Open Access
Subscription Access
Pedagogies for Blended TLP
Subscribe/Renew Journal
The higher education system is experiencing quick changes in the curriculum to be taught in line with industry demands to make the graduates' industry ready. Therefore, changing curriculum demands quick adoption by the faculty and newer pedagogies to improve student learning. Various technologies are developed to support Teaching and Learning. Technology started playing a key role in improvising student learning by helping the students to collaborate, share and stay in connect with the facilitator anytime for many where. This introduced the concept of ubiquitous learning. The Blended Learning approach gained a lot of attention in higher education across the world, optimizing the use of face-to-face and online sessions. In this approach, the student plays an active role in TLP and the teacher has to fulfill the role, of course, session designer, facilitator, panelist, etc. This article will present how blended learning pedagogy can be implemented effectively.
Keywords
Active Learning, Ubiquitous Learning, Online Learning, E-Activities, Higher Education.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Aluvalu, Rajani Kanth, Vivek Kulkarni, and Md Asif. "Handling Classrooms with Students having Heterogeneous Learning Abilities." Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 31.2 (2017): 36-41.
- Clark, and P. James, Blended learning: An approach to delivering science courses on-line. Proceedings of the Blended Learning in Science Teaching and Learning Symposium, 30 September 2005, The University of Sydney: UniServe Science, 19-24.
- Falconer, and A. Littlejohn, Designing for blended learning and reuse, Journal of Further and Higher Education, (2007), 31(1), 41-52.
- Aluvalu, RajaniKanth. "University Bridge Program: Innovation at the Grass Roots of Learning in Higher Education." Journal of Engineering Education Transformations [Online], 0 (2016).
- C. D. Dziuban, J. L. Hartman, and P.D. Moskal, Blended Learning, ECAR Research Bulletin, 7, (2004) Retrieved July 21, 2010 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf.
- C. Garnham and R. Kaleta, Introduction to Hybrid Courses, Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6) , (2002), Retrieved July 22, 2009 from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm.
- J. J. Wong, Traditional versus hybrid courses. International Journal of Learning, (2006), 13 (8), 163-170.
- I. E. Allen, J. Seaman, and R. Garrett, Blending In: The extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan
- Consortium, (2007), Retrieved May 23, 2009, from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf.
- A. G. Picciano, Blended learning: Implications for growth and access, Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, (2006), 10(3), 95-102.
- Prasad, Kantipudi MVV, and RajaniKanth Aluvalu. "Benefits and challenges of Open Book Examination as Assessment Model for Engineering Courses." Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (2017).
- D. R. Garrison and N. Vaughan, Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, (2008).
- D. R. Garrison and H. Kanuka, Blended learning: Uncovering transformative potential in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, (2004), 7, 95-105.
- Kantipudi, MVV Prasad, et al. "Impact of Covid-19 on Indian Higher Education." Library Philosophy and Practice (2021): 1-11.
- K. Carmody and Z. Berge, Elemental analysis of the online learning experience, International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, (2005), 1(3), 108-119.
Abstract Views: 351
PDF Views: 128