Indian Journal of Marketing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Trends in Electronic Word of Mouth Research : A Bibliometric Review and Analysis


Affiliations
1 PhD Research Scholar, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Village Lavale, Taluka, Mulshi Rd, Pune - 412 115, Maharashtra and Assistant Professor, Dr. V.N. Bedekar Institute of Management Studies, Building No. 4, Jnanadweep, Chendani Bunder Road, Thane (W) - 400 601, Maharashtra, India
2 Professor, Symbiosis Institute of Digital and Telecom Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Village Lavale, Taluka, Mulshi Rd, Pune - 412 115, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This aim of this paper was to evaluate the research literature on electronic word of mouth (EWOM) by conducting a bibliometric analysis of research papers in the Scopus database both from a global as well as an Indian perspective. The bibliometric review and analysis were carried out using the analytical tools of the Scopus database and Biblioshiny – the shiny interface of the bibliometric tool Bibliometrix. The research literature was investigated over a period of 10 years (2009 – 2019) and analyzed trends in production of research papers, citation trends, top countries, journals, and authors contributing to literature related to EWOM. USA was the topmost contributing country based on the number of publications and citations received. We observed that significant research on EWOM has been conducted in the Asian subcontinent by China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. The key theories used in researching the domain of electronic word of mouth included the cognitive dissonance theory, the information adoption model, elaboration likelihood model, attribution theory, and the social exchange theory. The intellectual structure of the research on electronic word of mouth was studied in order to offer fundamental insights into recent developments in this research area, which would provide researchers and academicians with a broad guideline for conducting further research in this area.

Keywords

Word of Mouth, Electronic Word of Mouth, EWOM, Bibliometric Analysis, Bibliometrix, Biblioshiny, Citation Analysis, Literature Review.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alabdullatif, A. A., & Akram, M. S. (2018). Exploring the impact of electronic word of mouth and property characteristics on customers’ online booking decision. TEM Journal, 7(2), 411–420. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=664769

  • Alsaggaf, M. A., & Althonayan, A. (2018). An empirical investigation of customer intentions influenced by service quality using the mediation of emotional and cognitive responses. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(1), 194–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2017-0048

  • Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

  • Arora, T., Agarwal, B., & Kumar, A. (2018). A study of millennials’ preferences for social media advertising in Delhi NCR. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(10), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i10/132334

  • Awad, N. F., & Ragowsky, A. (2008). Establishing trust in electronic commerce through online word of mouth : An examination across genders. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240404

  • Bhāle, S., & Tongare, K. (2018). A conceptual model of helpfulness of online reviews in a blink. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i2/121331

  • Chatterjee, P. (2001). Online reviews : Do consumers use them ? SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=900158

  • Chen, C. - W., Chen, W. - C., & Chen, W. - K. (2014). Understanding the effects of eWOM on cosmetic consumer behavioral intention. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 5(1), 97–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.7903/ijecs.1030

  • Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication : A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008

  • Cheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth : Informational and normative determinants of online consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic

  • Commerce, 13(4), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415130402

  • Chiou, J. - S., Hsiao, C. - C., & Chiu, T. - Y. (2018). The credibility and attribution of online reviews : Differences between high and low product knowledge consumers. Online Information Review, 42(5), 630–646. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2017-0197

  • Chu, S. - C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-30 1-047-075

  • Churchill, E., Girgensohn, A., Nelson, L., & Lee, A. (2004). Blending digital and physical spaces for ubiquitous community participation. Communications of the ACM, 47(2), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.1145/966389.966413

  • Duan, W., Gu, B., & Whinston, A. B. (2008). Do online reviews matter ?–An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1007–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.001

  • Dwyer, P. (2007). Measuring the value of electronic word of mouth and its impact in consumer communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20078

  • Erkan, I., & Evans, C. (2016). The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers’ purchase intentions : An extended approach to information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.003

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.

  • Folkes, V. S. (1988). Recent attribution research in consumer behavior : A review and new directions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 548–565.

  • Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM : The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.10.004

  • Hall, C. M. (2011). Publish and perish ? Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism. Tourism Management, 32(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001

  • Harrison - Walker, L. J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 4(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050141006

  • Helm, S. (2000). Viral marketing - establishing customer relationships by ‘word-of-mouse'. Electronic Markets, 10(3), 158–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10196780050177053

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumeropinion platforms : What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet ? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Malthouse, E. C., Friege, C., Gensler, S., Lobschat, L., Rangaswamy, A., & Skiera, B. (2010). The impact of new media on customer relationships. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375460

  • Ho, Y. - S. (2008). Bibliometric analysis of biosorption technology in water treatment research from 1991 to 2004. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 34(1-4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEP.2008.020778

  • Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355

  • Hussain, S., Guangju, W., Jafar, R. M. S., Ilyas, Z., Mustafa, G., & Jianzhou, Y. (2018). Consumers' online information adoption behavior : Motives and antecedents of electronic word of mouth communications. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.09.019

  • Ifie, K., Simintiras, A. C., Dwivedi, Y., & Mavridou, V. (2018). How service quality and outcome confidence drive preoutcome word-of-mouth. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 44, 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.07.002

