Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Question Items for Specific Lecture Types in College for More Adequate Student Evaluation on Instructors' Teaching Performance


Affiliations
1 Early Childhood Education Department, Woosong University, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
2 Early Childhood Education Department, Changshin University, Changwon, Korea, Republic of
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study attempted to propose refined question items used for eight types of lectures practiced in college settings (i.e., theory-based learning, flipped learning, discussion-based lectures, problem-based learning, co-teaching, Capstone Design, e-learning, and laboratory lectures). Its purpose was to help students objectively and accurately evaluate the lectures so that the instructors could use the data to improve their teaching effectiveness and to heighten student satisfaction. Extracting data from 15 journal publishers, the study investigated 34 articles published since 2013 in relation to lecture evaluations. Results entail different lecture evaluation question items that well match distinct features each lecture type entails. Further implications for future studies are proposed based on the findings.

Keywords

Higher Education, Course Evaluation Items, Application for Lectures, Student Satisfaction, Lecture Types.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Nam, Won-mok & Cho, Eun-sung. "Analysis of 'Better Class' Characteristics and Patterns from College Lecture Evaluation by Longitudinal Big Data". International Journal of Contents. 15.3 (2019): 7-12

  • Park, Hong-rak. "A Study on the Improvement of a Lecture Evaluation Tool in Higher EducationA case of improvement of a lecture evaluation questionnaire." Journal of the Korea Academia. Industrial Cooperation Society 13.11 (2012): 5033-5043.

  • Yang, Hoe-chang. "The Effects of Students' Cognition of Their College and Department's Core Competencies and Collective-efficacy on Satisfaction and GPA." Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research 1.1 (2016): 51-56.

  • Hur, Youngju. "Analysis of Satisfaction and Needs in College Education of Elementary and Middle School Teachers." Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research 2.1 (2017): 23-28.

  • Lee, Myungsook & Yang, Aekyeong. "Factors Influencing to 21st Century Skill of College Student. Asia-Pacific Journal of Educational Management Research 4.2 (2019): 7-14.

  • Wachtel, Howard K. "Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review." Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 23.2 (1998): 191-212.

  • Emery, Charles R., Kramer, Tracy R., & Tian, Robert G. "Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness." Quality Assurance in Education 11.1 (2003): 37-46.

  • Ko, Eun-mi., Lee, Hye-kyoung., & Han, Eunyoung. "A Study for Development of the Course Evaluation Tool for College Lecture Types." The Journal of Humanities 31 (2013): 365-394.

  • English, John. & English, Tammy. "Combining summative and Formative Evaluation using Automated Assessment." Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology 16 (2019): 141-151.

  • Lee, Jong-gook. "A Study on the Improvement of a Lecture Evaluation Questionnaire in the University." Korean Journal of General Education 7.6 (2013): 247-274.

  • Han, Seung-il., Kim, Hyun-joo, & Lee, Jaeyoung. "A Comprehensive Study of Korean Students' Evaluations of University Teaching." The Journal of Educational Administration 23.3 (2005): 379-403.

  • Yang, Mi-kyoung. "Evaluations of University Teaching: significance and problems." The Korean Society for the Study Educational Principles 13.1 (2008): 93-122.

  • Kim, Myoung-hyun. "Validity and Reliability of Lecture Evaluation." Asia Pacific Education Review 6.3 (2005): 1-24.

  • Park. Hyo-ryun. "A Study on the Improvement of a Lecture Evaluation Tool in Higher Education A case of improvement of a lecture evaluation questionnaire in "A" university." Korea Academic-Industrial Cooperation Society 13.11 (2012): 5033-5043.

  • Amuche, Amuche Christian Igomu & Umar, Mahmood Hamid. "Development and Validation of Lecturer Teaching Assessment Scale for Nigerian Universities." Development 10.5 (2019): 58-69.

  • Park, Sung-moo. "A Study for Development and Validation of the 'Course Evaluation' Scale for Learner-centered." Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education 23.1 (2011): 13-22.

  • Spehl, Marco S, Straub, Christine, Heinzmann, Andrea, & Bode, Sebstian F. "Student-perceived exam difficulty may trump the effects of different quality improvement measures regarding the students' evaluation of a pediatric lecture series." BMC Medical Education 19.1 (2019): 206-213.

  • Arreola, Raoul Albert . "Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System." Magna Publications (2004): Madison, WI, USA.

