Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Understanding Organisational Commitment and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour in Context of Work From Home Virtual Leadership During Covid-19 - Pandemic in India


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, GNA University, Phagwara, Punjab, India
 pdf    

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The COVID-19 induced lockdown had forced the organisations to adopt work from home (WFH) , putting virtual leadership to test. The article aims to explore the employee’s ability to learn and adapt to a new work environment at home through organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitment influenced by virtual leadership. Organisational Commitment Scale (OCS) was used using the Likert scale (5 points) with virtual leadership contribution, and employee commitment as variables in conducting virtual duties. The findings revealed that the transformational leadership in the virtual work environment pattern shows that employee’s willingness, individually and in teams, require reward to influence behaviour. OCB was found to be task-based as active and passive leadership management coupled with charismatic leadership was found to influence change in employee behaviour, overcome challenges, and show allegiance to leadership inputs during virtual work processes and methods. The results indicated that commitment from employees is conditional in the work from home (WFH) context, while the role of leadership abilities to influence OCB is dependent on culture, willingness and readiness. It is backed by leadership coaching and training for easier employee transition towards a work environment that is an individual and team level commitment output shaped by forces of psychosocial needs.

Keywords

Organisational Commitment, Organisational Citizenship Behavior, Work from Home, Virtual Leadership
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abelsen, S. N., Vatne, S. H., Mikalef, P., & Choudrie, J. (2021). Digital working during the COVID-19 pandemic: How task–technology fit improves work performance and lessens feelings of loneliness. Information Technology & People.

  • Achmad, S. H. (2017). The effect of competency, motivation, and organizational culture on the employee performance at the Jyakarta hotel, Bandung, Indonesia. Journal of Business on Hospitality and Tourism, 2(1), 120-130.

  • Acquaah, M. (2004). Human factor theory, organizational citizenship behaviors and human resources management practices: An integration of theoretical constructs and suggestions for measuring the human factor. Review of Human Factor Studies, 10(1).

  • Aitken-Fox, E., Coffey, J., Dayaram, K., Fitzgerald, S., Gupta, C., McKenna, S., & Wei Tian, A. (2020). COVID-19 has put trust front and centre in human resources management. LSE Business Review.

  • Alfehaid, L., & Mohamed, E. E. (2019). Understanding the influence of e-leadership on virtual team performance empirical study. Int. J. Bus. Appl. Soc. Sci, 5, 21-36.

  • Am, E. N., Affandi, A., Udobong, A., & Sarwani, S. (2020). Implementation of human resource management in the adaptation period for new habits. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 19-26.

  • Awada, M., Lucas, G., Becerik-Gerber, B., & Roll, S. (2021). Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic: impact on office worker productivity and work experience. Work, (Preprint), 1-19.

  • Bast, R. A. (2019). The moderating role of a hopeful career state and the mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between job demands and turnover intentions of hotel front office employees in the United States. The Pennsylvania State University.

  • Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 912-922.

  • Byrd, L. (2019). Virtual action learning for virtual leadership development. Performance Improvement, 58(8-9), 20-25.

  • Caligiuri, P., de Cieri, H., Minbaeva, D., Verbeke, A., & Zimmermann, A. (2020). International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 697-713.

  • Cascio, W. F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 81-90.

  • Caulat, G. (2012). Virtual leadership. Libri Publishing Limited.

  • Chanana, N. (2021). Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4).

  • Chanana, N. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on employees organizational commitment and job satisfaction in reference to gender differences. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4).

  • Chiaburu, D. S., Lorinkova, N. M., & van Dyne, L. (2013). Employees’ social context and change-oriented citizenship: A meta-analysis of leader, coworker, and organizational influences. Group & Organization Management, 38(3), 291-333. Chiang, C. F., & Hsieh, T. S. (2012). The impacts of perceived organizational support and psychological empowerment on job performance: The mediating effects of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(1), 180-190.

  • DasGupta, P. (2011). Literature review: E-leadership. Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(1), 1-36.

  • Dekas, K. H., Bauer, T. N., & Welle, B. (2013). A review and qualitative investigation of organizational citizenship behaviors for knowledge workers at Google and beyond. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(3), 219-237.

  • Eisenberg, J., & Krishnan, A. (2018). Addressing virtual work challenges: Learning from the field. Organization Management Journal, 15(2), 78-94.

