Alliance (RFA), Fair-trade Labeling Organization (FLO), and Organic coffee. The sustainable coffee production experienced a phenomenal growth over the past decade. However, the volumes of sales represent only a minor portion of production. Less than 25% of sustainable coffee produced was 'actually sold' as sustainable, while the remaining was just sold as 'ordinary' conventional coffee, without receiving any extra market benefits. Among the individual coffee certification initiatives, 4C (Common Codes for Coffee Community) signaled a more serious over-supply in the global market, wherein only 6% of its overall sustainable production was actually sold as sustainable over 2008-12. During the same period, Utz coffee certification could sell 25%, Rainforest Alliance (RFA) could trade 50%, and organic certified coffee could sell 55% of its standard-compliant production as sustainable. The study revealed that global sustainable coffee market is characterized by massive 'over-supply'; demand being a major constraint. Underpinning this issue is the need for sustainable coffee market. The current market challenge is to stabilize mismatch between demand and supply for sustainable coffee. From a sustainable development perspective, this remains a serious matter of concern for policy makers, public institutions, and multi-stakeholders to engage in market-based control mechanism in constructing effective 'supply- management base' as a strategy for price-stabilization and to enhance further sustainable growth. At a micro level in India, coffee certification is still at an infancy stage, contributing to just 2% of total global sustainable production. The Indian Coffee Board and apex coffee organizations need to work in this direction to encourage both sustainable production and marketing, so as to assist growers in assessing preferential market benefits, besides supporting high quality 'Indian coffee' being traded at both the global and domestic levels.

Keywords


Sustainable Coffee, Certification, Standards, Markets, Price Premiums

Paper Submission Date : August 7, 2015 ; Paper sent back for Revision : December 8, 2015 ; Paper Acceptance Date : December 12, 2015.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom%2F2016%2Fv46%2Fi1%2F85745