Food Science Research Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Development and Quality Evaluation of Meat Balls from Turkey Meat


Affiliations
1 Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Department of Livestock Products Technology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tirunelveli (T.N.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A study was conducted to develop and assess the quality and acceptability of meat balls from turkey meat (Meleagris gallopavo). Meat balls prepared from broiler chicken meat were used as control. Significantly (P<0.05) higher pH, product yield (%), moisture retention (%), moisture (%), protein (%) and fat (%) were observed in turkey meat balls. The product shrinkage (%) was non-significantly higher in broiler chicken meat balls as compared to turkey meat balls. No significant differences were observed in microbial counts between the broiler chicken meat and turkey meat balls. Physico-chemical parameters of turkey meat balls were comparable with broiler chicken meat balls. Sensory evaluation scores results indicated that meat balls prepared from turkey were rated “very palatable” and were comparable with meat balls prepared from broiler chicken meat. Therefore, it can be concluded that, turkey meat can be successfully used for preparation of meat balls of acceptable quality.

Keywords

Turkey, Broiler, Chicken, Meat, Balls, Quality, Acceptability
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Anna Anandh, M. (2018). Quality and acceptability of turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) meat cutlets. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 13 : 54 – 58.

  • Anna Anandh, M., Sutha, M. and Sobana, A.S. (2019).Quality and acceptability of pickle from chicken and turkey gizzards. Asian J. Dairy Food Res., 38 : 155 -158.

  • AOAC (1995)Official methods of analysis (16thEd.). Association of Official AnalyticalChemists. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

  • APHA (1984). In M. L. Speck (Ed.): Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods (2nd Ed.). American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

  • Castro , F.M.M., Morgano, M.A., Nascimento de Queiroza, S.C. and Mantovani, D.M.B. (2000). Relationships of the minerals and fatty acid contents in processed turkey meat products. J. Food Chem., 69 : 259-265.

  • Chettri, A., Kulkari, R.C., Mahapatra, C.M. and Kumar, P. (2011). Effect of different cooking methods on the quality of soya incorporated turkey meat balls. Indian J. Poult. Sci., 46 : 361 - 364.

  • El-Magoli, S.B., Laroia, S. and Hansen, P.M.T. (1996). Flavour and texture characteristics of low fat ground beef patties formulated with whey protein concentrate. Meat Sci.,42: 179 –193.

  • Halini, N., Aripin, M. and Huda, N. (2018). Quality characteristics of meat balls prepared from different ratio of chicken and duck meat. Asia Pacific J. Sust. Agric. Food & Ener.,6: 6- 9.

  • Huda, N., Ismail, N., Shen, Y. H. and Huey, Y. L. (2007). Chemical composition, colour and textural properties of commercial chicken balls. 12th Asian Chemical Congress, Kuala Lumpur 23-25 August 2007.

  • Jay, J.M., Loessner, M.J. and Golden, D.A. (2005). Modern food microbiology. 7 th Edition. Springer, Inc, United State of America.

  • Keeton, J.C. (1983). Effect of fat and Nacl/phosphate levels on the chemical and sensory properties of pork patties. J. Food Sci., 48 : 878–881.

  • Serdaroglu, M. (2006). Improving low fat meatball characteristics by adding whey powder. J. Meat Sci.,72 : 155-163.

  • Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical methods. 8th Edn. Oxford and IBH Publ. Co, Calcutta, W.B. (India).

  • Trout, E.S., Hunt, M.C., Johnson, D.E., Claus, J.R., Kastner, C.L. and Kropf, D.H. (1992). Characteristics in low-fat ground beef containing texture modifying ingredients. J. Food Sci., 57: 19–24.

  • Xargayo, M. and Lagares, J. (1992).Computerized massaging of meat. Fleishwirtschaft, 4 : 2.


Abstract Views: 648

PDF Views: 0




  • Development and Quality Evaluation of Meat Balls from Turkey Meat

Abstract Views: 648  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

M. Anna Anandh
Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Department of Livestock Products Technology, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tirunelveli (T.N.), India

Abstract


A study was conducted to develop and assess the quality and acceptability of meat balls from turkey meat (Meleagris gallopavo). Meat balls prepared from broiler chicken meat were used as control. Significantly (P<0.05) higher pH, product yield (%), moisture retention (%), moisture (%), protein (%) and fat (%) were observed in turkey meat balls. The product shrinkage (%) was non-significantly higher in broiler chicken meat balls as compared to turkey meat balls. No significant differences were observed in microbial counts between the broiler chicken meat and turkey meat balls. Physico-chemical parameters of turkey meat balls were comparable with broiler chicken meat balls. Sensory evaluation scores results indicated that meat balls prepared from turkey were rated “very palatable” and were comparable with meat balls prepared from broiler chicken meat. Therefore, it can be concluded that, turkey meat can be successfully used for preparation of meat balls of acceptable quality.

Keywords


Turkey, Broiler, Chicken, Meat, Balls, Quality, Acceptability

References