Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Case Study of Implementation of Active - Cooperative Learning Approaches Introduced through a Faculty Development Programme and their Effects on the Pass Percentage of Undergraduate Engineering Students


Affiliations
1 Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Center for Experiential Learning, SR University, Warangal−506371, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


It is conventionally believed that good academic results of the institutions can be accomplished if there are more subject experts. But it is also a reality that while teacher may not know the learning behaviour of students, students themselves do not know in what way they should study to get good marks. This paper describes how classroom implementation of cooperative learning practices by a faculty member after a faculty training programme affected the pass percentage of second and fourth year undergraduate engineering students in an autonomous engineering college.

Keywords

Faculty Training, Engineering Students, Learning Styles, Active-cooperative Learning, Jigsaw, Flipped Classroom, Pass Percentage.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • G. Caine, R. Nummela, and G. Caine, "Making connections: Teaching and the human brain." 1991.
  • R. Sylwester, "What the Biology of the Brain Tells Us about Learning." Educational leadership 51, no. 4, pp. 46-51, 1994.
  • R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Understanding student differences.” Journal of engineering education, 94(1), pp. 57-72, 2005.
  • N. Arranz, F. Ubierna, M. F. Arroyabe, C. Perez, and J. C. Fdez. de Arroyabe, “The effect of curricular and extracurricular activities on university students' entrepreneurial intention and competences.” Studies in Higher Education, 42, no. 11, pp.1979-2008, 2017.
  • B. R. Joyce, and B. Showers, “Student achievement through staff development.” 2002.
  • G. Gibbs and C. Martin, "The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students." Active learning in higher education , vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 87-100, 2004.
  • Mueller, Robin, and Meadow Schroeder. "From Seeing to Doing: Examining the Impact of NonEvaluative Classroom Observation on Teaching Development." Innovative Higher Education 43, no. 5, pp. 397-410, 2018.
  • R. M. Felder, and L. K. Silverman, “Learning and teaching styles in engineering education.” Engineering education, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 674681, 1988.
  • Magana, Alejandra J., Camilo Vieira, and Mireille Boutin. "Characterizing Engineering Learners' Preferences for Active and Passive Learning Methods." IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 46-54, 2018.
  • R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Active learning: An introduction.” ASQ higher education brief, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1-5, 2009.
  • R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “Cooperative learning.” In Active learning: Models from the analytical sciences, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 970, pp. 34-53, 2007.
  • J. L. Bishop and M. A. Verleger, “The flipped classroom: A survey of the research.” In ASEE national conference proceedings, Atlanta, GA, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1-18, 2013.
  • Kumbar, S.S., Bidnurkar, A., Tamhane, K.N. and Kumbar, R.B., 2018. Case Study on need of ICT in Teaching Learning Process. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 7-11, 2018.
  • Salimath, Suman, M. Vijaylakshmi, and Ashok S. Shettar. "A Comparative Study of Team Based Learning and Individual Learning." Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 2018.
  • Johnson, A. W., Blackburn, M. W., Su, M. P., & Finelli, C. J. “How a Flexible Classroom Affords Active Learning in Electrical Engineering.” IEEE Transactions on Education, pp. 1-8, 2018.

Abstract Views: 516

PDF Views: 178




  • A Case Study of Implementation of Active - Cooperative Learning Approaches Introduced through a Faculty Development Programme and their Effects on the Pass Percentage of Undergraduate Engineering Students

Abstract Views: 516  |  PDF Views: 178

Authors

Shankaranand Jha
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Center for Experiential Learning, SR University, Warangal−506371, India

Abstract


It is conventionally believed that good academic results of the institutions can be accomplished if there are more subject experts. But it is also a reality that while teacher may not know the learning behaviour of students, students themselves do not know in what way they should study to get good marks. This paper describes how classroom implementation of cooperative learning practices by a faculty member after a faculty training programme affected the pass percentage of second and fourth year undergraduate engineering students in an autonomous engineering college.

Keywords


Faculty Training, Engineering Students, Learning Styles, Active-cooperative Learning, Jigsaw, Flipped Classroom, Pass Percentage.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2020%2Fv34i1%2F155007