  • DiVall, Margarita, Barr, Judith, Gonyeau, Michael, Matthews, James, van Amburgh, Jenny, Qualters, Donna, &Trujillo, Jennifer. "Follow-up Assessment of a Faculty Peer Observation and Evaluation Program." American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 76.4 (2012): 1-7.

  • Ojennus, Deanna Dahlke. "Assessment of Learning Gains in a Flipped Biochemistry Classroom." Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 44.1 (2016): 20-27.

  • Davies, Martin, Hirschberg, Joe, Lye, Jenny, Johnston, Carol, and McDonald, Ian. "Is It Your Fault? Influences on Student Evaluations on Teaching in Tertiary Institutions." Australian Journal of Education 43.2 (2005): 1-16.

  • Kifle, Temesgen & Alauddin, Mohammad. "What Determines Students' Perceptions in Course Evaluation Rating in Higher Education?" An Econometric Exploration. Economic Analysis and Policy 52 (2016): 123-130.

  • Hassan, Abu, Ariffin, Mohd, Hamid, Abd, Hassim, Mimi Haryani, Abdul, & Helmi, Sabdula "A Review and Survey of Problembased Learning Application in Engineering Education." Conference on Engineering Education, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2004): 115.

  • Corwin, Lisa, Runyon, Christopher, Robinson Aspen, & Dolan Erin L. "The laboratory course assessment survey: a tool to measure three dimensions of research-course design." Life Sciences Education 14 (2015): 1-1

  • Sobek, DK & Jain, Vikas K. "Two instruments for assessing design outcomes of capstone projects." In Proceeding of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (2004):1-13.

  • Meyer, David G. "Capstone design outcome assessment: Instruments for quantitative evaluation." In Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference (2005):F4DF4D.

  • Ruiz, Jorge G., Mintzer, Michale J., & Leipzig, Rosanne M. "The impact of e-learning in medical education."Academic Medicine 81.3 (2006): 207-212.

  • Ca r ty, Au dr ey & Ma r i e -Fa r r e l l , An n. "Co teaching in a mainstream post primary mathematics classroom: an evaluation of models of co teaching from the perspective of the teachers." Support for Learning 33.2 (2018): 101-121.

  • Kim, Pyong-ho. "Suggestions for Lecture Assessment Items in College Settings." Journal of Education and Social Science 1(2020): 7-14.

  • Mohammed, Tayfour Abdalla & Pandhiani, Sijraj Muhammed. "Analysis of factors affecting student evaluation of teaching effectiveness in Saudi higher education: the case of Jubail University college." American Journal of Educational Research 5.5 (2017): 464-475.

  • Yew, Tee Meng, Jen, Leong Siok, Dawood, Fauziah KP, & Hoay, Kuan Chin. "Designing an Instrument for Providing Better Student Feedback on Teaching Effectiveness." MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences 3.1 (2018): 14-22.

  • Anshuman, Naik, Shashikala, Patel, & Brijesh, Mukherjee. "Improvement of Quality of Lecture by Feedback from Students." International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science 4.12 (2019): 694-695.

  • Cho, Jae-seung. "Determinants of Student Course Evaluation Using Hierarchical Linear Model." Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society 24.6 (2013): 12851296.

  • Carlfjord, Siw, Roback, Kerstin, &Nilsen, Per. "Five Years' Experience of an Annual Course on Implementation Science: An Evaluation among Course Participants." Implementation Science 12.1 (2017): 101-108.


Abstract Views: 410

PDF Views: 165




  • Question Items for Specific Lecture Types in College for More Adequate Student Evaluation on Instructors' Teaching Performance

Abstract Views: 410  |  PDF Views: 165

Authors

Pyong Ho Kim
Early Childhood Education Department, Woosong University, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
Sung Hee Hong
Early Childhood Education Department, Changshin University, Changwon, Korea, Republic of

Abstract


The study attempted to propose refined question items used for eight types of lectures practiced in college settings (i.e., theory-based learning, flipped learning, discussion-based lectures, problem-based learning, co-teaching, Capstone Design, e-learning, and laboratory lectures). Its purpose was to help students objectively and accurately evaluate the lectures so that the instructors could use the data to improve their teaching effectiveness and to heighten student satisfaction. Extracting data from 15 journal publishers, the study investigated 34 articles published since 2013 in relation to lecture evaluations. Results entail different lecture evaluation question items that well match distinct features each lecture type entails. Further implications for future studies are proposed based on the findings.

Keywords


Higher Education, Course Evaluation Items, Application for Lectures, Student Satisfaction, Lecture Types.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2020%2Fv34i2%2F155395