Journal of Organization and Human Behaviour

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Organisational Csr Practices: a Strategic Lever Towards Harnessing Higher Employee Engagement


Affiliations
1 AGM, Human Resource, TAFE Motors and Tractors Limited, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Employee engagement is a well-researched concept of human resource management and evolved as a key organisational strategic focus area. Many researchers have supported the vital role of employee engagement in achieving high-performance levels and superior business results for the organisation. In the present highly complex and fast-changing business environment, developing an actively engaged workforce is key to the survival and continuity of business enterprises. Corporate social responsibility (CSR), on the other hand, is rapidly changing from a mere set of corporate initiatives for fulfiling societal obligation. CSR presently revolves around concepts like corporate citizenship, corporate sustainability, strategic philanthropy, and doing business responsibly. Due to the dynamic behaviour and the multi-faceted association of organisations with society and its stakeholders, the nature of CSR is more complex. CSR has evolved as an essential tool in the direction of fostering an emotional and cognitive connection of the employees with the organisation, and deriving positive and sustainable organisational performance. This is more prominent, particularly for the younger employees. Organisational CSR initiatives positively impact employee engagement, which in turn can reduce costs due to increased employee retention as well as improved reputation in the eyes of employees. By integrating CSR and employee engagement into their business strategy, organisations can derive substantial benefits towards achieving positive and sustainable organisational performance. This paper explores the various dimensions of CSR in shaping employees’ attitudes and behaviour, and its connection with employee engagement towards superior organisational performance. It focuses on CSR as a significant contributing factor or lever towards harnessing employee engagement.

Keywords

CSR Practices, Employee CSR Perceptions, CSR Competence, Social/Environmental Sustainability, Employee Engagement
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Abraham, S. (2012). Job satisfaction as an antecedent to employee engagement. SIES Journal of Management, 8(2).

  • Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.

  • Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S., & Korschun, D. (2008). Using corporate social responsibility to win the war for talent. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 37-44.

  • Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719.

  • Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 19-46.

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research, and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.

  • Chaudhary, R. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Can CSR help in redressing the engagement gap? Social Responsibility Journal, 13(2), 323-338.

  • Chaudhri, V. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the communication imperative: Perspectives from CSR managers. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 419-442.

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can businesses afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70-76.

  • De Roeck, K., el Akremi, A., & Swaen, V. (2016). Consistency matters! How and when does corporate social responsibility affect employees’ organizational identification? Journal of Management Studies, 53(7), 1141-1168.

  • Degli Antoni, G., & Sacconi, L. (2013). Social responsibility, activism, and boycotting in a firm–stakeholders network of games with players’ conformist preferences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 45, 216-226.

  • Dhanesh, G. S. (2014). CSR as organization–employee relationship management strategy: A case study of socially responsible information technology companies in India. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(1), 130-149.

  • Dharmapala, D., & Khanna, V. (2018). The impact of mandated corporate social responsibility: Evidence from India’s Companies Act of 2013. International Review of Law and Economics, 56, 92-104.

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19.

  • El-Garaihy, W. H., Mobarak, A. K. M., & Albahussain, S. A. (2014). Measuring the impact of corporate social responsibility practices on competitive advantage: A mediation role of reputation and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 9(5), 109.

  • Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37-51.

  • Farrukh, M., Lee, J. W. C., Sajid, M., & Waheed, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial intentions: The role of individualism and collectivism in perspective of theory of planned behavior. Education and Training, 61(8), 984-1000.

  • Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54-61.

  • Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 1-21.

  • Ghosh, D., & Gurunathan, L. (2014). Linking perceived corporate social responsibility and intention to quit: The mediating role of job embeddedness. Vision, 18(3), 175-183.

  • Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 796.

  • Greenwood, M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 315-327.

  • Gupta, N., & Sharma, V. (2016). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee engagement and its linkage to organizational performance: A conceptual model. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(3), 59-75.

  • Hakanen, J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495-513.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.

  • Kahn, W. A. (1992). To be full there: Psychological presence at work. Human Relations, 45, 321-349.

  • Kataria, A., Kataria, A., & Garg, R. (2013). Effective internal communication: A way towards sustainability. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation, 6(2).

  • Lin, C. P., Baruch, Y., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and team performance: The mediating role of team efficacy and team self-esteem. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 167-180.

  • Lin, C. P., Lyau, N. M., Tsai, Y. H., Chen, W. Y., & Chiu, C. K. (2010). Modeling corporate citizenship and its relationship with organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 357-372.

  • Lin, C.-P., & Liu, M.-L. (2017). Examining the effects of corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership on turnover intention. Personnel Review, 46(3), 526-550.

  • Llorens, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). Testing the robustness of the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 378-391.

  • Low, M. P. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the evolution of internal corporate social responsibility in 21st century. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 3(1), 56-74.

  • Manchiraju, H., & Rajgopal, S. (2017). Does corporate social responsibility (CSR) create shareholder value? Evidence from the Indian Companies Act 2013. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(5), 1257-1300.

  • Markos, S., & Sridevi, M. S. (2010). Employee engagement: The key to improving performance. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(12), 89.

  • Opoku-Dakwa, A., Chen, C. C., & Rupp, D. E. (2018). CSR initiative characteristics and employee engagement: An impact-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 580-593.

  • Osagie, E. R., Wesselink, R., Blok, V., Lans, T., & Mulder, M. (2016). Individual competencies for corporate social responsibility: A literature and practice perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 233-252.

