Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Enhancement of Engineering Education by Incorporating Active Learning Methodologies


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur Campus. Chennai, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In recent years, there has been a decline in the number of students opting for engineering education worldwide. Especially, the declining enrollment in engineering programs was observed sharp for the last two years in India. The widening unfulfilled gap between the educational institutional purposes and the engineering aspirations are exponentially increasing in recent years. Strong knowledge of international trends in engineering education is vital to introduce the state-of-art infrastructure active and project-based learning facilities in the institutions to impart the required competent skills. A case study on active learning methods is implemented on one of the undergraduate courses and academic performance are compared with the feedback. The top-two learning methodologies are found effective to be project-based learning and conference publication. ALM is observed to be one of the motivating factors to enhance the project-based learning among science and engineering students towards capability development. The student's involvement in learning certainly improves their competency and it could be enhanced by the activity based learning methodologies (ALM) rather than the classroom teaching.

Keywords

Active Learning, Engineering Education, Project-based Learning, Attrition Rate, Sustainability in Education.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Alario-Hoyos, C., I. Estévez-Ayres, C. D. Kloos, P. J. Muñoz-Merino, E. Llorente-Pérez, and J. Villena-Román. 2019. “Redesigning a freshman engineering course to promote active learning by flipping the classroom through the reuse of MOOCs.” International Journal of Engineering Education 35(1): 385-396.

  • Ankiewicz, P. 2019. “Alignment of the traditional approach to perceptions and attitudes with Mitcham's philosophical framework of t echnology.” Int erna tional Journal of Technology and Design Education 29(2): 329340.

  • Ankiewicz, P. 2019. “Perceptions and attitudes of pupils towards technology: In search of a rigorous theoretical framework.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 29(1): 37-56.

  • As hr af , M.W. , an d F. Al ane zi . 202 0. “Incorporation of sustainability concepts into the engineering core program by adopting a micro curriculum approach: A case study in Saudi Arabia.” Sustainability 12(7): 2901.

  • Ayalon, H., and O. Mcdossi. 2019. “Economic achievements of nonacademic parents and patterns of enrollment in higher education of their children: the case of Israel.” Higher Education 77(1): 135-153.

  • Barlow, A., and S. Brown. 2020. "Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses." International Journal of STEM Education 7(1): 18.

  • Baughman, J., L. Hassall, and X. Xu. 2019. “Comparison of student team dynamics between nonflipped and flipped versions of a largeenrollment sophomore design engineering course.” Journal of Engineering Education 108(1): 103-118.

  • Borrego, M., D. B. Knight, K. Gibbs, and E. Crede. 2018. “Pursuing Graduate Study: Factors Underlying Undergraduate Engineering Students' Decisions.” Journal of Engineering Education 107(1): 140-163.

  • Brackett, M. A., C. S. Bailey, J. D. Hoffmann, and D. N. Simmons. 2019. “RULER: A TheoryDriven, Sys temic Approach to Social, Emot iona l , and Ac ademi c Lea rn ing. ” Educational Psychologist 54 (3): 144-161.

  • Brand, B. R. 2020. "Integrating science and engineering practices: outcomes from a collaborative professional development." International Journal of STEM Education 7(1): 13.

  • Chien, S. I., C. Su, C. C. Chou, and W. R. Li. 2018. “Visual Observation and Practical Application of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells in High School Energy Education.” Journal of Chemical Education 95(7): 1167-1172.

  • Cunningham, C. M., C. P. Lachapelle, R. T. Brennan, C. S. A. Tunis, and C. A. Gentry. 2020. “The impact of engineering curriculum design principles on elementary students' engineering and science learning.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57(3): 423-453.

  • Dharwadkar, K. N., and G. Shingan. 2017. "Student Quality Circle: Skilful Learning Environment.” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 31 (2):57-67.

  • Hess, J. L., J. Beever, C. B. Zoltowski, L. Kisselburgh, and A. O. Brightman. 2019. “Enhancing engineering students' ethical reasoning: Situating reflexive principlism within the SIRA framework.” Journal of Engineering Education 108(1): 82-102.

  • Ikuma, L. H., A. Steele, S. Dann, O. Adio, W. N. Waggenspack. 2019. “Large-scale student programs increase persistence in STEM fields in a public university setting.” Journal of Engineering Education 108(1): 57-81.

