International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Analyzing Computer Mediated Buyer-seller Negotiations: An Application of Social Presence Theory


Affiliations
1 Department of Marketing, School of Business, Howard University.
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The relative effectiveness of three communications media is examined by applying social presence theory. The three media: Face-To-Face Interaction (FTF), Instant Messaging (IM), and Email (EM) - are conceptualized to have different levels of social presence. Their impact on the buyer-seller negotiation processes, such as problem solving bargaining strategies, and negotiation outcomes, such as negotiation time, joint profit, and joint satisfaction were examined using negotiation simulations conducted in FTF, IM, and EM conditions. Participants completed questionnaires after negotiating in one of the three conditions. The central finding of the study is that higher social presence in the individualistically conditioned negotiation simulations caused more time spent, and lower joint satisfaction for negotiators.

Keywords

Social Presence Theory, Computer Mediated Communications, Partial least Squares
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, pp. 693-716.

  • Arunachalam, V., & Dilla, W. N. (1995). Judgment Accuracy and Outcomes in Negotiation - a Causal- Modeling Analysis of Decision-Aiding Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(3), pp. 289-304.

  • Barry, B., & Fulmer, I. S. (2004). The Medium and the message: the adaptive use of communication media in dyadic infl uence. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), pp. 272.

  • Barsness, Z., & Tenbrunsel, A. (1998, June). Technologically mediated communication and negotiation: Do relationships matter? Paper presented at the Paper presented at the International association for Confl ict Management conference, College Park, MD.

  • Carnevale, P. J. D., & Isen, A. M. (1986). The Infl uence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37(1), pp. 1-13.

  • Carnevale, P. J. D., Pruitt, D. G., & Seilheimer, S. D. (1981). Looking and Competing - Accountability and Visual Access in Integrative Bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), pp. 111- 120.

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(6), pp. 893.

  • Clopton, S. W. (1984). Seller and Buying Firm Factors Affecting Industrial Buyers’ Negotiation Behavior and Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 21(1), pp. 39-53.

  • Cron, W. L., Gilly, M. C., Graham, J. L., & Slocum Jr, J. W. (2009). Gender differences in the pricing of professional services: Implications for income and customerrelationships. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), pp. 93-105.

  • Croson, R. T. A. (1999). Look at Me When You Say That: An Electronic Negotiation Simulation. Simulation & Gaming, pp. 30, 23.

  • Curhan, J. R., Neale, M. A., Ross, L., & Rosencranz- Engelmann, J. (2008). Relational accommodation in negotiation: Effects of egalitarianism and gender on economic effi ciency and relational capital. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(2), pp. 192-205.

  • Gelfand, M. J., Major, V. S., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L. H., & O’Brien, K. (2006). Negotiating relationally: The dynamics of the relational self in negotiations. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), pp. 427-451.

  • Goleman, D. (2006). Emotional intelligence: ; why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam.

  • Graham, J. L. (1986). The Problem-Solving Approach to Negotiations in Industrial Marketing. Journal of Business Research, 14(6), pp. 549-566.

  • Gump, B. B., & Kulik, J. A. (1997). Stress, affi liation, and emotional contagion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), pp. 305.

  • Gupta, S. (1989). Modeling Integrative, Multiple Issue Bargaining. Management Science, 35(7), pp. 788-806.

  • Johnson, N. A., & Cooper, R. B. (2009). Media, affect, concession, and agreement in negotiation: IM versus telephone. Decision Support Systems, 46(3), pp. 673-684.

  • Kelley, H. H. (1966). A classroom study of the dillemas in interpersonal negotiations. In K. Archibald (Ed.), Strategic Interaction and Confl ict. Berkeley, CA: Institute of Internatinal Studies, UC Berkeley.

  • Lee, J. Y. H., & Panteli, N. (2010). Business strategic confl ict in computer-mediated communication. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), pp. 196-208.

  • Lewis, S. A., & Fry, W. R. (1977). Effects of Visual Access and Orientation on Discovery of Integrative Bargaining Alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(1), pp. 75-92.

  • Loewenstein, J., Morris, M. W., Chakravarti, A., Thompson, L., & Kopelman, S. (2005). At a loss for words: Dominating the conversation and the outcome in negotiation as a function of intricate arguments and communication media. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 98(1), pp. 28-38.

  • Moore, D. A., Kurtzberg, T. R., Thompson, L. L., & Morris, M. W. (1999). Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiations: Group affi liations and good vibrations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77(1), pp. 22-43.

  • Neale, M. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (1991). Cognition and rationality in negotiation. New York Toronto: Free Press.

  • Neu, J., & Graham, J. L. (1994). A New Methodological Approach to the Study of Interpersonal Infl uence Tactics - a Test Drive of a Behavioral Scheme. Journal of Business Research, 29(2), pp. 131-144.

  • Norton, M. I., Frost, J. H., & Ariely, D. (2007). Less is more: the lure of ambiguity, or why familiarity breeds contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), pp. 97.

  • Pruitt, D. G., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Development of integrative solution in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(4), pp. 612- 633.

  • Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social confl ict: escalation, stalemate, and settlement (1st ed.). New York: Random House.

  • Purdy, J. M., Nye, P., & Balakrishnan, P. V. (2000). The impact of communication media on negotiation outcomes. International Journal of Confl ict Management, 11(2), pp. 162-187.

  • Putnam, L., & Roloff, M. E. (1992). Communication and negotiation. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.

  • Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Belknap Press.

  • Rangaswamy, A., & Shell, G. R. (1997). Using computers to realize joint gains in negotiations: Toward an "electronic bargaining table". Management Science, 43(8),pp. 1147-1163.

  • Reinsch, N. L., Turner, J. W., & Tinsley, C. H. (2008). Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come?. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), pp. 391-403.

  • Sheffi eld, J. (1995). The Effect of Communication Medium on Negotiation Performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4(2), pp. 159-179.

  • Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London; New York: Wiley.

  • Tickle-Degnen, L., & Rosenthal, R. (1990). The nature of rapport and its nonverbal correlates. Psychological inquiry, 1(4), pp. 285-293.

  • Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations : an analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Wilson, J.M., Straus, S.G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 99, pp. 16-33


Abstract Views: 434

PDF Views: 0




  • Analyzing Computer Mediated Buyer-seller Negotiations: An Application of Social Presence Theory

Abstract Views: 434  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Guang Yang
Department of Marketing, School of Business, Howard University.

Abstract


The relative effectiveness of three communications media is examined by applying social presence theory. The three media: Face-To-Face Interaction (FTF), Instant Messaging (IM), and Email (EM) - are conceptualized to have different levels of social presence. Their impact on the buyer-seller negotiation processes, such as problem solving bargaining strategies, and negotiation outcomes, such as negotiation time, joint profit, and joint satisfaction were examined using negotiation simulations conducted in FTF, IM, and EM conditions. Participants completed questionnaires after negotiating in one of the three conditions. The central finding of the study is that higher social presence in the individualistically conditioned negotiation simulations caused more time spent, and lower joint satisfaction for negotiators.

Keywords


Social Presence Theory, Computer Mediated Communications, Partial least Squares

References