Journal of Engineering Education Transformations

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Taking Design Thinking to Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review Over a Past Decade


Affiliations
1 Department of Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia., Indonesia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Design thinking (DT) is not only well known in the business field as a user-oriented product design approach. Still, it has also penetrated the field of engineering education as an innovative tool to promote various skills. This paper aims to provide a systematic literature review on the implementation of DT in education that outlines trends and comprehensive content analysis to give more study direction for researchers and educators. A total of 23 papers addressing DT in education published between 2010 and 2021 from Springer were analyzed. The researchers reviewed the distribution of publications in DT by year, journals in which DT studies were published, educational areas of selected papers, the typology of chosen articles, the DT mindsets, and content analysis of DT implication to skills development. The results show that DT publications have fluctuated in number in the last decade and peaked in 2020 with 11 articles. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Journal of Formative Design in Learning, and TechTrends are the three journals that publish the most studies on DT in education. Teacher education is where DT is most often implemented among the reviewed papers, and educational experiments are identified as the dominant typology. Nine mindsets serve as the basis for implementing DT in education, with humancenteredness being the primary mindset. DT as innovative learning supported the development of various essential skills such as creativity, collaboration, problem-solving, teacher professional development,self-direction,empathy, communication, decision-making, digital skills, and global and intercultural awareness.

Keywords

Systematic Literature Review; Design Thinking; Education; Research Trends.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Acebo, E., Miguel-Dávila, J. A., & Herrera, L. (2021). Design thinking (DT) in engineering education (EE): A systematic literature review (SLR). In Organizational Engineering in Industry 4.0 (pp. 185–191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67708-4_19

  • Arifin, N. R., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2021). A systematic literature review of design thinking application in STEM integration. Creative Education,12,1558-1571. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2021.127118

  • Arrington, T. L., & Willox, L. (2021). “I need to sit on my hands and put tape on my mouth”: Improving teachers’ design thinking knowledge, skills, and attitudes through professional development. Journal of Formative Design in Learning,5(1),27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-021-00054-w

  • Azukas, M. E., & Gaudelli, W. (2020). Formative design as a framework for implementing teacher professional development on design thinking. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 4(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-020- 00042-6

  • Balakrishnan, B. (2021). Exploring the impact of design thinking tool among design undergraduates: A study on creative skills and motivation to think creatively. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798- 021-09652-y

  • Boakes, N. J. (2020a). Cultivating design thinking of middle school girls through an origami STEAM project. Journal for STEM Education Research,3(2),259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00025-8

  • Boakes, N. J. (2020b). Cultivating Design Thinking of Middle School Girls through an Origami STEAM Project. Journal for STEM Education Research ,3(2),259–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00025-8

  • Bressler, D. M., & Annetta, L. A. (2021). Using game design to increase teachers’ familiarity with design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798- 020-09628-4

  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.

  • Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2011). Change by Design. Journal of Product Innovation Management,28(3),381–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540- 5885.2011.00806.x

  • Carlgren, L. (2013). Design thinking as an enabler of innovation: Exploring the concept and its relation to building innovation capab ilities. Chalmers U nivers ity of Technology.

  • Carlgren, Lisa, Rauth, I., & Elmquist, M. (2016). Framing design thinking: The concept in idea and enactment. Creativity and Innovation Management,25(1),38–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153

  • Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476- 8070.2010.01632.x

  • Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology and Society, 16(2), 31–51.

  • Chorley, A., Azzam, K., & Chan, T. M. (2022). Redesig ning contin uin g professio nal development: Harnessing design thinking to go from needs assessment to mandate. Perspectives on Medi cal Edu cation, 11, 121–1 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020-00604-1

  • Clark, K., & Smith, R. (2010). Unleashing the power of design thinking. In T. Lockwood (Ed.), Design thinking: integrating innovation, customer experience, and brand value (pp. 47–56). Allworth Press.

  • Dewey, J. (1985). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. McMillan.

  • Eftekhari, F. (2019). Design thinking beyond design discipline: The process of knowledge transfer. North Carolina State University.

