International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Brand Health and Campaign Evaluation: A Case Study in India


Affiliations
1 EPGPM (Marketing & Sales Management), Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
2 Professor & Head, Department of Executive Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The research activity was carried out to analyse brand salience, trial, imagery, and disposition, and to evaluate campaign efficacy, along with competitive advantage in terms of registration and effectiveness of media vehicles. The data gathered for the research activity are the primary sources legitimately gathered from the general population using random sampling method among the target group mentioned. The quantity of respondents for the study is 50. The research design carried out for the investigation is quantitative in nature. For the structured questionnaire, a five-point Likert scale was used. In this study, it was discovered that a majority of the respondents are aware of Dove body soap brand. From the thorough analysis and interpretation of the data collected, it can be concluded that Dove is a noteworthy brand, in terms of mind share, among the respondents. It was discovered that a larger part of the respondents are happy with the brand and intend to continue using the same. From the media vehicle efficacy testing, it was found that TV has immerged as the most important media vehicle for the primary source of awareness. In terms of communication evaluation, it was found that a majority of the respondents have seen the communication pertaining to Dove, and the top box score for likeability, uniqueness, believability, persuasiveness are higher than the competing brands and in favour of Dove body soap.

Keywords

Brand Salience, Brand Imagery, Media Vehicle, Communication Evaluation, Likeability, Uniqueness, Believability, Persuasiveness, Body Soap, Kolkata
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aaker, D. A. (1991a). Are brand equity investments really worthwhile? Admap, 14-17.

  • Aaker, D. A. (1991b). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York: The Free Press.

  • Aaker, D. A. (1992). The value of brand equity. Journal of Business Strategy, 13(4), 27-32.

  • Bahn, K. D. (1986). How and when do brand perceptions and preferences first form? A cognitive developmental investigation. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(3).

  • Brown, S. P., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 141-148.

  • Clark, C. R., Doraszelski, U., & Draganska, M. (2009).The effect of advertising on brand awareness and perceived quality: An empirical investigation using panel data. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 7(2), 207236. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11129-009-9066-z

  • Conradie, E. S., Roberts-Lombard, M., & Klopper, H. B.(2012). The influence of eleven p’s of internal marketing on brand awareness: An emerging economy perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(1).

  • Dickson, P. R., & Sawyer, A. G. (1986). Point-of-purchase behaviour and price perceptions of supermarket shoppers. Marketing Science Institute: Cambridge, MA: MSI.

  • Hakala, U., Vincze, Z., & Svensson, J. (2012, June).Consumer-based brand equity and top-of-mind awareness: A cross-country analysis.

  • Hess, A. C. (2014). Pink or blue? The impact of gender cues on brand perceptions. European Journal of Marketing, 50(9/10), 1550-1574.

  • Holden, S. J. S. (1993). Understanding brand awareness: Let me give you a C(l)ue!. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 383-388.

  • Holden, S. J. S., & Lutz, R. J. (1992). Ask not what the brand can evoke; ask what can evoke the brand. Advances in Consumer Research, 19, 101-107.

  • Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York: Wiley.

  • Hoyer, W. D. (1984). An examination of consumer decision making for a common repeat purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 822-829.

  • Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 141-148.

  • Huang, R., & Sarigöllü, E. (2014). How brand awareness relates to market outcome, brand equity, and the marketing mix. Journal of Business Research, 65.

  • Humphreys, M. S., Cornwell, T. B., Weeks, C. S., Maguire, A. M., & Tellegen, C. L. (2006). Sponsorship-linked marketing: The role of articulation in memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 312-321.

  • Jacoby, J., Szybillo, G., & Busato-Schach, J. (1977).

  • Information acquisition behaviour in brand choice situations. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(4), 209-216.

  • Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1-22.

  • Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 595-600.

  • Kelly, P. (1991). Advertising research and decision making. Proceedings of the Australasian Marketing Educators’ Conference. University of South Australia: Adelaide.

