Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Redesign of Digital Circuits Course for Enhanced Learning


Affiliations
1 School of ECE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, India
2 Department of ENE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The paper presents the restructuring of course design and delivery, to attain the enhanced learning in Digital Circuits course through pedagogic practices and hands on experience in laboratory. The objective of the paper is to enhance the understanding of the course beyond the class room teaching. The traditional approach of course design, course delivery and course assessment provide less scope for better learning of courses. To address the limitations of traditional approaches, an Outcome Based Education (OBE) proposes many pedagogical practices. The paper proposes a framework to restructure the Digital Circuits course w.r.t.. to content delivery in the class, course projects and the reframing the laboratory experiments. The contents delivery is supported by expert lecture through videos, course project is aided by concept/prototype development and the lab is formulated to exercise multiple problems on a single topic. The students' attainment is measured and analyzed through examination results and feedback. The technical and professional outcomes are achieved through the proposed framework.

Keywords

Digital Circuits, Alternate Design, OBE, Course Design, Course Project, Simulation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Roy Jackson, Jessica Karp, Ellen Patrick and Amanda Thrower, “Social Constructivism”, 2006, Vignette.

  • John A. Centra, “Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness”, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993, 244 pp.

  • Sopiah Abdullah and Adilah Shariff, “The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2008, Vol 4, Issue 4, pp.387-398.

  • Alexandros Papadimitriou, “An Innovative Approach in Teaching Digital Electronics at Technical High Schools”, Inernational Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, ISSN 2250-2459, Vol 2, Issue 9, September 2012.

  • Siddamal S.V. et al. (2015) Enhanced Learning Through Self-Study Component in Engineering Education. In: Natarajan R. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education. Springer, New Delhi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1931-6-53.

  • Kahane H, (1989). “The proper subject matter for critical thinking courses. Argumentation, Vol 3, Issue 2, May 1989, pp 141–147.

  • Salomon G, “Technology and education in the information age”, Tel Aviv: Haifa University, Zemora- Bitan Publishers, 2000.

  • Resnick M, “Rethinking learning in the digital age”, InG. Kirkman (Ed.), The global information technology report 2001-2002, Readiness for the networked world, Oxford University Press, pp.32-37, New York.

  • Patil Ujwala, Suneeta V. Budihal, Saroja V. Siddamal, and Uma K. Mudenagudi. "Activity Based Teaching Learning: An Experience." Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (2016).

  • Thomas T, Davis T, and Kazlauskas K, “Embedding critical thinking in an IS curriculum”, Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol 6, 2007, pp. 327-346.

  • Stephen Black,and Ellis R, “Evaluating the level of critical thinking in introductory investments courses”, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 2010, Vol 14, Issue 4, pp.99-106.

  • Forrester J, “Thinking Creatively; Thinking Critically”, Asian Social Science, Vol 4, No.5, May 2008pp.100- 105.

  • Peter A. Facione, Noreen C. Facione, and Carol A. Giancarlo, “The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relation to critical thinking skill”, Informal Logic, Vol 20, No 1, 2000, pp. 61-84.

  • Saroja V. Siddamal, et.al., Reflective teaching for undergraduate courses: an experience, DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2017/v0i0/111749.

  • Andrea A. DiSessa, “Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy”, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2001- Computers - 271 pages.

  • Barak Rosenshine and Carla Meister, “The use of scaffolds for teaching higher level cognitive strategies”, Educational Leadership, 1992, pp.26- 33.

  • L S Vygotsky, “Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes”, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1978.

  • Priya Sharma, and Michael Hannafin, “Scaffolding critical thinking in an online course: An exploratory study”, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol 31, Issue 2, 2004, pp.181-208. M M Lombardi, “Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview”, Series on Authentic Learning, Educauce learning Initiative (ELI), 2007.


Abstract Views: 148

PDF Views: 2




  • Redesign of Digital Circuits Course for Enhanced Learning

Abstract Views: 148  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Suneeta Budihal
School of ECE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, India
Minal Salunke
Department of ENE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, India
Bhagyashree Kinnal
School of ECE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, India
Nalini Iyer
School of ECE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, India

Abstract


The paper presents the restructuring of course design and delivery, to attain the enhanced learning in Digital Circuits course through pedagogic practices and hands on experience in laboratory. The objective of the paper is to enhance the understanding of the course beyond the class room teaching. The traditional approach of course design, course delivery and course assessment provide less scope for better learning of courses. To address the limitations of traditional approaches, an Outcome Based Education (OBE) proposes many pedagogical practices. The paper proposes a framework to restructure the Digital Circuits course w.r.t.. to content delivery in the class, course projects and the reframing the laboratory experiments. The contents delivery is supported by expert lecture through videos, course project is aided by concept/prototype development and the lab is formulated to exercise multiple problems on a single topic. The students' attainment is measured and analyzed through examination results and feedback. The technical and professional outcomes are achieved through the proposed framework.

Keywords


Digital Circuits, Alternate Design, OBE, Course Design, Course Project, Simulation.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2022%2Fv35i4%2F22116