  • Karim, A., M. Campbell, and M. Hasan. 2020. “A new method of integrating project-based and work-integrated learning in postgraduate engineering study.” Curriculum Journal 31(1): 157-173.

  • Kingdon, P. 2018. “The cosmopolit an engineering student: an analysis of a recruitment campaign for KTH Royal Ins titut e of Technology in Stockholm.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 28(3): 787-802.

  • Marjanovic, U., N. Simeunovic, M. Delić, Z. Bojanic, and B. Lalic. 2018. “Assessing the success of university social networking sites: Engineering students ' perspective.” International Journal of Engineering Education 34(4): 1363-1375.

  • Murray, J. K., J. A. Studer, S. R. Daly, S. McKilligan, and C. M. Seifert. 2019. “Design by taking perspectives: How engineers explore problems.” Journal of Engineering Education 108(2): 248–275.

  • Naik, B. M. 2019. “Indian universities and colleges, where do they fall short, with respect to world best? Teaching of Research & Innovation skills in universities & colleges is the major handicap If India ignores, future Generations will not pardon us.” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 32 (4): 61-66.

  • Öncel, A. F., and A. Kara. 2019. “A flipped classroom in communication systems: Student perception and performance assessments.” International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 56(3): 208-221.

  • Patil, U., V. B. Suneeta, V. S. Saroja, and K. M. Uma. 2016. "Activity based teaching learning: An experience." Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Special issue.

  • Paul, D., B. Nepal, M. D. Johnson, and T. J. Jacobs. 2018. “Examining validity of general self-efficacy scale for assessing engineering students' self-efficacy.” International Journal of Engineering Education 34(5): 1671-1686.

  • Raghu Echempati. 2019. “Integration of real life examples, safety concerns and societal impact as learning outcomes of mechanical engineering courses.” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 32 (3): 7-18.

  • Rouvrais, S., B. Remaud, and M. Saveuse. 2020. “Work-based learning models in engineering curricula: insight from the French experience.” European Journal of Engineering Education 45(1): 89-102.

  • Ruiz-Rivas, U., J. Martinez-Crespo, M. Venegas, and M. Chinchilla-Sanchez. 2020. “Energy engine er in g cur ri cul a for sus ta inabl e development considering underserved areas.” Journal of Cleaner Production 258:120960.

  • Tasdemir, C., and R. Gazo. 2020. “Integrating sustainability into higher education curriculum through a transdisciplinary perspective.” Journal of Cleaner Production 265: 121759.

  • Thanikachalam, V., 2019. “Desired educational ecosystem in the fast-growing educational institutes in India.” Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 32 (4): 7-11.

  • Yan, J., L. Li, J. Yin, and Y. Nie. 2018. “A comparison of flipped and traditional classroom l earning: A case s tudy in mechanica l engineering.” Int ernational Journal of Engineering Education 34(6): 1876-1887.

  • Yoon, S. Y., P. K. Imbrie, T. Reed, and K. J. Shryock. 2018. “Identi fi cation of the engineering gateway subjects in the second-year engineering common curriculum.” International Journal of Engineering Education 35(1): 232-251.


Abstract Views: 386

PDF Views: 161




  • Enhancement of Engineering Education by Incorporating Active Learning Methodologies

Abstract Views: 386  |  PDF Views: 161

Authors

R. Senthil
Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur Campus. Chennai, India

Abstract


In recent years, there has been a decline in the number of students opting for engineering education worldwide. Especially, the declining enrollment in engineering programs was observed sharp for the last two years in India. The widening unfulfilled gap between the educational institutional purposes and the engineering aspirations are exponentially increasing in recent years. Strong knowledge of international trends in engineering education is vital to introduce the state-of-art infrastructure active and project-based learning facilities in the institutions to impart the required competent skills. A case study on active learning methods is implemented on one of the undergraduate courses and academic performance are compared with the feedback. The top-two learning methodologies are found effective to be project-based learning and conference publication. ALM is observed to be one of the motivating factors to enhance the project-based learning among science and engineering students towards capability development. The student's involvement in learning certainly improves their competency and it could be enhanced by the activity based learning methodologies (ALM) rather than the classroom teaching.

Keywords


Active Learning, Engineering Education, Project-based Learning, Attrition Rate, Sustainability in Education.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2020%2Fv34i1%2F155008