  • Friesen, S., & Jacobsen, M. (2015). A design based approach to teachers’ professional learning: Through a design-based, iterative learning process, classroom teachers gain practical knowledge of “know-how” and “know-why”. Canadian Education Association. https://www.edcan.ca/articles/a-design-based approach-toteachers-%0Dprofessionallearning/.

  • Gleason, B., & Jaramillo Cherrez, N. (2021). Design thinking approach to global collaboration and empowered learning: Virtual exchange as innovation in a teacher education course. Tech Trends, 65(3 ), 348 –358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00573-6

  • Goldman, S, & Kabayadondo, Z. (2017). Taking design thinking to school: How the technology of design can transform teachers, learners, and classrooms. In Shelley Goldman & Z. Kabayadondo (Eds.), Taking Design Thinking to School.Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781317327585

  • Goldschmidt, G., & Rodgers, P. A. (2013). The design thinking approaches of three different groups of designers based on self-reports. Design Studies,34(4),454–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.004

  • Guanes, G., Wang, L., Delaine, D. A., & Dringenberg, E. (2021). Empathic approaches in engineering capstone design projects: student beliefs and reported behaviour. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.192798 9

  • Henriksen, D., Jordan, M., Foulger, T. S., Zuiker, S., & Mishra, P. (2020). Essential tensions in facilitating design thinking: Collective reflections. Journal of Formative Designin Learning,4(1),5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-020-00045-3

  • Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Educational experiences with generation z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(3), 847–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9

  • Hero, L.-M., & Lindfors, E. (2019). Students’ learning experience in a multidisciplinary innovation project. Education + Training, 61(4), 500–522. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2018- 0138

  • Hokanson, B., & Kenny, R. (2020). Creativity and critique as formative processes in design thinking. Journal of Formative Design in Learning,4(1),2–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-020-00047-1

  • IDEO. (2015). The field guide to human centered design. IDEO.

  • Irwanto, I., Saputro, A. D., Widiyanti, Ramadhan, M. F., & Lukman, I. R. (2022). Research trends in STEM education from 2011 to 2020: A systematic review of publications in selected journals. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(5), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i05.27003

  • Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence: unleashing the creative potential within us all. Crown Publishing Group.

  • Kijima, R., Yang-Yoshihara, M., & Maekawa, M. S. (2021). Using design thinking to cultivate the next generation of female STEAM thinkers. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 14.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00271-6

  • Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., Benjamin, W., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and design thinking: A framework to support ICT lesson design for 21st century learning. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(3), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0237-2

  • Kyza, E. A., & Constantinou, C. P. (2008). A design-based approach to professional development: The need to see teachers as learners to achieve excellence in inquiry-based science education. In J. Zumbach, N. Schwartz, T. Seufert, & L. Kester (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: The legacy of competence. Springer.

  • Ladachart, L., Cholsin, J., Kwanpet, S., Teerapanpong, R., Dessi, A., Phuangsuwan, L., & Phothong, W. (2021). Ninth-grade students’ perceptions on the design-thinking mindset in the context of reverse engineering. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798- 021-09701-6

  • Lake, D., Flannery, K., & Kearns, M. (2021). A cross-disciplines and cross-sector mixedmethods examination of design thinking practices and outcome. Innovative Higher Education,46(3),337–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09539-1

  • Liedtka, J. (2015). Perspective: Linking design thinking with innovation outcomes through cognitive bias reduction. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(6), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12163

  • Lin, M.-F. G., & Eichelberger, A. (2020). Design thinking as a catalyst for change: Faculty reaction to a redesigned meeting. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 4(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-020-00046-2

  • Lin, M. F. G., & Eichelberger, A. (2020). Transforming faculty communication and envisioning the future with design thinking. TechTrends,64(2),238–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00451-w

  • Lin,P.Y.,Hong,H.Y.,&Chai,C.S.(2020). Fostering college students’ design thinking in a knowledgebuilding environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 949– 974.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09712-0

  • Lloyd, P. (2013). Embedded creativity: Teaching design thinking via distance education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education,23(3),749–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9214-8

  • Lor, R. (2017). Design thinking in education: A critical review of literature. International Academic Conference on Social Sciences and Management.