  • Kirmani, A. (1990). The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 160-171.

  • Laurent, G., Lambert-Pandraud, R., Yoon, C., & Mullet, E. (2017). Impact of age on brand awareness sets: A turning point in consumers’ early 60s. Marketing Letter, 28(2).

  • Liu, H.-W., & Huang, H.-C. (2014). Trade-off between push and pull strategy: The moderating role of brand awareness. Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 65-74.

  • Macdonald, E. K., & Sharp, B. M. (2000). Brand awareness effects on consumer decision making for a common, repeat purchase product: A replication. Journal of Business Research, 48(1), 5-15.

  • Mackay, H. (1990, November). Australian community attitudes towards the subject of alcohol advertising. Mackay Research Research Report.

  • Molinillo, S. (2016, April 13). Responsible brands vs. active brands?

  • Narayana, L. L., & Markin, R. T. (1975). Consumer behaviour and product performance: An alternative conceptualization. Journal of Marketing, 39, 1-6.

  • Nedungadi, P. (1990). Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 263-276.

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.

  • Romaniuk, J. (2016, June 30.). Revisiting an old metric for a new world, brand awareness is a pivotal, but often neglected, aspect of consumer-based brand equity.

  • Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35, 56-61.

  • Rossiter, J. R. (1993). Brand awareness and acceptance: A seven-set classification for managers. Journal of Brand Management, 1, 33-40.

  • Rossiter, J. R., & Percy, L. (1987). Advertising and promotion management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

  • Rossiter, J. R., Percy, L., & Donovan, R. J. (1991). A better advertising planning grid. Journal of Advertising Research, 11-21.

  • Sasmita, J. (2005). Effects of brand association, brand loyalty, brand awareness, and brand image. Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(3), 276-292.

  • Stokes, R. C. (1985). The effects of price, package design, and brand familiarity on perceived quality. In Jacoby, J. & J. Olson (Eds.), Perceived Quality. Lexington: Lexington Books.

  • Wilson, C. E. (1981). A procedure for the analysis of consumer decision making. Journal of Advertising Research, 21, 31-38.

  • Woodside, A. G., & Wilson, E. J. (1985). Effects of consumer awareness of advertising on preference. Journal of Advertising Research, 25, 41-48.


Abstract Views: 144

PDF Views: 0




  • Brand Health and Campaign Evaluation: A Case Study in India

Abstract Views: 144  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Saikat Chakraborty
EPGPM (Marketing & Sales Management), Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Sarbani Mitra
Professor & Head, Department of Executive Management, Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management, Kolkata, West Bengal, India

Abstract


The research activity was carried out to analyse brand salience, trial, imagery, and disposition, and to evaluate campaign efficacy, along with competitive advantage in terms of registration and effectiveness of media vehicles. The data gathered for the research activity are the primary sources legitimately gathered from the general population using random sampling method among the target group mentioned. The quantity of respondents for the study is 50. The research design carried out for the investigation is quantitative in nature. For the structured questionnaire, a five-point Likert scale was used. In this study, it was discovered that a majority of the respondents are aware of Dove body soap brand. From the thorough analysis and interpretation of the data collected, it can be concluded that Dove is a noteworthy brand, in terms of mind share, among the respondents. It was discovered that a larger part of the respondents are happy with the brand and intend to continue using the same. From the media vehicle efficacy testing, it was found that TV has immerged as the most important media vehicle for the primary source of awareness. In terms of communication evaluation, it was found that a majority of the respondents have seen the communication pertaining to Dove, and the top box score for likeability, uniqueness, believability, persuasiveness are higher than the competing brands and in favour of Dove body soap.

Keywords


Brand Salience, Brand Imagery, Media Vehicle, Communication Evaluation, Likeability, Uniqueness, Believability, Persuasiveness, Body Soap, Kolkata

References