Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Team and Project Based Learning for a Sophomore Course on Digital System Design


Affiliations
1 SVKM'S NMIMS, Shirpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The paper describes our experience of using team-and project-based learning (TBL PBL) instructional strategy, which, despite strong evidence of efficacy, is underused - especially - in the early years of engineering education. We describe our framework FAME (form, allocate, monitor and evaluate) for operationalizing the strategy and illustrate it's usage for a sophomore course in digital system design. We found that the strategy resulted in students understanding basic concepts well and utilizing them in developing real life applications as well as developing teamwork, self-learning, and time management skills. We believe that the framework and our experience can be helpful to other faculty members to implement the TBL PBL strategy in their courses.

Keywords

Project Based Learning, Team Based Learning, Digital System Design.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bourne, J., D. Harris, and F. Mayadas, Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 131-146.

  • Koehn, E., ABET program criteria for educating engineering students. International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEE'99, Paper 413,..(1999), Available on-line at http://www.fs.vsb.cz/akce/1999/ICEE99/Pro ceedings/papers/413/413.htm.

  • Grimson, J., Re-engineering the curriculum for the 21st century. European Journal of Engineering Education, 2002. 27(1): p. 31-37.

  • Ryan, R.M. and E.L. Deci, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2000. 25(1): p. 54-67.

  • Ohland,M.W. andR.A. Layton. Comparing the reliability of two peer evaluation instruments. in 2000 Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings. 2000.

  • Nigel Spinks, N.S.a.D.B., Educating Engineers for the 21st Century: The Industry View. 2006, The Royal Academy of Engineering.

  • Bell, S., Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 2010. 83(2): p. 39-43.

  • National Science Foundation, Systemic Engineering Education Reform: An Action Agenda. 1997, National Science Foundation, : www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/getpub?nsf9827, .

  • Salas, E., Dickinson, T.L., Converse, S.A. and Tannenbaum, S.I. , ed.Toward an understanding of team performance and training Teams: Their Training and Performance,. ed. R.W.a.S. Swezey, E. 1992, Ablex Publ ishing Corporation, :Westport,CT,. pp. 3-29.

  • Sibley, J.S., S. Retrieved February 23, 2011,,What isTBL? (2010). The University of British Columbia - Faculty of Applied Science : http://www.teambasedlearning.org/.

  • Michaelsen, L.K., Team Learning: A Comprehensive Approach for Harnessing the Power of Small Groups in Higher Education. Digital Commons@University ofNebraska -Lincoln, 1992.

  • Prince, M.J. and R.M. Felder, Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 2006. 95(2): p. 123-138.

  • Mills, J.E. and D.F. Treagust, Engineering education—Is problem-based or project based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 2003. 3: p. 2-16.

  • Acar, B.S., and I.A. Newman, Students as Tutors—Learning Problem-Solving Skills hy Tutoring PBL. Intemational Journal of Engineering Education, , 2003. 19 (5): p. 712-716.

  • Perrenet, J.C., P.A.J. Bouhuijs, and J.G.M.M. Smits, The Suitability of Problem-based Learning for Engineering Education: Theory and practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 2000. 5(3): p. 345358.

  • Entwistle, N., V.McCune, and J. Hounsell, Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Enhancing Teaching and Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses Occasional Report, 2002. 1.

  • Perry Jr, W.G., Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. 1999: ERIC.

  • Lehmann, M., et al., Problem-oriented and project-based learning (POPBL) as an innovative learning strategy for sustainable development in engineering education. European Journal of Engineer ing Education, 2008. 33(3): p. 283-295.

  • Dym, C.L., et al., Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p. 103-120.

  • Barrows, H.S., How to Design a Problem Based Curriculum for the Preclinical Years. 1985, NewYork,N.Y.:: Springer Verlag.

  • Dyer, W., Team building: Current issues and new alternatives. . 1995, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

  • Nelson,W.A., Problem solving through design. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003. 2003(95): p. 39-44.

  • Star Legacy Modules. Iris Center for Faculty Enhancement,Vanderbilt University.

  • Mariela A. Rodríguez, J.G.a.P.G.S., Preparing School Leaders to Effectively Support Special Education Programs: Using Modules in Educational Leadership in the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration. 2006: San Antonio,Texas

  • Hernandez, S.A., Team learning in a marketing principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 2002. 24(1): p. 73-85.

  • Connerley, M.L. and F.A. Mael, The Importance and Invasiveness of Student Team Selection Criteria. Journal of Management Education, 2001. 25(5): p. 471-494.

  • Song, H.-D. and B.L. Grabowski, Stimulating intrinsic motivation for problem solving using goal-oriented contexts and peer group composition. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2006. 54(5): p. 445-466.

  • Deibel, K., Team formation methods for increasing interaction during in-class group work, in Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education. 2005, ACM:Caparica, Portugal. p. 291-295.

  • Bandow, D., Time to create sound teamwork. Journal for Quality and Participation, 2001. 24(2).

  • Bransford, J.D., A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How people learn. 2000,Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • McKendall, M., Teaching Groups to Become Teams. Journal of Education for Business, 2000. 75(5): p. 277-282.

  • Brooks, C.M. and J. L. Ammons, Free Riding in Group Projects and the Effects of Timing, Frequency, and Specificity of Criteria in Peer Assessments. Journal of Education for Business, 2003. 78(5): p. 268-272.

  • Brown, R. Autorating: Getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork. in Frontiers in Education Conference, 1995. Proceedings., 1995. 1995. IEEE.

  • Szymanski, M.H. and J. Whalen,Making work visible: ethnographically grounded case studies of work practice. 2011: Cambridge University Press.

  • Garfinkel;, H., Studies in Ethnomethodology. . 1967, Englewood Cliffs,NJ: PrenticeHall,.

  • James, P.S., Interoccupational teamwork in a home health setting:An ethnography, in Faculty of Social Sciences. 1990, University of Denver.

  • cihub.Available from: https://cihub.org/.

  • Glaser, B., Strauss, A., The Discovery of Grounded Theory. . 1967, Hawthorne, NY.: Aldine PublishingCompany,.


Abstract Views: 288

PDF Views: 0




  • Team and Project Based Learning for a Sophomore Course on Digital System Design

Abstract Views: 288  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Pradeep Waychal
SVKM'S NMIMS, Shirpur, India

Abstract


The paper describes our experience of using team-and project-based learning (TBL PBL) instructional strategy, which, despite strong evidence of efficacy, is underused - especially - in the early years of engineering education. We describe our framework FAME (form, allocate, monitor and evaluate) for operationalizing the strategy and illustrate it's usage for a sophomore course in digital system design. We found that the strategy resulted in students understanding basic concepts well and utilizing them in developing real life applications as well as developing teamwork, self-learning, and time management skills. We believe that the framework and our experience can be helpful to other faculty members to implement the TBL PBL strategy in their courses.

Keywords


Project Based Learning, Team Based Learning, Digital System Design.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2016%2Fv30i2%2F105454