Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Assessment and Attainment of Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Outcome Based Education (OBE) is an approach in the field of engineering education, accepted in recent years all over the world. Output in terms of Cumulative Grade Points Average (CGPA), pass percentage, etc. has been the traditional measurement in education whereas outcome focuses on the level of transformation and achievement in the student. Every institution endeavours to fulfil its mission through its programs which constitute courses and learning activities. The program objectives guide to form the program outcomes, which need to align with universally accepted graduate attributes. These are mapped to the course outcomes whose knowledge levels can be guided by Blooms Taxonomy. Achievement of program objectives can be judged only through the attainment of program outcomes which are indicated by the attainment of the outcomes of the courses which constitute the program. Therefore, assessment tools and attainment methods for the course outcomes and program outcomes are required to indicate the level of transformation at each level. This paper presents a methodology to calculate the attainment of course outcomes and program outcomes and provides the recommended threshold values to identify the extent of desired transformation in a student after a teaching learning process. Awareness and implementation of these assessment methods with systematic review of thresholds and consequent course correction measures can have a profound impact on student success and mission accomplishments of institutions.
Keywords
Assessment, Attainment, Course Outcomes, Program Outcomes, Outcome Based Education, Blooms Taxonomy.
Subscription
Login to verify subscription
User
Font Size
Information
- Anderson, Lorin W & Krathwohl, David R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, Allyn and Bacon, ISBN 978-0-8013-1903-7.
- Aoife Ahern, Caroline Dominguez, Ciaran McNally, John J. O'Sullivan & Daniela Pedrosa (2019). A literature review of critical thinking in engineering education, Studies in Higher Education, 44:5, 816-828, DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1586325
- Examination reforms by AICTE-India: https://www.aicte-india.org/sites/default/files/ExaminationReform s.pdf
- Huhta, Ari (2010). Diagnostic and Formative Assessment. In Spolsky, Bernard & Hult, Francis M. The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Oxford, UK, Blackwell. pp. 469–482.
- Jandhyala N Murthy (2012). Assessment Practices in Engineering – A Review, The Journal of Engineering Education, Vol.No.XXV-3, ISSN: 0971-5843.
- Lavanya C, Jandhyala N Murthy, Satyanarayana Kosaraju, Chapter 4 (Feb 2020), Assessment Practices in Outcome-Based Education: Evaluation Drives Education in Methodologies and Outcomes of Engineering and Technological Pedagogy by IGI Global, pp 50-61, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2245-5.ch004.
- Lorna M. Earl (2003). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, California, Corwin Press, Inc.
- Susan M. Brookhart (2013). How To Create And Use Rubrics For Formative Assessment And Grading, ASCD, Alexandria, Va.
- Washington Accord (2012). International Engineering Alliance. International Engineering Alliance. Archived from The Original on 26 January 2012. Retrieved 2 February 2012.
- William G Spady (1994). Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators, Arlington, ISBN 0876521839.
Abstract Views: 252
PDF Views: 1