Indian Journal of Marketing

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Exploring the Plausibility of Pre-Purchase Decision Process in User Acceptance of Smart Wearable Technology Devices


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, 19, Institutional Area, Knowledge Park II, Greater Noida - 201 306, Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Assistant Professor, School of Business & Management, Christ (Deemed to be) University, Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560 029, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The market for smart wearable technology products is growing rapidly. Although wearable technology is still in its early stages, a longer-term outlook is required. This study inspected the existence of consumers’ pre-purchase stage for smart wearable technology devices. It further analyzed the factors that influenced customers’ decisions in the pre-purchase phase. The methodology adopted was quantitative, using which 240 users of smart wearables were given a structured questionnaire to fill up. The Smart PLS 3.0 software was used for structural equation modeling and path analysis. The results indicated that customers go through a pre-purchase decision journey. Their decisions are influenced by individual characteristics, product description, information source utility, data usefulness, trust, visibility of the product, and demonstrability. Together, these factors resulted in the customers’ successful transition from the pre-purchase stage to the purchase decision stage.

Keywords

Pre-Purchase Decision Process, Need Recognition, Information Search, Evaluation of Alternatives, Smart Technology Wearables (SWT), Consumer Behavior, Purchase Intention.

Paper Submission Date : May 10, 2021 ; Paper Sent Back for Revision : July 8, 2021 ; Paper Acceptance Date : December 28, 2021 ; Paper Published Online : April 15, 2022.

User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Amyx, S. (2014). Wearables gushing with emotions : A new brand-engagement architecture. In, IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 4(1), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2014.2361162

  • Dehghani, M., Kim, K. J., & Dangelico, R. M. (2018). Will smart watches last ? Factors contributing to intention to keep using smart wearable technology. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.01.007

  • Dehghani, M. (2016, March). An assessment towards adoption and diffusion of smart wearable technologies by consumers: The cases of smart watch and fitness wristband products. HT (Extended Proceedings), 1– 6.

  • Dehghani, M. (2018). Exploring the motivational factors on continuous usage intention of smartwatches among actual users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1424246

  • Jung, Y., Kim, S., & Choi, B. (2016). Consumer valuation of the wearables : The case of smart watches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040

  • Kalantari, M. (2017). Consumers' adoption of wearable technologies : Literature review, synthesis, and future research agenda. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 12(3), 274–307. https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2017.089665

  • Kesharwani, A., & Roy, S. (2017). Diffusion of mobile health apps among smartphone users: Role of neighbourhood effects, informational network effects, and social ties in health 3.0. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i4/112679

  • Kim, K. J., & Shin, D. - H. (2015). An acceptance model for smart watches : Implications for the adoption of future wearable technology. Internet Research, 25(4), 527–541. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_23

  • Lazar, A., Koehler, C., Tanenbaum, T. J., & Nguyen, D. H. (2015). Why we use and abandon smart devices. In, UbiComp '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 635–646). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804288

  • Lee, C., & Coughlin, J. F. (2015). PERSPECTIVE: Older adults' adoption of technology: An integrated approach to identifying determinants and barriers. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12176

  • Mani, Z., & Chouk, I. (2017). Drivers of consumers' resistance to smart products. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(1–2), 76–97. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1245212

  • Motti, V. G., & Caine, K. (2016, September). Smart wearables or dumb wearables? : Understanding how context impacts the UX in wrist worn interaction. In, SIGDOC '16: Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (pp. 1–10). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2987592.2987606

  • Ozer, L., & Gultekin, B. (2015). Pre-and post-purchase stage in impulse buying: The role of mood and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.10.004

  • Pfeiffer, J., von Entress - Fuersteneck, M., Urbach, N., & Buchwald, A. (2016). Quantify-me: Consumer acceptance of wearable self-tracking devices (Research Papers 99). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/99

  • Rashel, A., Ahmed, F., & Lee, S. (2017). Consumer buying behaviour in high-tech product markets: An empirical study on analog wrist watches from the Bangladeshi perspective. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(10), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i10/118696

  • Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTMKT.2016.075690

  • Rawassizadeh, R., Price, B. A., & Petre, M. (2014). Wearables: Has the age of smart watches finally arrived? Communications of the ACM, 58(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2629633

  • Talukder, M. S., Chiong, R., Bao, Y., & Hayat Malik, B. (2019). Acceptance and use predictors of fitness wearable technology and intention to recommend: An empirical study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(1), 170 – 188. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2018-0009

  • Wu, L. - H., Wu, L. - C., & Chang, S. - C. (2016). Exploring consumers' intention to accept smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 383–392. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.chb.2016.07.005

  • Zhang, N., Guo, X., & Chen, G. (2008). IDT-TAM integrated model for IT adoption. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 306 – 311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(08)70049-X


Abstract Views: 155

PDF Views: 1




  • Exploring the Plausibility of Pre-Purchase Decision Process in User Acceptance of Smart Wearable Technology Devices

Abstract Views: 155  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Prateek Gupta
Assistant Professor, Noida Institute of Engineering and Technology, 19, Institutional Area, Knowledge Park II, Greater Noida - 201 306, Uttar Pradesh, India
Barkathunissa
Assistant Professor, School of Business & Management, Christ (Deemed to be) University, Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560 029, India

Abstract


The market for smart wearable technology products is growing rapidly. Although wearable technology is still in its early stages, a longer-term outlook is required. This study inspected the existence of consumers’ pre-purchase stage for smart wearable technology devices. It further analyzed the factors that influenced customers’ decisions in the pre-purchase phase. The methodology adopted was quantitative, using which 240 users of smart wearables were given a structured questionnaire to fill up. The Smart PLS 3.0 software was used for structural equation modeling and path analysis. The results indicated that customers go through a pre-purchase decision journey. Their decisions are influenced by individual characteristics, product description, information source utility, data usefulness, trust, visibility of the product, and demonstrability. Together, these factors resulted in the customers’ successful transition from the pre-purchase stage to the purchase decision stage.

Keywords


Pre-Purchase Decision Process, Need Recognition, Information Search, Evaluation of Alternatives, Smart Technology Wearables (SWT), Consumer Behavior, Purchase Intention.

Paper Submission Date : May 10, 2021 ; Paper Sent Back for Revision : July 8, 2021 ; Paper Acceptance Date : December 28, 2021 ; Paper Published Online : April 15, 2022.


References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom%2F2022%2Fv52%2Fi4%2F169109