  • Ekhsan, M., Badrianto, Y., Fahlevi, M., & Rabiah, A. S. (2020). Analysis of the effect of learning orientation, role of leaders and competence to employee performance front office the Sultan Hotel Jakarta. In 4th International Conference on Management, Economics and Business (ICMEB 2019) (pp. 239-244). Atlantis Press.

  • Emami, M., Alizadeh, Z., Nazari, K., & Darvishi, S. (2012). Antecedents and consequences of organisational citizenship behaviour (OCB). Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 494-505.

  • Farooq, R., & Sultana, A. (2021). The potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on work from home and employee productivity. Measuring Business Excellence. doi:10.1108/MBE-12-2020-0173

  • Fein, E. C., Skinner, N., & Machin, M. A. (2017). Work intensification, work-life interference, stress, and well-being in Australian workers. International Studies of Management & Organization, 47(4), 360-371.

  • Ford, D., Storey, M. A., Zimmermann, T., Bird, C., Jaffe, S., Maddila, C., Butler, J. L., Houck, B., & Nagappan, N. (2021). A tale of two cities: Software developers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 31(2), 1-37.

  • Geldenhuys, M., Taba, K., & Venter, C. M. (2014). Meaningful work, work engagement and organizational commitment. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 1-10.

  • Green, N., Tappin, D., & Bentley, T. (2020). Working from home before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for workers and organizations. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 45(2), 5-16.

  • Guinalíu, M., & Jordán, P. (2016). Building trust in the leader of virtual work teams. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 20(1), 58-70.

  • Harris, A., Jones, M., & Baba, S. (2013). Distributed leadership and digital collaborative learning: A synergistic relationship? British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(6), 926-939.

  • Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Johnson, L. C., & Andrey, J. (2013). Remixing work, family and leisure: Teleworkers’ experiences of everyday life. New Technology, Work and Employment, 28(2), 130-144.

  • Ismail, F. (2021). Impact of pandemic COVID-19 on human resources management. Advances in Humanities and Contemporary Studies, 2(1), 1-7.

  • Jernigan, D. B., COVID, C., & Team, R. (2020, February 24). Update: public health response to the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak—United States. February 24, 2020. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(8), 216-219.

  • Jung, H. S., & Yoon, H. H. (2015). The impact of employees’ positive psychological capital on job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors in the hotel. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 1135-1156.

  • Kao, R. H. (2017). Task-oriented work characteristics, self-efficacy, and service-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level analysis of the moderating effect of social work characteristics and collective efficacy. Personnel Review, 46(4), 718-739.

  • Kataria, A., Garg, P., & Rastogi, R. (2012). Employee engagement and organizational effectiveness: The role of organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 6(1), 102-113.

  • Katz, H. C., Kochan, T. A., & Weber, M. R. (1985). Assessing the effects of industrial relations systems and efforts to improve the quality of working life on organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 509-526.

  • Kaushik, M., & Guleria, N. (2020). The impact of pandemic COVID-19 in workplace. European Journal of Business and Management, 12(15), 1-10.

  • Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83-106.

  • Khaola, P. P., & Coldwell, D. A. (2017). Striking a balance between types of organizational citizenship behaviour. Southern African Business Review, 21(1), 222-242.

  • Khaola, P. P., & Sebotsa, T. (2015). Person-organisation fit, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour. Danish Journal of Management and Business Sciences, 7, 67-74.

  • Makarius, E. E., & Larson, B. Z. (2017). Changing the perspective of virtual work: Building virtual intelligence at the individual level. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(2), 159-178.

  • Marescaux, E., de Winne, S., & Sels, L. (2013). HR practices and affective organizational commitment: (When) does HR differentiation pay off? Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 329-345.

  • Marneros, S., Papageorgiou, G., & Efstathiades, A. (2020). Identifying key success competencies for the hospitality industry: The perspectives of professionals. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 20(4), 237-261.

  • Mehtab, K., ur Rehman, A., Ishfaq, S., & Jamil, R. A. (2017). Virtual leadership: A review paper. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(4-1), 183-193.

  • Melián-González, S., & Bulchand-Gidumal, J. (2017). Information technology and front office employees’ performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(8), 2159-2177.

  • Mihhailova, G. (2009). Management challenges arising from the use of virtual work. Baltic Journal of Management, 4(1), 80-93.

  • Mihhailova, G., Oun, K., & Türk, K. (2011). Virtual work usage and challenges in different service sector branches. Baltic Journal of Management, 6(3), 342-356.

  • Morrison, R. L. (2008). Negative relationships in the workplace: Associations with organizational commitment, cohesion, job satisfaction and intention to turnover. Journal of Management & Organization, 14(4), 330-344.

