Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Teaching Learning Process in Higher Education with the Impact of ICT: An Analytical Review


Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, ASTRA, Hyderabad, India
2 2Assistant Professor,, Janata College, Chandrapur, India
3 Asst Professor, Vardhaman College of Engineering, India
 

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


“As models of the teaching–learning process are addressed or when learning difficulties arise, the relationship between teaching, training, and children's learning comes up. Despite extensive study, we still have little understanding of how variations in learning activities affect students' learning. The importance of teachers and teaching as key study subjects has resulted in a restricted understanding of what happens in schools and classrooms. Few studies of teachers and teaching have looked at the degree to which disparities in teacher effectiveness are linked to differences in subject matter expertise, and there is still a tendency to talk about teaching and learning in broad terms without considering the material that has been learned. The author of this article argues that studies of teaching and learning must be linked to studies of the topic in order to create a dialogue between didactics and classroom studies. It is necessary to create an analytical design and structure capable of bridging the teaching– learning gap. Emerging developments in video/audio recording provide one line of inquiry into how various thematic trends are related to instructional activities and classroom interaction formats.

Keywords

Teaching Learning Process, Mentor, Role of Teacher, Higher Education.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2007). Integrating technology for meaningful learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Ghavifekr, S., Afshari, M., & Amla Salleh. (2012). Management strategies for E-Learning system as the core component of systemic change: A qualitative analysis. Life Science Journal, 9(3), 2190-2196.

  • Jamieson-Proctor, R., Albion, P., Finger, G., Cavanagh, R., Fitzgerald, R., Bond, T., & Grimbeek, P. (2013). Development of the TTF TPACK Survey Instrument. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3),26-35.

  • Türel, Y. K., & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' Belief and Use of Interactive Whiteboards for Teaching and Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381–394.

  • Yang, K. T., & Wang, T. H. (2012). Interactive White Board: Effective Interactive Teaching Strategy Designs for Biology Teaching. Tech, E-Learning-Engineering, On-Job Training and Interactive Teaching, 139-154.

  • Conan McKay, Tanya McGinnis ,Lynn Fowler, Graciela Sae-Kleriga, Arthur Guaracha, LaTonya Parker, Karen Chow, Teresa AL dredge. Effective Practices for Online Tutoring, 2019.

  • Chitiyo, M. and Wheeler, J.J., 2009. Analyzing the treatment efficacy of a technical assistance model for providing behavioral consultation to schools. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53(2), pp.85-88.

  • Kumar, R., 2008. Convergence of ICT and Education. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 40(2008), pp.556-559.

  • Kashalkar-Karve, S., 2013. Comparitive study of ancient gurukul system and the new trends of Guru-Shishya Parampara. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 2(1), pp.81-84.

  • Chand, D., 2015. Education system in pre-independence India. International Journal of Applied Research, 1(2), pp.110-113.

  • Massoni, E., 2011. Positive effects of extra curricular activities on students. Essai, 9(1), p.27.

  • Gupta, D. and Gupta, N., 2012. Higher education in India: structure, statistics and challenges. Journal of education and Practice, 3(2).

  • Attwell, G., 2006. Evaluating E-learning: A Guide to the Evaluation of E-learning. Evaluate Europe Handbook Series, 2, pp.1610-0875.

  • De Lusignan, S., Wells, S.E., Hague, N.J. and Thiru, K., 2003. Managers see the problems associated with coding clinical data as a technical issue whilst clinicians also see cultural barriers. Methods of information in medicine, 42(4), pp.416-422.

  • Ruben, B.D., 2007. Excellence in Higher Education Guide: An Integrated Approach to Assessment, Planning, and Improvement in Colleges and Universities. National Association of College and University Business Officers. 1110 Vermont Avenue NW Suite 800, Washington, DC 20005.

  • Price, L., Richardson, J.T. and Jelfs, A., 2007. Face‐to‐face versus online tutoring support in distance education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), pp.1-20.

  • Harsasi, M. and Sutawijaya, A., 2018. Determinants of student satisfaction in online tutorial: a study of a distance education institution. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), pp.89-99.

  • Magennis, S. and Farrell, A., 2005. Teaching and learning activities: Expanding the repertoire to support student learning. Emerging issues in the practice of university learning and teaching, 1.

  • Shafer, E., 1995. A review of interventions to teach a mand repertoire. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 12(1), pp.53-66.

  • Sivaraman, S.I. and Krishna, D., 2015. Blooms Taxonomy–application in exam papers assessment. Chemical Engineering (VITU), 12(12), p.32.

  • Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R. and Pickard, P., 2003. Using blended learning to improve student

  • success rates in learning to program. Journal of educational Media, 28(2-3), pp.165-178.

  • Jordan, M.I. and Rumelhart, D.E., 1992. Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive science, 16(3), pp.307-354.

  • Slavin, R.E., 2010. Co-operative learning: what makes group-work work. The nature of learning: Using research to inspire practice, pp.161-178.

  • Webb, N.M., 2009. The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), pp.1-28.

  • Le Cornu, R. and Peters, J., 2005. Reculturing primary classrooms: renegotiating the four R's (rules, roles, responsibilities and relationships). Change (Sydney, NSW), 8(2), pp.16-30.

  • Farrington, C., Levenstein, R. and Nagaoka, J., 2013. " Becoming Effective Learners" Survey Development Project. Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness.

  • Madden-Hallett, H., Hall, J. and Binney, W., 2006. The creation of effective learners using an autarchic study method. International Journal of Learning, 12, pp.1-8.

  • Siegler, R.S. and Crowley, K., 1994. Constraints on learning in nonprivileged domains. Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), pp.194-226.

  • Gordon, J., Hazlett, C., Ten Cate, O., Mann, K., Kilminster, S., Prince, K., O’Driscoll, E., Snell, L. and Newble, D., 2000. Strategic planning in medical education: enhancing the learning environment for students in clinical settings. Medical education, 34(10), pp.841-850.

  • Xu, D., Huang, W.W., Wang, H. and Heales, J., 2014. Enhancing e-learning effectiveness using an intelligent agent-supported personalized virtual learning environment: An empirical investigation. Information & Management, 51(4), pp.430-440.


Abstract Views: 389

PDF Views: 183




  • Teaching Learning Process in Higher Education with the Impact of ICT: An Analytical Review

Abstract Views: 389  |  PDF Views: 183

Authors

Pradosh Chandra Patnaik
Associate Professor, ASTRA, Hyderabad, India
Aslam Y. Suriya
2Assistant Professor,, Janata College, Chandrapur, India
Mudrakola Swapna
Asst Professor, Vardhaman College of Engineering, India

Abstract


“As models of the teaching–learning process are addressed or when learning difficulties arise, the relationship between teaching, training, and children's learning comes up. Despite extensive study, we still have little understanding of how variations in learning activities affect students' learning. The importance of teachers and teaching as key study subjects has resulted in a restricted understanding of what happens in schools and classrooms. Few studies of teachers and teaching have looked at the degree to which disparities in teacher effectiveness are linked to differences in subject matter expertise, and there is still a tendency to talk about teaching and learning in broad terms without considering the material that has been learned. The author of this article argues that studies of teaching and learning must be linked to studies of the topic in order to create a dialogue between didactics and classroom studies. It is necessary to create an analytical design and structure capable of bridging the teaching– learning gap. Emerging developments in video/audio recording provide one line of inquiry into how various thematic trends are related to instructional activities and classroom interaction formats.

Keywords


Teaching Learning Process, Mentor, Role of Teacher, Higher Education.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2021%2Fv35i0%2F167026