Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

PO Assessment and Attainment through POGIL Based Classes


Affiliations
1 Biomedical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan & Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
2 A. Merline, Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sethu Institute of Technology, India
3 S.R.M Institute of Science and Technology, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This paper describes the development of POGIL based instructional design classes for complex engineering problems described in the Program Outcomes (PO) of National Board of Accreditation (NBA), India accreditation criteria. Embedded system Design course in Electronics and Communication Engineering course (ECE) is considered for experimentation. Subsequently it aims at providing students and interested fresh faculty an opportunity to design and build the project on their own. The aim of the project is to design a round robin based embedded system where the tasks are of their choice. To structure and complete their design part, both students and faculty were posed with a large number of questions. They were asked to refer literature and data sheets for their work. Once the design part was reviewed to avoid critical errors, students built their project and compared solutions to theoretical predictions. Feedback was collected and analysed to determine the effectiveness of POGIL in PO attainment. The reflections given by both faculty and students were positive, in particular students found that solving complex engineering problems are quite difficult and challenging compared to other prescribed book end exercises but POGIL helped them to be more constructive to build their knowledge.

Keywords

POGIL, Descriptors, Personification.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Barrie, S. (2005). Rethinking generic graduate attributes, HERDSA News, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, vol 27(1),pp.1-6.

  • Bhimasen Soragaon1 & K S Mahesh (2015) , “Measuring Attainment of Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes – A Simplified Approach as per Self-Assessment Report” , IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education vol 4 pp 1318,

  • Biggs, J (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university, Open University Press: Buckingham, McGraw-Hill Education (UK)

  • Bowden, J., Hart, G., King, B., Trigwell, K. & Watts, O. (2000). Generic capabilities of ATN niversity Graduates, Canberra: Australian Government Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. http://www.clt.uts.edu.au /atn.grad.cap.project.index.htm

  • Darrall Thompson, (2008), ” Software as a facilitator of graduate attribute integration and student self-assessment” ATN Assessment conference: Engaging Students with Assessment , pp. 234–246, DOI : http://hdl.handle.net/10453/11332

  • David M. Hanson, (2003). Designing ProcessOriented Guided-Inquiry Activities , http://www.pcrest.com/research/fgb/2_4_14.pdf Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Volume , No, Month 2015, ISSN 2349-2473, eISSN 2394-1707

  • Dena Hale & Linda Greef Mullen,(2009). Designing Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Activities: A New Innovation for marketing classes, Marketing Education Review, Vol 19(1)

  • Elliot P. Douglas, Chu-Chuan Chiu,” Processo riented G uided Inq uiry L earning in Engineering” International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education (ICTLHE 2012) in conjunction with RCEE & RHED 2012

  • Hughes C & S. Barrie, (2010), “Influences on the assessment of graduate attributes in higher education, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), pp. 325–334.

  • Lawrence Meda & Arthur James Swart,(2017).Graduate Attributes in Electrical Engineering a case study, International Journal of Engineering Education Vol. 33 2(A), pp. 653–661

  • Masoodhu Banu N.M & Rajeswari K. (2017, June). POGIL based classes for communication engineering course, 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, Canada

  • Nghiem, L. D., Goldfinch, T. Bell, M. (2010).Embedding graduate attribute development into the engineering curriculum: less is more?. The 21st Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, pp. 165169. Sydney: Australasia Association of Engineering Education.

  • Priya Sawant, (2016) “Implementation of Outcome Based Education: A Beginning, Journal of Engineering Education Transformations,vol29, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289686628_Implementation_of_Outcome_Based_Educat ion_ A_Beginning

  • Rachel Spronken-Smith , Carol Bond.,Angela McLean., Martin Jenkins., Stanley Frielick., Nell Smith., & Stephen Marshall, Developing and Embedding Graduate Attributes: Lessons for lecturers, programme directors , heads of department and senior managers in higher education institutions ” available online https://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/download/ng/file/gro up- 4/developing-and-embedding-graduateattributes- spronken-smith-2014.pdf

  • Sahasrabudhe, S.C(2014). CO-PO mapping and attainment of C O - P O . http://www.nbaind.org/files/co-po-mappingand- attainment-of-cos-and-pos.pdf

  • Sumison, J. and Goodfellow, J. (2004) “Identifying generic skills through curriculum mapping: a critical evaluation” Higher Education Research and Development, 23, 329–346.

  • Wendy Green, Sarah Hammer & Cassandra Star (2009). Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes?, Higher Education Research & Development, 28:1, 1729, DOI: 10.1080/07294360802444339


Abstract Views: 291

PDF Views: 0




  • PO Assessment and Attainment through POGIL Based Classes

Abstract Views: 291  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

N. M. Masoodhu Banu
Biomedical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan & Dr.Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, India
A. Merline
A. Merline, Electronics and Communication Engineering, Sethu Institute of Technology, India
T. Sujithra
S.R.M Institute of Science and Technology, India

Abstract


This paper describes the development of POGIL based instructional design classes for complex engineering problems described in the Program Outcomes (PO) of National Board of Accreditation (NBA), India accreditation criteria. Embedded system Design course in Electronics and Communication Engineering course (ECE) is considered for experimentation. Subsequently it aims at providing students and interested fresh faculty an opportunity to design and build the project on their own. The aim of the project is to design a round robin based embedded system where the tasks are of their choice. To structure and complete their design part, both students and faculty were posed with a large number of questions. They were asked to refer literature and data sheets for their work. Once the design part was reviewed to avoid critical errors, students built their project and compared solutions to theoretical predictions. Feedback was collected and analysed to determine the effectiveness of POGIL in PO attainment. The reflections given by both faculty and students were positive, in particular students found that solving complex engineering problems are quite difficult and challenging compared to other prescribed book end exercises but POGIL helped them to be more constructive to build their knowledge.

Keywords


POGIL, Descriptors, Personification.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2020%2Fv33i4%2F146126