Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Innovating Final Year (Capstone) Projects in Engineering Education


Affiliations
1 SVKM’s NMIMS (Deemed-to-be-University), Shirpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The final year (capstone) projects are the largest-and in many cases the only-projects that engineering students execute. The projects require sufficient attention both at the selection and execution phases. We designed and delivered a workshop to the final (senior) year students, at the start of the year. It helped them to choose projects aligned with their passions and that can solve real life problems. Twenty nine out of thirty seven students-who attended the workshop-opined that they changed the direction or the project. We require iterating the experiment with more number of students for validation of the concept and refining the workshop to accrue benefits to more students.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • (AICTE), (2013 Accessed on 26 Jan 2015). Growth of Technical Institutions. from http://www.aicteindia. org/downloads/Growth_Technical_Institutio ns_310514.pdf#toolbar=0

  • ABET. (2014). CRITERIA FOR ACCREDITING ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMS. Baltimoe USA.

  • Bell, S. (2010). Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39-43. doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415

  • Covey, S. (1989). The seven habits of highly successful people. Fireside/Simon & Schuster.

  • Dyer, W. (1995). Team building: Current issues and new alternatives. . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120. doi: 10.1002/j.21689830.2005.tb00832.x

  • Engineering", N. A. o. (2004). The Engineer of 2020: visions of engineering in the new century, : National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2004.

  • Goel, S. (2006). Competency focused engineering education with reference to IT related disciplines: is the Indian system ready for transformation? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 5(1), 27-52.

  • Grimson, J. (2002). Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(1), 31-37. doi: 10.1080/03043790110100803

  • Koehn, E. (1999). ABET program criteria for educating engineering students. International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEE'99, Paper 413,.

  • Michaelsen, L. K. (1992). Team Learning: A Comprehensive Approach for Harnessing the Power of Small Groups in Higher Education.Digital Commons@University of Nebraska Lincoln.

  • Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education—Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 2-16.

  • NBA. (2012). Manual for Accreditation of Undergraduate Engineering Programs. New Delhi India: National Board of Accrediation.

  • Ogot, M., & Okudan., G. E. Integrating Systemic Creativity into First Year Engineering Design Curriculum.International Journal of Engineering Education 22.1 (2006): 109.

  • Olson, S. (2013). Educating Engineers: Preparing 21st Century Leaders in the Context of New Modes of Learning:: Summary of a Forum: National Academies Press.

  • Perrenet, J. C., Bouhuijs, P. A. J., & Smits, J. G. M. M. (2000). The Suitability of Problem-based Learning for Engineering Education: Theory and practice.Teaching in Higher Education, 5(3), 345-358. doi: 10.1080/713699144

  • Prem Krishna, e. a. (2014). INAE 2037-VISION, MISSION, AND VALUES. New Delhi, India: INAE.

  • Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123-138. doi: 10.1002/j.21689830.2006.tb00884.x

  • Sibley, J. a., & Spiridoff, S. (2010). What is TBL? http://www.teambasedlearning.org/: The University of British Columbia, Retrieved Feb 23, 2015.

  • Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorensen, C. D., Swan, B. R., & Anthony, D. K. (1995). A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 165-174.

  • Vaitheeswaran, V. (Oct 11th 2007). Something new under the sun. The Economist.

  • Vest, C. (2008). Context and challenge for twenty-first century engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 235-236.

  • Waychal, P. (2015). The Index of Learning Style to Measure and the Student-Centered Learning Strategies to Develop Creativity Competency. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 97112.

  • Waychal, P., Mohanty, R., & Verma, A. (2011). Determinants of innovation as a competence: an empirical study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5(2), 192-211.


Abstract Views: 267

PDF Views: 2




  • Innovating Final Year (Capstone) Projects in Engineering Education

Abstract Views: 267  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Pradeep Waychal
SVKM’s NMIMS (Deemed-to-be-University), Shirpur, India

Abstract


The final year (capstone) projects are the largest-and in many cases the only-projects that engineering students execute. The projects require sufficient attention both at the selection and execution phases. We designed and delivered a workshop to the final (senior) year students, at the start of the year. It helped them to choose projects aligned with their passions and that can solve real life problems. Twenty nine out of thirty seven students-who attended the workshop-opined that they changed the direction or the project. We require iterating the experiment with more number of students for validation of the concept and refining the workshop to accrue benefits to more students.

References