Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study on Preparation of Fig Burfi


Affiliations
1 Department of Animal Science and Dairy Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
2 Department of Animal Science and Dairy Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present investigation was aimed to incorporate fig paste in khoa to formulate a novel type of Burfi. Fig Burfi was prepared from different proportions of buffalo milk and fig paste i.e. 97.50:2.50 (T1), 96.25:3.75 (T2), 95.0:5.00 (T3) and it is compared to market fig Burfi (T0). The combination T2 was superior with a rating of 8.30 in respect of colour and appearance. The body and texture of T2 combination was superior at 8.10 which was followed by T1 at 7.75. The flavor rating for the combination T2 was 8.10 whereas combination T3 occurred at 7.85. The highest rating for taste of T2 was 8.10 which were followed by T3 at 8.01.The sensory score for overall acceptability of fig Burfi of treatments T0, T1, T2 and T3 were 6.95, 7.63, 8.12 and 7.55, respectively. It was observed that 3.75 per cent (T2) level of fig paste was most acceptable and rated between like very much to like extremely for all sensory attributes.

Keywords

Buffalo Milk, Burfi, Fig, Khoa, Sensory Evaluation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Condit, I. J. (1995). The average composition of edible part of the fresh Indian fig. Health Bulletin, 24(2): 44.
  • De, S. (1991). Outline of dairy technology. Oxford University Press, Bombay, pp. 385-389.
  • Dharmadhikari, A.D. (2002). Studeis on development of fig (Ficus carica L.) Burfi. M.Tech. Thesis, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA).
  • Ferro, N. (2003). Medical value of fig. Indian Food Packer, 57(1):6
  • Gupta, S.A. (1999). Sensory evaluation in food industry. Indian Dairyman, 28(7):293-395.
  • Kathalkar, M.S. (1995).Milk ber pulp Burfi like product. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA).
  • Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. ICAR. New Delhi (INDIA).
  • Patil, J.D. (1983). Nutritional studies on Daulatabadi fig. Ph.D. Thesis, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA).
  • Wakchaure, S.K. (1998). Studies on preparation of milk sapota pulp Burfi. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA).

Abstract Views: 241

PDF Views: 0




  • Study on Preparation of Fig Burfi

Abstract Views: 241  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. P. Matkar
Department of Animal Science and Dairy Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
S. G. Narwade
Department of Animal Science and Dairy Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India
S. P. Poul
Department of Animal Science and Dairy Science, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), India

Abstract


The present investigation was aimed to incorporate fig paste in khoa to formulate a novel type of Burfi. Fig Burfi was prepared from different proportions of buffalo milk and fig paste i.e. 97.50:2.50 (T1), 96.25:3.75 (T2), 95.0:5.00 (T3) and it is compared to market fig Burfi (T0). The combination T2 was superior with a rating of 8.30 in respect of colour and appearance. The body and texture of T2 combination was superior at 8.10 which was followed by T1 at 7.75. The flavor rating for the combination T2 was 8.10 whereas combination T3 occurred at 7.85. The highest rating for taste of T2 was 8.10 which were followed by T3 at 8.01.The sensory score for overall acceptability of fig Burfi of treatments T0, T1, T2 and T3 were 6.95, 7.63, 8.12 and 7.55, respectively. It was observed that 3.75 per cent (T2) level of fig paste was most acceptable and rated between like very much to like extremely for all sensory attributes.

Keywords


Buffalo Milk, Burfi, Fig, Khoa, Sensory Evaluation.

References