  • Osagie, E. R., Wesselink, R., Runhaar, P., & Mulder, M. (2018). Unraveling the competence development of corporate social responsibility leaders: The importance of peer learning, learning goal orientation, and learning climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(4), 891-906.

  • Peng, L. M. (2014). Internal corporate social responsibility: An overview. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(16), 18-29.

  • Peterson, D. K. (2004). The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business & Society, 43(3), 296-319.

  • Pinkston, T. S., & Carroll, A. B. (1994). Corporate citizenship perspectives and foreign direct investment in the US. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(3), 157-169.

  • Plewa, C., Conduit, J., Quester, P., & Johnson, C. (2015). The impact of corporate volunteering on CSR image: A consumer perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 643-659.

  • Pohle, G., & Hittner, J. (2008). Attaining sustainable growth through corporate social responsibility: IBM institute for business value. White Paper, 20.

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.

  • Powell, S. M., Davies, M. A. P., & Norton, D. (2013). Impact of organizational climate on ethical empowerment and engagement with corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Brand Management, 20(9), 815-839.

  • Rangan, K., Chase, L., & Karim, S. (2015). The truth about CSR. Harvard Business Review, 93(1/2), 40-49.

  • Rupp, D. E., Shao, R., Skarlicki, D. P., Paddock, E. L., Kim, T., & Nadisic, T. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: The moderating role of CSR-specific relative autonomy and individualism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(5), 559-579.

  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619.

  • Santhosh, M., & Baral, R. (2015). A conceptual framework for exploring the impacts of corporate social responsibility on employee attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Human Values, 21(2), 127-136.

  • Schaufeli, W., & Salanova, M. (2007). Work engagement. Managing Social and Ethical Issues in Organizations, 135, 177.

  • Sekar, S., & Dyaram, L. (2017). What drives employees to participate in corporate volunteering programs?” Social Responsibility Journal, 13(4), 661-677.

  • Sharma, E., & Tewari, R. (2018). Engaging employee perception for effective corporate social responsibility: Role of human resource professionals. Global Business Review, 19(1), 111-130.

  • Soni, D., & Mehta, P. (2018). Employee engagement in corporate social responsibility (CSR): Reflection from Indian banking sector. Journal of Strategic Human Resource Management, 7(2), 40-47.

  • Staniškienė, E., & Stankevičiūtė, Ž. (2018). Social sustainability measurement framework: The case of employee perspective in a CSR-committed organisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 708-719.

  • Supanti, D., Butcher, K., & Fredline, L. (2015). Enhancing the employer-employee relationship through corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(7), 1479-1498.

  • Taneja, S., Sewell, S. S., & Odom, R. Y. (2015). A culture of employee engagement: A strategic perspective for global managers. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(3), 46-56.

  • Tian, Q., & Robertson, J. L. (2019). How and when does perceived CSR affect employees’ engagement in voluntary pro-environmental behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 155(2), 399-412.

  • Turker, D. (2009). How corporate social responsibility influences organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(2), 189.

  • Valentin, M. A., Valentin, C. C., & Nafukho, F. M. (2015). The engagement continuum model using corporate social responsibility as an intervention for sustained employee engagement research leading practice. European Journal of Training & Development, 39(3), 182-202.

  • Wesselink, R., Blok, V., van Leur, S., Lans, T., & Dentoni, D. (2015). Individual competencies for managers engaged in corporate sustainable management practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 497-506.

  • Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3), 229-267.

  • Zhou, Z., Luo, B. N., & Tang, T. L. P. (2018). Corporate social responsibility excites ‘exponential’ positive employee engagement: The Matthew effect in CSR and sustainable policy. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 339-354.


Abstract Views: 338

PDF Views: 0




  • Organisational Csr Practices: a Strategic Lever Towards Harnessing Higher Employee Engagement

Abstract Views: 338  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Partha Sarathi Basu
AGM, Human Resource, TAFE Motors and Tractors Limited, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Abstract


Employee engagement is a well-researched concept of human resource management and evolved as a key organisational strategic focus area. Many researchers have supported the vital role of employee engagement in achieving high-performance levels and superior business results for the organisation. In the present highly complex and fast-changing business environment, developing an actively engaged workforce is key to the survival and continuity of business enterprises. Corporate social responsibility (CSR), on the other hand, is rapidly changing from a mere set of corporate initiatives for fulfiling societal obligation. CSR presently revolves around concepts like corporate citizenship, corporate sustainability, strategic philanthropy, and doing business responsibly. Due to the dynamic behaviour and the multi-faceted association of organisations with society and its stakeholders, the nature of CSR is more complex. CSR has evolved as an essential tool in the direction of fostering an emotional and cognitive connection of the employees with the organisation, and deriving positive and sustainable organisational performance. This is more prominent, particularly for the younger employees. Organisational CSR initiatives positively impact employee engagement, which in turn can reduce costs due to increased employee retention as well as improved reputation in the eyes of employees. By integrating CSR and employee engagement into their business strategy, organisations can derive substantial benefits towards achieving positive and sustainable organisational performance. This paper explores the various dimensions of CSR in shaping employees’ attitudes and behaviour, and its connection with employee engagement towards superior organisational performance. It focuses on CSR as a significant contributing factor or lever towards harnessing employee engagement.

Keywords


CSR Practices, Employee CSR Perceptions, CSR Competence, Social/Environmental Sustainability, Employee Engagement

References