  • Moser, K. S., & Axtell, C. M. (2013). The role of norms in virtual work. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(1), 1-6. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000079

  • Nielsen, T. M., Bachrach, D. G., Sundstrom, E., & Halfhill, T. R. (2012). Utility of OCB: Organizational citizenship behavior and group performance in a resource allocation framework. Journal of Management, 38(2), 668-694.

  • Pullan, P. (2016). Virtual leadership. Itnow, 58(3), 58-59.

  • Purnama, C. (2013). Influence analysis of organizational culture organizational commitment job and satisfaction organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) toward improved organizational performance. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(5), 86-100.

  • Raghuram, S., Garud, R., Wiesenfeld, B., & Gupta, V. (2001). Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment. Journal of Management, 27(3), 383-405.

  • Roy, S. R. (2012). Digital mastery: The skills needed for effective virtual leadership. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 8(3), 56-66.

  • Sahi, G. K., & Mahajan, R. (2014). Employees’ organizational commitment and its impact on their actual turnover behaviour through behavioural intentions. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 26(4), 621-646. doi:10.1108/APJML-01-2014-0015

  • Stranzl, J., Wolfgruber, D., Einwiller, S., & Brockhaus, J. (2021). Keeping up the spirit. Internal communication in an increasingly VWE (No. 13). Communication Insights. No. 13, Academic Society for Management & Communication, Leipzig.

  • Spurk, D., & Straub, C. (2020). Flexible employment relationships and careers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 103435.

  • Toniolo-Barrios, M., & Pitt, L. (2021). Mindfulness and the challenges of working from home in times of crisis. Business Horizons, 64(2), 189-197.

  • Turnipseed, D. L., & VandeWaa, E. A. (2020). The little engine that could: The impact of psychological empowerment on organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior, 23(4), 281-296.

  • Vahdat, S. (2021). The role of IT-based technologies on the management of human resources in the COVID-19 era. Kybernetes. Verburg, R. M., Bosch-Sijtsema, P., & Vartiainen, M. (2013). Getting it done: Critical success factors for project managers in virtual work settings. International Journal of Project Management, 31(1), 68-79.

  • Vigoda, E. (2000). Internal politics in public administration systems: An empirical examination of its relationship with job congruence, organizational citizenship behavior, and in-role performance. Public Personnel Management, 29(2), 185-210.

  • Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429-442.

  • Wessels, C., Schippers, M. C., Stegmann, S., Bakker, A. B., van Baalen, P. J., & Proper, K. I. (2019). Fostering flexibility in the new world of work: A model of time-spatial job crafting. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.

  • Xerri, M. J., & Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering innovative behaviour: The importance of employee commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163-3177.

  • Yang, Y. C. (2012). High-involvement human resource practices, affective commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The Service Industries Journal, 32(8), 1209-1227.

  • Zhong, Y., Li, Y., Ding, J., & Liao, Y. (2021). Risk management: Exploring emerging human resource issues during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(5), 228.


Abstract Views: 366

PDF Views: 0




  • Understanding Organisational Commitment and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour in Context of Work From Home Virtual Leadership During Covid-19 - Pandemic in India

Abstract Views: 366  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ashutosh Verma
Associate Professor, GNA University, Phagwara, Punjab, India

Abstract


The COVID-19 induced lockdown had forced the organisations to adopt work from home (WFH) , putting virtual leadership to test. The article aims to explore the employee’s ability to learn and adapt to a new work environment at home through organisational citizenship behaviour and organisational commitment influenced by virtual leadership. Organisational Commitment Scale (OCS) was used using the Likert scale (5 points) with virtual leadership contribution, and employee commitment as variables in conducting virtual duties. The findings revealed that the transformational leadership in the virtual work environment pattern shows that employee’s willingness, individually and in teams, require reward to influence behaviour. OCB was found to be task-based as active and passive leadership management coupled with charismatic leadership was found to influence change in employee behaviour, overcome challenges, and show allegiance to leadership inputs during virtual work processes and methods. The results indicated that commitment from employees is conditional in the work from home (WFH) context, while the role of leadership abilities to influence OCB is dependent on culture, willingness and readiness. It is backed by leadership coaching and training for easier employee transition towards a work environment that is an individual and team level commitment output shaped by forces of psychosocial needs.

Keywords


Organisational Commitment, Organisational Citizenship Behavior, Work from Home, Virtual Leadership

References