  • India Brand Equity Foundation. (2019a.). E-commerce report. https://www.ibef.org/download/E-Commerce-July 2019.pdf

  • India Brand Equity Foundation. (2019b.). Retail report. https://www.ibef.org/download/Retail-July-2019.pdf

  • Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power : Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21149

  • Kang, B., & Sivadas, E. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and word-of-mouth intentions. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(4), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i4/122622

  • Khammash, M., & Griffiths, G. H. (2011). ‘Arrivederci CIAO. com, Buongiorno Bing. com’–Electronic word-ofmouth (eWOM), antecedences and consequences. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.005

  • Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) : How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 28 (3), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0265048709200709

  • Lindsey, D. (1980). Production and citation measures in the sociology of science : The problem of multiple authorship. Social Studies of Science, 10(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631278001000202

  • Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pan, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tourism Management, 29(3), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.011

  • Mangold, W. G., & Smith, K. T. (2012). Selling to millennials with online reviews. Business Horizons, 55(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.11.001

  • Moriarty, J., Jones, R., Rowley, J., & Kupiec-Teahan, B. (2008). Marketing in small hotels : A qualitative study.

  • Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 26(3), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500810871348

  • O’Cass, A., & Carlson, J. (2012). An e-retailing assessment of perceived website-service innovativeness : Implications for website quality evaluations, trust, loyalty and word of mouth. Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ), 20(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ausmj.2011.10.012

  • Osareh, F. (1996). Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: A review of literature I. Libri, 46(3), 149 –158. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1996.46.3.149

  • Park, C., & Lee, T. M. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect : A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.017

  • Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka, A. (2006). The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces : Implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 392–414. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0106

  • Prasad, S., & Sen, S. (2018). Role of conviction in the impact of electronic word of mouth on purchase intention for financial products and services. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i1/120735

  • Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.

  • Rao, K. S., & Rao, B. (2019). Examining eWOM credibility - Consumer purchase intention relationship in Facebook : A mediation analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(8), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i8/146169

  • Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015). A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis : Tasks, approaches and applications. Knowledge-Based Systems, 89, 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015

  • Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185

  • Shimpi, S. S. (2018). Social media as an effective marketing tool : An empirical study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(7), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i7/129725

  • Sparks, B. A., & Browning, V. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1310–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011

  • Sussman, S. W., & Siegal, W. S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations : An integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.47.14767

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence - informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

  • Ullah, N., Ranjha, M. H., & Rehan, M. (2018). The impact of after sale service and service quality on word of mouth, mediating role of customer satisfaction. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 31(4), 494–512. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2018.096170

  • Vermeulen, I. E., & Seegers, D. (2009). Tried and tested : The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tourism Management, 30(1), 123 –127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.04.008

  • Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 258–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378702400302

  • Ye, Q., Law, R., Gu, B., & Chen, W. (2011). The influence of user-generated content on traveller behavior : An empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 634–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.04.014

  • Yoo, C. W., Sanders, G. L., & Moon, J. (2013). Exploring the effect of e-WOM participation on e-Loyalty in e-commerce. Decision Support Systems, 55(3), 669–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.02.001

  • Yusuf, A. S., Che Hussin, A. R., & Busalim, A. H. (2018). Influence of e-WOM engagement on consumer purchase intention in social commerce. Journal of Services Marketing, 32(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-01-2017-0031

  • Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224299606000203


Abstract Views: 439

PDF Views: 2




  • Trends in Electronic Word of Mouth Research : A Bibliometric Review and Analysis

Abstract Views: 439  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Kala Mahadevan
PhD Research Scholar, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Village Lavale, Taluka, Mulshi Rd, Pune - 412 115, Maharashtra and Assistant Professor, Dr. V.N. Bedekar Institute of Management Studies, Building No. 4, Jnanadweep, Chendani Bunder Road, Thane (W) - 400 601, Maharashtra, India
Sujata Joshi
Professor, Symbiosis Institute of Digital and Telecom Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Village Lavale, Taluka, Mulshi Rd, Pune - 412 115, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


This aim of this paper was to evaluate the research literature on electronic word of mouth (EWOM) by conducting a bibliometric analysis of research papers in the Scopus database both from a global as well as an Indian perspective. The bibliometric review and analysis were carried out using the analytical tools of the Scopus database and Biblioshiny – the shiny interface of the bibliometric tool Bibliometrix. The research literature was investigated over a period of 10 years (2009 – 2019) and analyzed trends in production of research papers, citation trends, top countries, journals, and authors contributing to literature related to EWOM. USA was the topmost contributing country based on the number of publications and citations received. We observed that significant research on EWOM has been conducted in the Asian subcontinent by China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong. The key theories used in researching the domain of electronic word of mouth included the cognitive dissonance theory, the information adoption model, elaboration likelihood model, attribution theory, and the social exchange theory. The intellectual structure of the research on electronic word of mouth was studied in order to offer fundamental insights into recent developments in this research area, which would provide researchers and academicians with a broad guideline for conducting further research in this area.

Keywords


Word of Mouth, Electronic Word of Mouth, EWOM, Bibliometric Analysis, Bibliometrix, Biblioshiny, Citation Analysis, Literature Review.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom%2F2021%2Fv51%2Fi4%2F158468