Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Innovation in Online Evaluation for Authentic Assessment


Affiliations
1 Dean SSW & Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, India
2 Assistant Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, India
3 Principal & Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In the present pandemic condition, challenge as a teacher, is not only to learn new tools for online teaching but also conducting online assessment and to assure that the assessment curves are not flat but shall be a natural response which has bell shaped distribution. We all know the impact of flat evaluation is that the industry will lose trust on the quality of graduate and their knowledge based on marks/grades. This will put the quality of technical education under doubt when high scorers perform poorly in the recruitment process (including job interviews) where students are not even able to pass the basic aptitude clearance test.

Online education may not lack the quality and integrity of face- to-face instruction, but it is easy to cheat in online assessment. So, there is a need to develop some innovative and best practices which will help the sincere students to have academic edge over the insincere students and the students' marks or grades shall be the replica of their intellectual ability. It will enable the deserving students to get their due credits and not bring all at the same level. Current problem of flat evaluation which has become more significant in the current pandemic can be overcome. This is mainly because of online examinations in the home environment. This paper suggests and tests some techniques to remove flatness in evaluation and make it more authentic such as, use of uniqueness and uncertainty in question paper and assessment, conducting multiple activities as part of evaluation, giving weightage to various activities as per the efforts, making assessment a multilevel activity etc. The results show the evaluation curves which were flat when no innovative assessment technique was used for assessment became bell shaped when innovative assessment technique was used. Moreover, it was found to be in alignment with testing based on classroom testing under a proctored environment.


Keywords

Innovation, Evaluation, Assessment, Normal Distribution.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2020/04/29/how-discourage-student-cheating-online-exams-opinion
  • https://www.ucl.ac.uk/teaching-learning/assessmentresources/designing-effective-online-assessment
  • Deepti Chavan, Bhushan Nemade, Bhavika Nemade,” Methodologies for Enhancing the Quality of Exam Question Paper Setting and its Evaluation”, National Conference on Evaluation & Assessment Reforms (NCEAR), pp 53-59,2018.
  • Lochan Jolly, Rutvi Thakkar,” Impact of Evaluation System on Student’s Learning Pattern”, National Conference on Evaluation & Assessment Reforms (NCEAR), pp 18-23,2018.
  • Prachi Janrao, Ruta Pathak,” Evaluation & Assessment Tools in Engineering Education”, National Conference on Evaluation & Assessment Reforms (NCEAR), pp 9-11,2018.
  • Looney, J. W., “Assessment and Innovation in Education”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 24, OECD,2009
  • Matthew Allen,” Authentic Assessment and the Internet: Contributions within Knowledge Networks” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA,Oct 26, 2009 in Vancouver, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-76-1. 8. Brophy, Jere, “Synthesis of Research on Strategies for Motivating Students to Learn” Educational Leadership, v45 n2 p40-48 Oct 1987.
  • B. Arend, “Course assessment practices and student learning strategies in online college courses” The Online Learning Consortium's, Published in 2007.
  • Dawn Birch, Michael Volkov,” Assessment of online reflections: Engaging English second language (ESL) students” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 23, Number 3, Jan 01, 2007 ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education.
  • Christine Greenhow, Beth Robelia,” Informal Learning and Identity Formation in Online Social Networks”. Learning, Media and Technology Volume 34, Number 2, June 2009 ISSN 1743- 9884.
  • Lilia Juele, Rockland Community College (SUNY), United States,” Authentic Assessments: A Critical thinking and Engagement Tool for Online Courses” Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC, Jun 25, 2018.
  • Ence Surahman, Agus Wedi, Sulthoni, Yerry Soepriyanto, Punaji Setyosari, ”Design of Peer Collaborative Authentic Assessment Model Based on Group Project Based Learning to Train Higher Order Thinking Skills of Students”. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 285. International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET 2018).
  • Dr. Wendy Barber, Sherry King and Sylvia Buchanan,” Problem Based Learning and Authentic Assessment in Digital Pedagogy: Embracing the Role of Collaborative Communities” The Electronic Journal of e-Learning Volume 13 Issue- 2, 2015.
  • Richard Osborne, Elisabeth Dunne and Paul Farrand,” Integrating technologies into ‘‘authentic’’ assessment design: an affordances approach”. Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 21, 2013, Coaction Publishing.
  • Todd J. B. Blayone, Roland vanOostveen, Wendy Barber, Maurice DiGiuseppe and Elizabeth Childs,” Democratizing digital learning: theorizing the fully online learning community model”. Blayone et al. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (2017) 14:13. DOI 10.1186/s41239-017-0051-4.
  • Mischelle Taylor Stone, Suzanne PerumeanChaney,” The Benefits of Online Teaching for Traditional Classroom Pedagogy: A Case Study for Improving Face-to-Face Instruction”. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2011.
  • Miller, Sandra L.,” Teaching an Online Pedagogy MOOC”. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching . Mar2015, Vol. 11 Issue 1, p87-102. 16p.
  • Olfos, R., & Zulantay, H. (2007),”Reliability and Validity of Authentic Assessment in a Web Based Course”. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 156-173.
  • Maria Hanifah, Alfred Irambona,” Authentic assessment: Evaluation and its application in science learning”. August 2019. Psychology Evaluation.

Abstract Views: 333

PDF Views: 156




  • Innovation in Online Evaluation for Authentic Assessment

Abstract Views: 333  |  PDF Views: 156

Authors

Lochan Jolly
Dean SSW & Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, India
Arpit Vyas
Assistant Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, India
Swapnil Raut
Assistant Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, India
B. K. Mishra
Principal & Professor, Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali, Mumbai, India

Abstract


In the present pandemic condition, challenge as a teacher, is not only to learn new tools for online teaching but also conducting online assessment and to assure that the assessment curves are not flat but shall be a natural response which has bell shaped distribution. We all know the impact of flat evaluation is that the industry will lose trust on the quality of graduate and their knowledge based on marks/grades. This will put the quality of technical education under doubt when high scorers perform poorly in the recruitment process (including job interviews) where students are not even able to pass the basic aptitude clearance test.

Online education may not lack the quality and integrity of face- to-face instruction, but it is easy to cheat in online assessment. So, there is a need to develop some innovative and best practices which will help the sincere students to have academic edge over the insincere students and the students' marks or grades shall be the replica of their intellectual ability. It will enable the deserving students to get their due credits and not bring all at the same level. Current problem of flat evaluation which has become more significant in the current pandemic can be overcome. This is mainly because of online examinations in the home environment. This paper suggests and tests some techniques to remove flatness in evaluation and make it more authentic such as, use of uniqueness and uncertainty in question paper and assessment, conducting multiple activities as part of evaluation, giving weightage to various activities as per the efforts, making assessment a multilevel activity etc. The results show the evaluation curves which were flat when no innovative assessment technique was used for assessment became bell shaped when innovative assessment technique was used. Moreover, it was found to be in alignment with testing based on classroom testing under a proctored environment.


Keywords


Innovation, Evaluation, Assessment, Normal Distribution.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2021%2Fv35i0%2F167018