  • Luka, I. (2020). Design thinking in pedagogy. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 5(2), 6374.https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20142.63.74

  • MacKinnon, K. R., Ross, L. E., Rojas Gualdron, D., & Ng, S. L. (2020). Teaching health professionals how to tailor gender-affirming medicine protocols: A design thinking project. Perspectives on Medical Education, 9(5), 324–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-020- 00581-5

  • McDonald, J. K., West, R. E., Rich, P. J., & Pfleger, I. (2019). “It’s so wonderful having different majors working together”: The development of an interdisciplinary design thinking minor. TechTrends, 63(4), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0325-2

  • Naghshbandi, S. (2020). Exploring the impact of experiencing design thinking on teachers’ conceptualizations and practices. TechTrends, 64(6),868–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528- 020-00517-0

  • Noh, S. C., & Karim, A. M. A. (2021). Design thinking mindset to enhance education 4.0 competitiveness in Malaysia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE),10(2),494. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20988

  • P au l a , D ., & Cormican,K.(2016). Understanding design thinking in design studies (2006-2015): A systematic mapping study. Proceedings of In ternational Design Conference, DESIGN, DS 84, 57–66.

  • Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. . (2012). Design thinking research. Springer.

  • Rusmann, A., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2021). When design thinking goes to school: A literature review of design competences for the K-12 level. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09692-4

  • Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1386/dbs.2.1.71_1

  • Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education,4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1

  • Simeon, M. I., Samsudin, M. A., & Yakob, N. (2020). Effect of design thinking approach on students’ achievement in some selected physics concepts in the context of STEM learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020- 09601-1

  • Stefaniak, J. (2019). The utility of design thinking to promote systemic instructional design practices in the workplace. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00453-8

  • Sung, E., & Kelley, T. R. (2019). Identifying design process patterns: A sequential analysis study of design thinking. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(2), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018- 9448-1

  • Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management,14(3),207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

  • Wahono, B., Narulita, E., Chang, C.-Y., Darmawan, E., & Irwanto, I. (2021). The role of students’ worldview on decision-making: An Indonesian case study by a socio-scientific issue-based instruction through integrated STEM education . E urasia J ournal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,17(11),em2027. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11246

  • Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374–385. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214

  • Yang, J.-L., & McKenzie, S. (2018). Using career development learning in science and information technology courses to build 21st century learners. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 66(3), 137–145. https:// doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2018.1525789

  • Zinger, D., Naranjo, A., Amador, I., Gilbertson, N., & Warschauer, M. (2017). A design-based research approach to improving professional development and teacher knowledge: The case of the Smithsonian learning lab. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 388–410.


Abstract Views: 153

PDF Views: 0




  • Taking Design Thinking to Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review Over a Past Decade

Abstract Views: 153  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Alin Mardiah
Department of Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia., Indonesia
Irwanto Irwanto
Department of Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia., Indonesia
Afrizal Afrizal
Department of Chemistry Education, Universitas Negeri Jakarta, Jakarta 13220, Indonesia., Indonesia

Abstract


Design thinking (DT) is not only well known in the business field as a user-oriented product design approach. Still, it has also penetrated the field of engineering education as an innovative tool to promote various skills. This paper aims to provide a systematic literature review on the implementation of DT in education that outlines trends and comprehensive content analysis to give more study direction for researchers and educators. A total of 23 papers addressing DT in education published between 2010 and 2021 from Springer were analyzed. The researchers reviewed the distribution of publications in DT by year, journals in which DT studies were published, educational areas of selected papers, the typology of chosen articles, the DT mindsets, and content analysis of DT implication to skills development. The results show that DT publications have fluctuated in number in the last decade and peaked in 2020 with 11 articles. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Journal of Formative Design in Learning, and TechTrends are the three journals that publish the most studies on DT in education. Teacher education is where DT is most often implemented among the reviewed papers, and educational experiments are identified as the dominant typology. Nine mindsets serve as the basis for implementing DT in education, with humancenteredness being the primary mindset. DT as innovative learning supported the development of various essential skills such as creativity, collaboration, problem-solving, teacher professional development,self-direction,empathy, communication, decision-making, digital skills, and global and intercultural awareness.

Keywords


Systematic Literature Review; Design Thinking; Education; Research Trends.

References